TERNOPIL STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY

June 20, 2024
0
0
Зміст

TERNOPIL STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY

INSTITUTE OF NURSING

INTERNATIONAL NURSING SCHOOL

 

Theories applied to Community Health Nursing.

 

Although there are many nursing theories, frameworks, and models iursing, this chapter addresses only selected ones. The theories discussed have been selected

because they represent the development of nursing’s scientific thought.

Nursing is a profession focused on assisting individuals, families, and communities in attaining, maintaining, and recovering optimal health and functioning. Modern definitions of nursing define it as a science and an art that focuses on promoting quality of life as defined by persons and families, throughout their life experiences from birth to care at the end of life.

Florence Nightingale is often regarded as the founder of moderursing, which flourished in response to the Crimean War. Other important nurses include Agnes Elizabeth Jones and Linda Richards who established quality nursing schools in the USA and Japan.

Florence Nightingale

 

Florence Nightingale, OM, RRC (12 May 1820 – 13 August 1910), who came to be known as The Lady of the Lamp, was a pioneer of modern nursing, a noted statistician and an inspiration to all.

Her parents were William Edward Nightingale (1794–1875) and Frances Fanny Nightingale née Smith (1789–1880). William Nightingale was born William Edward Shore. His mother Mary née Evans was the niece of one Peter Nightingale, under the terms of whose will William Shore not only inherited his estate Lea Hurst in Derbyshire, but also assumed the name and arms of Nightingale. Fanny’s father (Florence‘s maternal grandfather) was the abolitionist Will Smith.

Inspired by what she took as rebellion against the expected role for a Christian divine calling, experienced first in 1837 at Embley Park and later throughout her life, Nightingale committed herself to become a wife and mother. In those days, nursing was a career with a poor reputation, filled mostly by poorer women, “hangers-on” who followed the armies. In fact, nurses were equally likely to function as cooks. Nightingale announced her decision to enter nursing in 1845 evoking intense anger and distress from her family particularly her mother.

 She cared for poor and indigent people. In December 1844, in response to a pauper’s death in a workhouse infirmary in London that became a public scandal, she became the leading advocate for improved medical care in the infirmaries and immediately engaged the support of Charles Villiers, then president of the Poor Law Board. This led to her active role in the reform of the Poor Laws, extending far beyond the provision of medical care. She was later instrumental in mentoring and then sending Agnes Elizabeth Jones and other Nightingale Probationers to Liverpool Workhouse Infirmary.

 In 1846 she visited Kaiserswerth, Germany, and learned more of its pioneering hospital established by Theodor Fliedner and managed by an order of Lutheran deaconesses. She was profoundly impressed by the quality of care and by the commitment and practices of the deaconesses.

 Nightingale was courted by politician and poet Richard Monckton Milnes, 1st Baron Houghton, but she rejected him, convinced that marriage would interfere with her ability to follow her calling to nursing. When in Rome in 1847, recovering from a mental breakdown precipitated by a continuing crisis of her relationship with Milnes, she met Sidney Herbert, a brilliant politician who had been Secretary at War (1845–1846), a position he would hold again during the Crimean War. Herbert was already married, but he and Nightingale were immediately attracted to each other and they became lifelong close friends. Herbert was instrumental in facilitating her pioneering work in Crimea and in the field of nursing, and she became a key advisor to him in his political career. In 1851 she rejected Milnesmarriage proposal against her mother’s wishes.

 Nightingale also had strong and intimate relations with Benjamin Jowett, particularly about the time that she was considering leaving money in her will to establish a Chair in Applied Statistics at the University of Oxford.

 Nightingale’s career in nursing began in 1851, when she received four months training in Germany as a deaconess of Kaiserswerth. She undertook the training over strenuous family objections concerning the risks and social implications of such activity, and the Roman Catholic foundations of the hospital. While at Kaiserswerth she reported having her most important and intense experience of her divine calling.

