ANTIANGINAL AGENTS (Nitroglicerinum, Sustac, Isosorbidi dinitras, Isosorbidi mononitras, Verapamilum, Amlodipinum, Anaprilinum, Atenololum, Metoprololum, Dipiridamolum, Drotaverinum (No-spanum), Validolum, Trimetasidinum, ADP-long)
ANTIARRHYTHMIC AGENTS (Chinidini sulfas, Novocainamidum, Ethmosinum, Ajmalinum, Lidocainum, Trimecainum, Dypheninum, Aethacizinum, Propaphenolum (Rythmilen), Anaprilinum (Propranololum), Atenololum, Talinololum, Metoprololum, Amiodaronum, Verapamilum)
ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS (Anaprilinum (Propranololum), Atenololum, Talinololum, Metoprololum, Carvediolum, Prasosinum, Doxasosinum, Labetololum, Captoprilum (Capotenum), Enalaprilum, Lisinoprilum, Losartanum, Clopamidum,Fenigidinum, Amlodipinum, Furosemidum, Dichlothiazidum, Spironolactonum, Clophelinum, Reserpinum, Octadinum, Methyldopha, Pentoxiphyllinum Agapurinum), Diazoxidum, Natrii nitroprussidum, Drotaverinum, (No–spa), Magnesii sulfas, Dibasolum, Papaverini hydrohloridum)
Antianginal agents
Angina pectoris is chest pain due to ischemia (a lack of blood and hence oxygen supply) of the heart muscle, generally due to obstruction or spasm of the coronary arteries (the heart’s blood vessels). Coronary artery disease, the main cause of angina, is due to atherosclerosis of the cardiac arteries. The term derives from the Greek ankhon (“strangling”) and the Latin pectus (“chest”), and can therefore be translated as “a strangling feeling in the chest”.
http://www.musc.edu/bmt737/spring2001/Kate/angina2.html
An anginal pain attack signals a transient hypoxia of the myocardium. As a rule, the oxygen deficit results from inadequate myocardial blood flow due to narrowing of larger coronary arteries. The underlying causes are: most commonly, an atherosclerotic change of the vascular wall (coronary sclerosis with exertional angina); very infrequently, a spasmodic constriction of a morphologically healthy coronary artery (coronary spasm with angina at rest; variant angina); or more often, a coronary spasm occurring in an atherosclerotic vascular segment. The goal of treatment is to prevent myocardial hypoxia either by raising blood flow (oxygen supply) or by lowering myocardial blood demand (oxygen demand) (A).
Factors determining oxygen supply. The force driving myocardial blood flow is the pressure difference between the coronary ostia (aortic pressure) and the opening of the coronary sinus (right atrial pressure). Blood flow is opposed by coronary flow resistance, which includes three components. (1) Due to their large caliber, the proximal coronary segments do not normally contribute significantly to flow resistance. However, in coronary sclerosis or spasm, pathological obstruction of flow occurs here. Whereas the more common coronary sclerosis cannot be overcome pharmacologically, the less common coronary spasm can be relieved byappropriate vasodilators (nitrates, nifedipine). (2)
The caliber of arteriolar resistancevessels controls blood flow through the coronary bed. Arteriolar caliber is determined by myocardial O2 tension and local concentrations of metabolic products, and is “automatically” adjusted to the required blood flow (B, healthy subject). This metabolic autoregulation explains why anginal attacks in coronary sclerosis occur only during exercise (B, patient). At rest, the pathologically elevated flow resistance is compensated by a corresponding decrease in arteriolar resistance, ensuring adequate myocardial perfusion. During exercise, further dilation of arterioles is impossible. As a result, there is ischemia associated with pain. Pharmacological agents that act to dilate arterioles would thus be inappropriate because at rest they may divert blood from underperfused into healthy vascular regions on account of redundant arteriolar dilation. The resulting “steal effect” could provoke an anginal attack. (3) The intramyocardial pressure, i.e., systolic squeeze, compresses the capillary bed. Myocardial blood flow is halted during systole and occurs almost entirely during diastole. Diastolic wall tension (“preload”) depends on ventricular volume and filling pressure. The organic nitrates reduce preload by decreasing venous return to the heart. Factors determining oxygen demand. The