 On August 22, 1853, Nightingale took a post of superintendent at the Institute for the Care of Sick Gentlewomen in

Upper Harley Street, London

, a position she held until October 1854. Her father had given her an annual income of £500 (roughly US$50,000/£25,000 in present terms), which allowed her to live comfortably and to pursue her career. James Joseph Sylvester was her mentor.

Crimean War

 Florence Nightingale’s most famous contribution came during the Crimean War, which became her central focus when reports began to filter back to Britain about the horrific conditions for the wounded. On October 21, 1854, she and a staff of 38 women volunteer nurses, trained by Nightingale and including her aunt Mai Smith, were sent (under the authorization of Sidney Herbert) to Turkey, some 545 km across the Black Sea from Balaklava in the Crimea, where the main British camp was based.

 Nightingale arrived early in November 1854 at Selimiye Barracks in Scutari (modern-day Üsküdar in Istanbul). She and her nurses found wounded soldiers being badly cared for by overworked medical staff in the face of official indifference. Medicines were in short supply, hygiene was being neglected, and mass infections were common, many of them fatal. There was no equipment to process food for the patients.

 Florence and her compatriots began by thoroughly cleaning the hospital and equipment and reorganizing patient care. However, during her time at Scutari, the death rate did not drop; on the contrary, it began to rise. The death count would be highest of all other hospitals in the region. During her first winter at Scutari, 4077 soldiers died there. Ten times more soldiers died from illnesses such as typhus, typhoid, cholera and dysentery than from battle wounds. Conditions at the temporary barracks hospital were so fatal to the patients because of overcrowding and the hospital’s defective sewers and lack of ventilation. A sanitary commission had to be sent out by the British government to Scutari in March 1855, almost six months after Florence Nightingale had arrived, which flushed out the sewers and improved ventilation. Death rates were sharply reduced.

 Nightingale continued believing the death rates were due to poor nutrition and supplies and overworking of the soldiers. It was not until after she returned to Britain and began collecting evidence before the Royal Commission on the Health of the Army, that she came to believe that most of the soldiers at the hospital were killed by poor living conditions. This experience would influence her later career, when she advocated sanitary living conditions as of great importance. Consequently, she reduced deaths in the Army during peacetime and turned attention to the sanitary design of hospitals.

 

Return home

 Florence Nightingale returned to Britain a heroine on August 7, 1857, and, according to the BBC, was arguably the most famous Victorian after Queen Victoria herself. Nightingale moved from her family home in Middle Claydon, Buckinghamshire, to the Burlington Hotel in Piccadilly. However, she was stricken by a fever, probably due to a chronic form of Brucellosis (“Crimean fever”) that she contracted during the Crimean war, possibly combined with chronic fatigue syndrome. She barred her mother and sister from her room and rarely left it.

 In response to an invitation from Queen Victoria – and despite the limitations of confinement to her room – Nightingale played the central role in the establishment of the Royal Commission on the Health of the Army, of which Sidney Herbert became chairman. As a woman, Nightingale could not be appointed to the Royal Commission, but she wrote the Commission’s 1,000-plus page report that included detailed statistical reports, and she was instrumental in the implementation of its recommendations. The report of the Royal Commission led to a major overhaul of army military care, and to the establishment of an Army Medical School and of a comprehensive system of army medical records.

 

 A young Florence Nightingale sketch

A young Florence Nightingale

  Later career

 While she was still in Turkey, on November 29, 1855, a public meeting to give recognition to Florence Nightingale for her work in the war led to the establishment of the Nightingale Fund for the training of nurses. There was an outpouring of generous donations. Sidney Herbert served as honorary secretary of the fund, and the Duke of Cambridge was chairman. Nightingale was also considered a pioneer in the concept of medical tourism as well based on her letters from 1856 in which she would write to spas in Turkey detailing the health conditions, physical descriptions, dietary information, and other vitally important details of patients whom she directed there (which was significantly less expensive than Switzerland). She was obviously directing patients of meagre means to affordable treatment.

 By 1859 Nightingale had £45,000 at her disposal from the Nightingale Fund to set up the Nightingale Training School at St. Thomas‘ Hospital on July 9, 1860. (It is now called the Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery and is part of King’s College London.) The first trained Nightingale nurses began work on May 16 at the Liverpool Workhouse Infirmary. She also campaigned and raised funds for the Royal Buckinghamshire Hospital in Aylesbury, near her family home.

 Nightingale wrote Notes on Nursing, which was published in 1860, a slim 136 page book that served as the cornerstone of the curriculum at the Nightingale School and other nursing schools established. Notes on Nursing also sold well to the general reading public and is considered a classic introduction to nursing. Nightingale would spend the rest of her life promoting the establishment and development of the nursing profession and organizing it into its modern form.

 Nightingale’s work served as an inspiration for nurses in the American Civil War. The Union government approached her for advice in organizing field medicine. Although her ideas met official resistance, they inspired the volunteer body of United States Sanitary Commission.

 In 1869 Nightingale and Elizabeth Blackwell opened the Women’s Medical College.

 In the 1870s, Nightingale mentored Linda Richards, “America‘s first trained nurse”, and enabled her to return to the USA with adequate training and knowledge to establish quality nursing schools. Linda Richards went on to become a great nursing pioneer in the USA and Japan.

 By 1882 Nightingale nurses had a growing and influential presence in the embryonic nursing profession. Some had become matrons at several leading hospitals, including, in London, St Mary’s Hospital, Westminster Hospital, St Marylebone Workhouse Infirmary and the Hospital for Incurables at Putney; and throughout Britain, e.g. Royal Victoria Hospital, Netley; Edinburgh Royal Infirmary; Cumberland Infirmary; Liverpool Royal Infirmary as well as at Sydney Hospital, in New South Wales, Australia.

 In 1883 Nightingale was awarded the Royal Red Cross by Queen Victoria. In 1907 she became the first woman to be awarded the Order of Merit. In 1908 she was given the Honorary Freedom of the City of London.

Florence Nightingale - Lady of the Lamp

Florence Nightingale – Lady of the Lamp

 By 1896, Florence Nightingale was bedridden. She may have had what is now known as chronic fatigue syndrome and her birthday is now celebrated as the International CFS Awareness Day. During her bedridden years, she also made pioneering work in the field of hospital planning, and her work propagated quickly across England and the world.

 She died on August 13, 1910. The offer of burial in Westminster Abbey was declined by her relatives, and she is buried in the graveyard at St. Margaret Church in East Wellow, Hampshire.

 Nightengale was a Christian universalist.

 Contributions to statistics

 Florence Nightingale had exhibited a gift for mathematics from an early age and excelled in the subject under the tutorship of her father. She had a special interest in statistics, a field in which her father, a pioneer in the nascent field of epidemiology, was an expert. She made extensive use of statistical analysis in the compilation, analysis and presentation of statistics on medical care and public health.

 Nightingale was a pioneer in the visual presentation of information. Among other things she used the pie chart, which had first been developed by William Playfair in 1801. After the Crimean War, Nightingale used the polar area chart, equivalent to a modern circular histogram or rose diagram, to illustrate seasonal sources of patient mortality in the military field hospital she managed. Nightingale called a compilation of such diagrams a “coxcomb”, but later that term has frequently been used for the individual diagrams. She made extensive use of coxcombs to present reports on the nature and magnitude of the conditions of medical care in the Crimean War to Members of Parliament and civil servants who would have been unlikely to read or understand traditional statistical reports.

 In her later life Nightingale made a comprehensive statistical study of sanitation in Indian rural life and was the leading figure in the introduction of improved medical care and public health service in India.

 In 1858 Nightingale was elected the first female member of the Royal Statistical Society and she later became an honorary member of the American Statistical Associating.