heart muscle cell consumes the most energy to generate contractile force. O2 demand rises with an increase in (1) heart rate, (2) contraction velocity, (3) systolic wall tension (“afterload”). The latter depends on ventricular volume and the systolic pressure needed to empty the ventricle. As peripheral resistance increases, aortic pressure rises, hence the resistance against which ventricular blood is ejected. O2 demand is lowered by в-blockers and Ca-antagonists, as well as by nitrates It is common to equate severity of angina with risk of fatal cardiac events. There is a weak relationship between severity of pain and degree of oxygen deprivation in the heart muscle (i.e. there can be severe pain with little or no risk of a heart attack, and a heart attack can occur without pain). Worsening (“crescendo”) angina attacks, sudden-onset angina at rest, and angina lasting more than 15 minutes are symptoms of unstable angina (usually grouped with similar conditions as the acute coronary syndrome). As these may herald myocardial infarction (a heart attack), they require urgent medical attention and are generally treated as a presumed heart attack.
Most patients with angina complain of chest discomfort rather than actual pain: the discomfort is usually described as a pressure, heaviness, tightness, squeezing, burning, or choking sensation. Apart from chest discomfort, anginal pains may also be experienced in the epigastrium (upper central abdomen), back, neck, jaw, or shoulders. Typical locations for radiation of pain are arms (often inner left arm), shoulders, and neck into the jaw. Angina is typically precipitated by exertion or emotional stress. It is exacerbated by having a full stomach and by cold temperatures. Pain may be accompanied by breathlessness, sweating and nausea in some cases. It usually lasts for about 1 to 5 minutes, and is relieved by rest or specific anti-angina medication. Chest pain lasting only a few seconds is normally not angina.
Myocardial ischemia comes about when the myocardia (the heart muscles) fail to take in sufficient blood and oxygen to function correctly. This inadequate perfusion of blood and the resulting reduced delivery of oxygen and nutrients, is directly correlated to blocked or narrowed blood vessels.
Some experience “autonomic symptoms” (related to increased activity of the autonomic nervous system) such as nausea, vomiting and pallor. Major risk factors for angina include cigarette smoking, diabetes, high cholesterol, high blood pressure and family history of premature heart disease. A variant form of angina (Prinzmetal’s angina ) occurs in patients with normal coronary arteries or insignificant atherosclerosis. It is thought to be caused by spasms of the artery. It occurs more in younger women. Increase in heart rate results in increased oxygen demand by the heart. The heart has a limited ability to increase its oxygen intake during episodes of increased demand. Therefore, an increase in oxygen demand by the heart (eg, during exercise) has to be met by a proportional increase in blood flow to the heart.
Myocardial ischemia can result from:
1. a reduction of blood flow to the heart caused by the stenosis or spasm of the heart’s arteries
2. resistance of the blood vessels
3. reduced oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood.
Angina pectoris—it is a common disease (ischaemic heart disease) affecting the middle aged persons, usually males.
Angina→ pain, Pectoris→ chest.
Definition—it is a clinical condition where there is chest pain due to transient ischaemia resulting due to imbalance in O2 supply and O2 demand.
Causes of pain—
1. Atherosclerotic narrowing of the epicardial arteries (fat deposition in the sub-endothelial region/tunica intima)
2. Prinz metal angina / variant angina—due to spasm of the epicardial arteries.
3. Severe left ventricular hypertrophy where demand of the hypertrophied myocardium is so great that coronary blood supply fails to meet the demand.
4. Thrombosis.
5. Other less important causes are—
a. Narrowing of the coronary ostea.
b. Congenital anomaly and so forth.
*** A transient ischaemia is produced due to underlying disease, as a result myocardial cells suffer from ischaemia and ischaemic pain is felt.