Nightingale did not develop a theory of nursing as theory is defined today, but rather she provided the nursing profession with the philosophical basis from which other theories have emerged and developed. Nightingale’s ideas about nursing have guided both theoretical thought and actual nursing practice throughout the history of moderursing. Nightingale considered nursing similar to a religious calling to be answered only by women with an all-consuming and passionate response. She considered nursing to be both an art and a science and believed that nurses should be formally educated.

Her writings did not focus on the nature of the person but did stress the importance of caring for the ill person rather than caring for the illness. In Nightingale’s view, the person was a passive recipient of care, and nursing’s primary focus was on the manipulation of the person’s environment to maintain or achieve a state of health. Despite the fact that she did not believe in the germ theory, her experiences in the Crimean War magnified her interest in the principles of sanitation and the relationship between environment and health. A person’s health was the direct result of environmental influences, specifically cleanliness, light, pure air, pure water, and efficient drainage. Through manipulating the environment, nursing “aims to discover the laws of nature that would assist in putting the patient in the best possible condition so that nature can effect a cure” (Nightingale, 1859, p. 6). Nursing’s main focus was health, and health was closely related to nursing. Nursing was concerned with the healthy, as well as the sick (Nightingale, 1859). Nightingale’s principles regarding environmenthealth-nursing were implemented in America at the turn of the 20th century. With the development of hospital-based schools of nursing, Nightingale’s principles of sanitation were used to clean up the rat-infested, dirty hospitals of the day. With the use of Nightingale’s ideas, hospitals became a place for people to recover rather than a place to die. When, for a variety of reasons,   hospitals did not hire their owursing graduates, nurses applied Nightingale’s principles in the community in the development of public health nursing. The Henry Street Settlement founded by Lillian Wald is an excellent example of Nightingale’s theory in practice. Private duty nursing and public health nursing remained the primary focus of nursing practice until World War II. At this time, there was a tremendous increase in scientific knowledge and technology affecting health care. As the practice of medicine became more scientifically based, more clients were cared for in hospital settings. Nursing practice likewise became centered in the hospital rather than the home. With this development, it became clear that nursing did not have an adequate theory base to organize new knowledge and guide nursing practice. Nursing began to further develop its knowledge base by incorporating the principles of Nightingale into moderursing theory.

Early Nursing Theories

By its very nature, the development of nursing’s theoretical base has progressed in a methodical and systematic, albeit slow, fashion. Knowledge development is an

ongoing process that is often influenced by driving forces outside the discipline of nursing. The early nurse theorists were not attempting to address the  etaparadigm

concepts because initial consensus on these had not yet been achieved. Rather, these theories were attempting to answer the question, “What is nursing?”

Hildegard Peplau

 

Hildegard Peplau, a psychiatric nurse, combined her research and experience in the development of a theory of psychodynamic nursing, published in Interpersonal Relations in Nursing (1952).

Hildegard Peplau was born in Reading, Pennsylvania on September 1st, 1909. After graduating from the Pottstown, Pennsylvania Hospital School of Nursing in 1931 she worked as an operating room supervisor at Pottstown Hospital. She later received a B.A. in interpersonal psychology from Bennington College, Vermont, in 1943, an M.A. in psychiatric nursing from Teachers College, Columbia, New York, in 1947, and an Ed.D in curriculum development from Columbia in 1953.
During World War II, Hildegard Peplau was a member of the Army Nurse Corps and worked in a neuropsychiatric hospital in London, England. She also did work at Bellevue and Chestnut Lodge Psychiatric Facilities and was in contact with renowned psychiatrists Freida Fromm-Riechman and Harry Stack Sullivan. Hildegard Peplau holds numorous
awards and positions. She retired in 1974. On March 17th, 1999, Hildegard Peplau died peacefully at her home in Sherman Oaks California after a brief illness. She was 89 years old.

 

Drawing from her own knowledge and that from other disciplines, Peplau defined the concepts and stages involved in the development of the nurse-client relationship. From that relationship, she identified the roles of the nurse as stranger, resource person, teacher, leader, surrogate, and counselor. Peplau developed a middle-range theory with a focus on both nursing and the person and did not incorporate all aspects of the metaparadigm into her theory. Although other theories may view the nurseclient relationship differently, the primacy of this relationship iursing has remained.

 

Virginia Henderson

Virginia Henderson’s definition of nursing, considered to be a classic, first appeared in 1955. The unique function of the nurse is to assist the individual, sick or well, in the performance of those activities contributing to health or its recovery (or to a peaceful death) that he would perform unaided if he has the necessary strength, will, or knowledge. And to do this in such a way as to help him gain independence as rapidly as possible. (Henderson, 1966, p. 15) Together with Bertha Harmer, Henderson attempted to identify those basic humaeeds viewed as the basis of nursing care. These needs include the need to maintain physiologic balance, to adjust to the environment, to communicate and participate in social interaction, and to worship according to one’s faith. Her 14 basic needs were published in the Textbook of the Principles and Practice of Nursing, one of the first nursing textbooks. Henderson viewed the nursing role as helping the client from dependence to independence. As an early nursing theorist, Henderson did not intend to develop a theory of nursing, but rather she attempted to define the unique focus of nursing. Henderson’s emphasis on basic humaeeds as the central focus of nursing practice has led to further theory development regarding the needs of the person and how nursing can assist in meeting those needs.

Faye Abdellah

Faye Abdellah, acknowledging the influence of Henderson, expanded Henderson’s 14 needs into 21 problems that she believed would serve as a knowledge base for nursing. Throughout her career, she strongly supported the idea that nursing research would be the key factor in helping nursing to emerge as a true profession. The

research that was done regarding these commoeeds/problems has served as a foundation for the development of what we now know as nursing diagnoses.

Joyce Travelbee

Joyce Travelbee, an educator and psychiatric nurse, was influenced by the philosophy of existentialism, a movement that is centered on individual existence in an

incomprehensible world and the role that free will plays in it, and searched to find meaning in life’s experiences. She extensively developed the ideas of sympathy,

empathy, and rapport in which the nurse could begin to comprehend and relate to the uniqueness of others. Her work focused on the human-to-human relationship

and on finding meaning in experiences such as pain, illness, and distress. Travelbee based most of her theory on her own experiences and readings and

first published her work in Interpersonal Aspects of Nursing in 1966.

Josephine Paterson and Loretta Zderad

The work of Josephine Paterson and Loretta Zderad was similar to that of Travelbee in that it emphasized the humanistic and existential basis of nursing practice.

According to Paterson and Zderad, theory developed from the practice of nursing. Although the models proposed by Travelbee and Paterson and Zderad had some impact at the time of their initial introduction, they did not gain wide popularity and application in nursing. The work of Travelbee and Paterson and Zderad most appropriately fit the Simultaneity Paradigm. Current theorists—such as Watson, Rogers, Parse, Fitzpatrick, and Newman—who have an existential orientation, are rediscovering the merits of Travelbee and Paterson and Zderad.

 

Contemporary Nursing Theories

Although early nursing theorists attempted to answer the question “What is nursing?,” contemporary theorists addressed the metaparadigm concepts in more depth,

focused more specifically oursing actions, and tried to answer the question “When is nursing needed?” The work of contemporary theorists such as Levine, Orem,

and Roy form the theoretical basis for many interventions in current nursing practice.

Myra Levine

Myra Levine’s Conservation Theory is directly grounded iursing practice. In her attempt to describe, explain, and predict the phenomena of concern to nursing,

Levine published the four conservation principles in 1969 in Introduction to Clinical Nursing. Conservation is derived from the Latin word “to keep together.” Levine believed in the wholeness of the human being and the primary focus of conservation is to maintain that wholeness. Levine viewed nursing as assisting clients with the conservation of their uniqueness by helping clients to adapt appropriately. Conservation principles are universal principles designed to link concepts into a cohesive framework within which nursing practice in different environments can be performed (Levine, 1990). According to Levine, the four principles of conservation are:

1. Conservation of Energy: “The individual requires a balance of energy and a constant renewal of energy to maintain life activities” (Levine, 1990, p. 197).