Precipitating factors—
1. Heavy meal
2. Intense physical exercise
3. Intense emotion
4. Cold exertion
Risk factors—smoking, HTN, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia
Basically there are two things to be considered—
1. The requirement that is the O2 demand of the heart.
2. The O2 supply via the coronary blood flow.
Obviously fall of O2 supply or rise of O2 demand or combination of both can precipitate an anginal attack.
Preload—venous return to the heart.
Afterload—arterial side of the heart (the aorta and the branches, blood pumped out)
*** the TPR determines the afterload
Factors determining cardiac output—
1. HR
2. Force of contraction
3. Preload (increases in fluid overload)
4. Afterload (increases in valvular disease and increased PR)
*** if the angina persists for more than 30 min with other sign symptoms such as sweating, palpitation, then it is MI.
*** diabetic patients are sometimes not aware of cardiac pain
Unstable angina—when anginal pain is felt even at rest without any provocation then it is called unstable angina.
Basic steps of treatment—
1. To give symptomatic treatment
2. To cure the underlying cause
3. Remove the risk factors
Pharmacotherapy of atherosclerotic angina / anti-anginal drugs—
These are divided into 3 groups (all drugs basically reduces the O2 demand of the heart)—
a. Nitrates
b. Calcium channel blockers
c. β-blockers
Nitrates—reduce the O2 demand by venodilatation, thus reducing the preload of the heart. They also dilate epicardial arteries and to some extent reduce the after load.
Calcium channel blockers—cause systemic arteriolar dilatation resulting in ↓ PR. So there is fall of BP and after load decreases. They also dilate the epicardial arteries.
β-blockers—works by reducing the tachycardia and/or contractility—thus work done by the heart is reduced.
*** epicardial arterial dilatation is well marked with calcium channel blockers, so they are popularly used in prinz metals angina where there is spasm of the epicardial arteries.
NITRATES (Nitro-vasodilators)—
Theses are simple nitrous or nitric acid esters of poly alcohol. The prototype is nitroglycerine/GTN
Nitro-vasodilators can be,
1. Nitrites— |
Amyl nitrites (almost obsolete) |
2. Nitrates— |
Glycerin tri-nitrate (GTN) Iso-sorbide di-nitrate Iso-sorbide mono nitrate Erithrityl tetra-nitrate |
Nitrates and nitrites with their route of administration—
Amyl nitrate— |
Inhalation |
|
Glycerin tri-nitrate— |
Sublingual (Angist tab) Trans-dermal patches |
Per cutaneous IV |
Iso-sorbide di-nitrate— |
Sublingual Oral |
Ointment IV |
Iso-sorbide mono-nitrate— |
Oral |
|
Erithrityl tetra-nitrate— |
Oral Sublingual |
|
*** in emergency nitrate spray can be given.
*** we usually do not give nitrate orally as there is extensive first pass metabolism→ ↓ bioavailability→↓ efficacy.
Nitrates can be used as anti-anginal drug for the following purpose—
1. To abort an attack (when pain already started), for this purpose short acting nitrate given sublingually is very effective.
2. Just before an anticipated but unavoidable stress which is likely to precipitate angina. Ex—physical exertion, heated argument.
3. Long term prophylaxis, drug is routinely given.
Short acting nitrates—
i. GTN
ii. Iso-sorbide di-nitrate when given sublingually
iii. Erithrityl tetra-nitrate when given sublingually
Long acting—
i. Iso-sorbide di-nitrate when given orally
ii. Iso-sorbide mono-nitrate when given orally
iii. Nitroglycerine ointment
Mechanism of Action of nitrates (gross organ level)—
Nitrates cause relaxation of the vascular smooth muscles particularly venodilatation, thus reduces the pre-load (venous return to the heart). So there is reduction in the ventricular cavity diameter and reduction in the ventricular wall stretching. As a result there is fall of O2 demand.