2. Conservation of Structural Integrity: “Structural integrity is concerned with the processes of healing . . . to restore wholeness and continuity after injury or illness” (Levine, 1989, p. 333).

3. Conservation of Personal Integrity: “Everyone seeks to defend his or her identity as a self, in both that hidden, intensely private person that dwells within and in the public faces assumed as individuals move through their relationships with others” (Levine, 1989, p. 334).

4. Conservation of Social Integrity: “No diagnosis should be made that does not include the other persons whose lives are entwined with that of the individual” (Levine, 1989, p. 336).

Myra Estrine Levine Mandala

Conservation: Symbolized by a light bulb in the center. Light bulbs give light and are productive. Light bulbs also symbolize ideas… theories are ideas.

Historicity: genetics. The hearts show dominant (dark pink) and recessive (light pink) traits.

Specificity: Different pathways are coming from the center of the light bulb representing the multiple stimulus response pathways.

Redundancy: If one pathway can’t get the job done, another pathway will compensate. (ADWSUF04)

 

According to Levine, the person is who the person knows himself or herself to be and the environment is the context in which the person lives his or her life. In Levine’s view, health is socially defined and the goal of nursing is based on the four conservation principles. Levine did not operationally define and relate the metaparadigm concepts in her theory because her original work was initially intended to be a medical-surgical nursing textbook and not a developed nursing theory. In

reevaluating her theory 20 years later, Levine stated that she has “grown in [her] conviction that they [the conservation principles] continue to offer an approach

to nursing that is scientific, research oriented, and above all suitable in daily practice in many environments” (Levine, 1989, p. 331).

A nurse who is involved in acute care situations such as an emergency room or intensive care unit often deals with clients who are exposed to severe threats to physiological integrity. The conservation of structural integrity is often the immediate priority in these acute care situations. For example, when a nurse in an emergency room is dealing with a client who has been in a severe motor vehicle accident, the client’s structural integrity is at risk. When the client’s structural integrity has been damaged, the client must put all available energy into healing the self. The nurse tries to provide care for that client so that energy can be conserved for the processes of healing. In addition to experiencing a threat to structural integrity, this client has other needs as well. The client has social relationships and these relationships are also disrupted by the accident. The nurse is concerned with the client’s spouse and family who are part of the social unit. Even in this time of crisis in the emergency room, the client’s social integrity is of concern. Finally, the nurse is also concerned about the client’s personal integrity because the traumatic experience and necessary treatment can be frightening and dehumanizing. As the nurse strives to maintain the client’s structural, social, and personal integrity, the nurse recognizes that the client is a person who is a unique individual. Levine’s four conservation principles can also be useful in a home setting in which the family rather than a single individual is the client. The nurse recognizes that energy within the family needs to be maintained to keep the family whole. In caring for the family, the nurse needs to maintain the structural, social, and personal integrity of the family and of each individual while dealing with the illness of a specific family member. Consider, for example, the nurse who makes a home health visit to see a child with cystic fibrosis. In this situation, the nurse’s attentioeeds to be directed toward conservation of energy for the child. To help conserve the child’s energy for breathing, exercises must be taught to and done by others. The nurse directs strategies toward conserving the child’s structural integrity while recognizing that the child is a unique individual and is a member of a social group, the family. Conservation of social integrity would be accomplished through maintaining interest in and monitoring the family dynamics.

Levine is pragmatic, and the conservation principles can be applied to most nursing situations. Her theory is appropriate for use in situations in which the nurse has had a long-term relationship with the client, yet is also useful for short-term relationships. Levine’s theory is congruent with the characteristics of the Totality Paradigm.