Fall of BP due to arteriolar relaxation caused by small or lower dose of nitrates are compensated via sino-aortic reflex which causes tachycardia and vasospasm, thus correcting the BP.
At higher doses the compensatory mechanism cannot prevent fall of BP. So there is fall of afterload.
Nitrates can also dilate epicardial arteries.
Mechanism of Action of nitrates (at molecular level)—
The di-nitrates taken are converted into mono-nitrates in the body (liver). Mono-nitrates within the vascular wall are converted first into nitrous oxide then into nitric oxide which is a potent vasodilator.
{From the vascular smooth muscle the nitric oxide is released and activates the Guanylil cyclase present in the endothelium. Active G cyclase converts GTP into GMP which is a 2nd messenger. GMP causes dephosphorilation of the myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) which causes vasodilatation}
Conversion of nitrous oxide into nitric oxide requires the presence of sulph-hydril (SH) group of glutathione. So if nitrites are used for prolong period the SH group will be used up. So further conversion of nitrous oxide to nitric oxide will not be possible and tolerance will develop.
Because of vasodilatation some adverse effects can be seen—
1. Headache (due to meningeal vasodilatation)
2. Throbbing sensation within the head (intracranial vasodilatation)
3. Flushing of the face
4. Palpitation (due to reflex tachycardia)
5. Orthostatic hypotension (due to peripheral pulling of blood)
Clinical uses of nitrates—
1. angina pectoris
2. heart failure
3. acute hypertension (IV nitroglycerin)
4. acute myocardial infarction (in this case the drug is used cautiously and by specialist)
5. cardiac arrhythmia
6. migraine
7. hyperthyroidism (T3 and T4 increases the number of β1 receptors in the heart)
Nitrate tolerance—it is a condition associated with the use of long acting nitrates (mono and di) in which there may be sustained elevation in the blood concentration of the nitrates. If we give drugs at 6-8 hours interval (drug free period) then we can avoid this phenomena. It is mainly associated with the reduction of vascular smooth muscle SH (sulph-hydril) group.
Individual drugs—
GTN—
1. Available as tablets (sublingual) 300-600μgm and used as the drug of choice in angina pectoris.
2. Oral (buccal/swallow) formulation of 1-5mg. these are sustained release preparations.
3. Metered oral spray in acute condition (given under the tongue and then mouth is closed).
4. Formulation applied via skin available in patches or ointment, used for prophylaxis.
Iso-sorbide di-nitrate—
1. Oral formulation (½ life is 20min).
2. Used as prophylaxis for angina.
3. Have extreme first pass metabolism and less systemic availability than mono-nitrates.
(Breaks down into mono-nitrates in the body).
Iso-sorbide mono-nitrate—
1. Oral formulation (½ life is 4hrs).
2. Has less extensive first pass metabolism but more systemic availability.
3. Used in prophylaxis of angina.
note:-
Afterload reducers—relaxation of the arterial vascular smooth muscle.
Ex—Hydralazine, Diazoxide, Minoxidin, Ca++ channel blockers.
Preload and afterload reducers—relaxes the vascular smooth muscle of both arteries and veins.
Ex—ACE inhibitors, Nitroprusside, Nitrates (mainly relaxation of the veins)
Ca++-channel blocker—
They are used in—angina, hypertension, supra-ventricular tachycardia.
Classification—
According to the chemical structure—
1. Phenyl alk-amines—Verapamil.
2. Di-hydro pyridines—Nifedipine, Amlodipine, Nicardipine, Felodipine, Nimodipine.
3. Benzodiazepine—Diltiazem.
According to the generation—
1. First generation (older)—Verapamil, Nifedipine, Diltiazem.
2. Second generation (newer)—
Amlodipine (ultra long acting, half life is 36 hrs)
Felodipine and Isradipine (intermediate acting, half life is 8 hrs)
Nicardipine (short acting, half life is 4 hrs)
*** they differ in pharmacokinetics—they are absorbed well but suffers hepatic first pass metabolism, thus bioavailability is not good. Bioavailability can increase in two conditions—
i. hepatic damage
ii. when used in high doses because degrading enzymes are saturated
usually 2nd generation drugs have longer plasma half life.