 

Dorothea Orem

 

In attempting to plan a nursing curriculum for licensed practical nurses, Dorothea Orem was searching for a pragmatic framework to organize nursing knowledge.

She focused on the questions “What is nursing?” and “When do people need nursing care?” and from this she derived that people need nursing when they are unable

to care for themselves. In 1971, she presented the Self- Care Deficit Theory of Nursing (S-CDTN) in the book Nursing Concepts of Practice and has continually revised

and updated her theory. Orem’s theory incorporates the medical model rather than rejects it, centers on the individual, is problem oriented, and is easily adaptable in varied clinical situations. These attributes create its wide appeal for application iursing practice. Meleis (1991, p. 401) stated that it has “the widest circle of all

theories in practice.” As a grand theory, the S-CDTN has three interconnecting theories: Theory of Self- Care, Theory of Self-Care Deficit, and Theory of Nursing Systems. Each one is discussed below.

 

Theory of Self-Care

According to this theory, self-care is a learned behavior and a deliberate action in response to a need. Orem identified three categories of self-care requisites: universal

self-care requisites, developmental self-care requisites, and health-deviation self-care requisites. Universal self-care requisites are common to all human beings and include both physiological and social interactioeeds. Developmental self-care requisites are the needs that arise as the individual grows and develops. Health-deviation self-care requisites result from the needs produced by disease or illness states. Self-care is performed by mature and maturing individuals. When

someone else must perform a self-care need, it is termed dependent care.

Interpretation of Orem’s theory through Mandala art

Self care: The flag design represents independence. People are independent when they do what they can to maintain life, health, and well-being.

Self-care deficit: The handicap symbol, made into a compass, symbolizes dependency of the patient coupled with the guidance, direction, and support of the nurse.

Nursing systems: Represented by the fish and hook because it reminds me of the saying: “Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime.” The nurse compensates for what the patient cannot do for himself while teaching how to care for himself.

Nursing Process: All the symbols are encompassed in a larger symbol- an apothecary symbol. This symbol represents diagnosis and prescription, determining why nursing care is needed.  (ADWSUF04)

 

Theory of Self-Care Deficit

This theory purports that nursing care is needed when people are affected by limitations that do not allow them to meet their self-care needs. The relationship

between the nurse and the client is established when a self-care deficit is present. Self-care deficits, not medical diagnosis, determine the need for nursing care.

According to Orem, the only legitimate need for nursing care is when a self-care deficit exists.

Theory of Nursing Systems

This is the unifying theory that “subsumes the theory of self-care deficit which subsumes the theory of self-care” (Orem, 1991, p. 66). The Theory of Nursing Systems attempts to answer the question “What do nurses do?” This was the original question that prompted the development of Orem’s theory. The nurse determines whether or not there is a legitimate need for nursing care. Is a person able to meet self-care needs? Does a deficit exist? If a deficit exists, then the nurse plans care that identifies what is to be done by whom: the nurse, the client, or other (family or significant other). Collectively, the actions of all these people are called the nursing system. Orem identified three types of nursing systems: wholly compensatory, partly compensatory, and supportive-educative. In the wholly  ompensatory nursing system, the nurse supports and protects the client, compensates for the client’s inability to care for self, and attempts to provide care for the client. The nurse would use the wholly compensatory nursing system when caring for a newborn or with a client in a postanesthesia care unit who is recovering from surgery. Both of these clients are completely unable to provide self-care. In the partly compensatory nursing system, both the nurse and client perform care measures. For example,

the nurse can assist the postoperative client to ambulate. The nurse may bring in a meal tray for the client who is able to feed self. The nurse compensates for what the client cannot do. The client is able to perform selected self-care activities but also accepts care performed by the nurse for needs the client is unable to meet independently. In the supportive-educative nursing system, the nurse’s actions are to help clients develop their own self-care abilities through knowledge, support, and encouragement. Clients must learn and perform their own self-care activities. The supportive-educative nursing system is being used when a nurse guides a new mother to breastfeed her baby.

Types of Nursing Systems

When caring for clients who require the wholly compensatory nursing system, how would you feel about giving complete personal care to a client who has experienced a stroke and is unable to bathe or toilet himself or herself? How would you approach such a situation?

 

Neuman Systems Model

 

 Born 1924 near Lowell, Ohio.
In 1947 she received RN Diploma from Peoples Hospital School of Nursing, Akron, Ohio. She then moved to California and gained experience as a hospital, staff, and head nurse; school nurse and industrial nurse; and as a clinical instructor in medical-surgical, critical care and communicable disease nursing. In 1957 Dr. Neuman attended the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) with double major in psychology and public health. She received BS iursing from UCLA. In 1966 she received Masters degree in Mental Health, Public Health Consultation fom UCLA.
Dr. Neuman is recognized as pioneer in the field of nursing involvement in community mental health. She began developing her model while lecturing in community mental health at UCLA. In 1972 her model was first published as a ‘Model for teaching total person approach to patient problems’ in Nursing Research. In 1985 she received her doctorate in Clinical Psychology from Pacific Western University. In 1998 she received a second honorary doctorate, this one from Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan.

The Neuman Systems Model was originally developed in 1970 at the University of California, Los Angeles, by Betty Neuman, Ph.D., RN. The model was developed by Dr. Neuman as a way to teach an introductory nursing course to nursing students. The goal of the model was to provide a wholistic overview of the physiological, psychological, sociocultural, and developmental aspects of human beings. After a two-year evaluation of the model, it was published in Nursing Research (Neuman & Young, 1972).

The Neuman Systems Model is a unique, systems-based perspective that provides a unifying focus for approaching a wide range of nursing concerns. The Neuman Systems Model is a comprehensive guide for nursing practice, research, education, and administration that is open to creative implementation…(and) has the potential for unifying various health-related theories, clarifying the relationships of variables iursing care and role definitions at various levels of nursing practice. The multidimensionality and wholistic systemic perspective of the Neuman Systems Model is increasingly demonstrating its relevance and reliability in a wide variety of clinical and educational settings throughout the world. (Betty Neuman, 2002)

 

Omaha System

 

The Omaha System is a comprehensive, research-based classification system designed for use in diverse community, case management, long-term care, and educational settings to enhance health care practice, documentation, and information management. Consisting of three interrelated components –

·        the Problem Classification Scheme,

·        the Intervention Scheme, and the Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes – it provides a structure to document client needs and strengths, describe practitioner interventions, and measure client outcomes.

Work on the Omaha System began in the 1970s when Visiting Nurse Association (VNA) of Omaha (Nebraska) staff began revising their home health and public health client records and adopting a problem-oriented approach. The goal was to provide a useful guide for practice, a method for documentation, and a framework for information management. From the beginning, DeLanne Simmons, VNA of Omaha Chief Executive Officer, envisioned a computerized management information system that incorporated an integrated, valid and reliable clinical information system organized around clients who received services, not the multidisciplinary practitioners who provided services.

Between 1975 and 1986, three research projects were funded by the Division of Nursing, US DHHS to develop and refine the Omaha System. Further research designed to establish reliability, validity, and usability was conducted between 1989 and 1993, and funded by a National Institute of Nursing Research, NIH RO-1 grant. Practitioners employed at the VNA of Omaha and 7 diverse test sites located throughout the USA participated in the four empirical, inductive studies. Practitioners submitted data based on actual client services they were providing, not on retrospective record review. In addition to the rigorous developmental research, more than 50 unique and diverse additional studies have been conducted to generate findings of practical, economic, scholarly, and professional value.

During the early years, information was disseminated through workshops and speeches. The first Omaha System article was published in 1981, the first books in 1992, and the current book in 2005.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Приєднуйся до нас!
Підписатись на новини:
Наші соц мережі