Pharmacodynamics—
Mechanism of Action—
1. At gross level calcium channel blockers cause relaxation of the vascular smooth muscle. It may decrease the myocardial contractility. Influences the development of pace making by SA node and AV node.
2. At molecular level they act on tissue where the development of action potential is largely dependent on entry of calcium from ECF to ICF.
There are 2 such tissues—vascular smooth muscle and myocardial cells. (in skeletal muscle Na+ causes contraction)
Hence calcium channel blockers will act on the vascular smooth muscles as well as myocardial cells but have no effect on skeletal muscle.
In the vascular smooth muscle, the calcium ion enters from the ECF via the calcium channel and forms a complex with a protein called calmodulin within the cytosol. This calmodulin-calcium complex now stimulates the enzyme called myosin light chain kinase (MLKC). MLKC causes phosphorylation of myosin light chain. So that myosin-ATP complex is formed, resulting in contraction of the muscle.
Ca++ channel blockers primarily cause dilatation of the arterioles but not the veins, so they are afterload reducers. Because arterioles dilate, there is ↓ in the PR and ↓ in BP. So heart will act against less resistance, workload of the heart will be reduced and O2 demand will also be reduced. This less O2 demand will thus relief the ischaemia and angina.
Ca++ channel blockers also relaxation of the epicardial arteries. So they are very effective in vaso-spastic or prinz metal angina. In myocardial cells the events are as follows—calcium enters the myocardial cells through the channels and activates the sarcoplasmic reticulum, causing release of Ca++ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum then calcium ion concentration in the cytosol rises causing contraction of the myocardial cells.
Ca++ channel blockers can also cause GIT relaxation producing constipation side effects. Relaxation of the bronchus and the uterus can occur to some extent.
In low therapeutic doses Ca++ channel blockers can affect the vascular smooth muscle only, but not the myocardial cells. Therefore at low doses Ca++ channel blockers can cause vasodilatation but little or no effect on the heart.
Note:-Verapamil and diltiazem can reduce myocardial contractility and HR whereas nifedipine produces tachycardia.
Individual drugs—
Verapamil—it has effects on heart and arterial tree.
On heart—
a. Myocardial contractility
b. Produces bradycardia by acting on the SA node and AV node. So verapamine is also used in supra-ventricular tachycardia.
*** it cause constipation and ankle oedema.
It is contra-indicated in—
a. Sick-sinus syndrome
b. Conduction defect of AV node (heart block)
c. Myocardial failure
d. Cannot be used with β-blockers
Nifedipine—more powerful arteriolar dilator than Verapamil, it also dilates the coronary epicardial arterioles better. It has very little negative ionotropic effect on the heart. It can produce reflex tachycardia due to ↓ BP.
It is very popular in prinz-metal angina, it can be used along with β-blockers (nifedipine ↑ HR and β-blockers ↓ HR)
Mechanism of reflex tachycardia—
Nifedipine→ arteriolar dilatation→ ↓ PR→ ↓ BP→ sensed by the sino-aortic receptor (baroreceptor) in the arch of the aorta→ send signal to the vasomotor center (VMS) in the medulla→ VMC increases sympathetic outflow→ secretion of adrenalin and nor-adrenalin→ act on the β1 receptor of the heart→ ↑ HR.
Therapeutic use of Ca++ channel blockers—
1. Hypertension
2. Angina
3. Some of them are used in supra-ventricular tachycardia.
4. They may be used in Raynaud’s phenomenon
5. Cardiac myopathy
6. Prevention of the pre-term labour
As anti-anginal agent they have several advantages—
1. They are largely a safe drug
2. Drug of choice in prinz metal angina
3. Nifedipine can be used along with β-blockers but Verapamil and Diltiazem cannot be used.
4. They can be used in diabetes whereas β-blockers are not used.
5. They have no bad effects on lipid profile but β-blockers have.
6. They do not develop tolerance but nitrates do.
Side effects—
a. Excessive vasodilatation (nifedipine) can lead to headache, dizziness, flushing of the face, syncopal attack.
b. In some persons anginal attack can be aggravated due to reflex tachycardia (nifedipine) and coronary steal.
β-blockers—
The objective to use β blockers in angina is to reduce the myocardial O2 demand by reducing the heart rate, blood pressure and myocardial contractility.
The different β blockers differ in their pharmacokinetic properties. Propranolol (lipid soluble) is the prototype.
2nd generation drug is Metoprolol.
Very short acting drug is Esmolol and very long acting is Nadelol.
Classification—
According to the chemical structure— |
1. Very lipid soluble 2. Intermediate lipid soluble 3. Water soluble |
According to the receptor selectivity—non selective (β1+β2) and selective β1
*** in liver disease water soluble drug is given and in renal disease lipid soluble drug of correct dose is used.
Mechanism of Action—β-blockers block the β receptor mediated effects of sympathomimetics on the heart. Normally sympathomimetics stimulate the β receptors and increase the cardiac cyclic-AMP. The C-AMP then produces the sympathomimetic effects on the heart. When β blockers are given they block β receptors and decreases the heart rate, cardiac contraction thereby decreasing the myocardial O2 demand.
Mode of action—
1. Reduces the O2 demand of the heart by reducing the sympathetic activity on the heart.
2. Particularly reduces the exercise induced tachycardia, so that chances of angina during exercise reduce.
3. Reduces Renin-Angiotensin axis activity, so Angiotensin-II activity is reduced and ↓ BP.(reducing renin secretion by blocking the β1 receptors of the myoepithelial cells of the juxtra-glomerular apparatus)
4. β-blockers are anti-hypertensive which results in reduction of afterload causing reduction of myocardial O2 demands.
Renin angiotensinogen mechanism—
Renin ↓ ↓ ACE (lung)
Angiotensinogen (liver) Angiotensin I Angiotensin II
Now angiotensin II increases BP by three mechanisms—
1. ↑ aldosterone → ↑ Na-retention→ ↑ plasma volume→ ↑ CO→ ↑ BP
2. direct vasoconstriction→ ↑ BP
3. sympathetic activity→ ↑ BP
Indication of β blockers—
Angina
Hypertension
Arrhythmia
Hyperthyroidism
Migraine
Contraindication—
Bronchospasm (asthma)
Heart failure
A-V block
Adverse effects—
Bronchospasm
Nightmares
Insomnia
Hypotension
Delayed recovery from hypoglycemia
Advantages over nitrates—
1. No headache, flushing or syncopal attack. (in contrast to nifedipine and nitrates)
2. Less chance of developing tolerance thaitrates, rather with chronic use dose might have to be reduced.
3. (Ca++ channel blockers never develop tolerance)
- subsiding of chest pain
- decrease of blood pressure
- increase of heart rate.
- fainting or loss of consciousness (side effect that may occur upon change of posture)
- can be avoided in most patients if there is a nitrate- free interval of 10-12 hours per day.
- may be the result of depletion of intracellular suphydryl groups which prevents further nitrate metabolism and nitric oxide release.
- reversed within 18 hours of stopping nitrates.
- if tolerance is supected in the case of modified isosorbide dinitrate (and conventional preparations of isosorbide mononitrate) then the second of two daily doses can be given after about 8 hours rather than after 12 hours.
- there is no relationship to tolerance to adverse and therapeutic effects.
- toleance may develop in less than 48 hours after the initiation of treatment with nitrates.
Beta-blockers may be classified based on their ancillary pharmacological properties. Cardioselective agents have high affinity for cardiac β 1 and less affinity for bronchial and vascular β2 receptors compared with non-selective agents and this reduces (but does not abolish) β 2 receptor-mediated side effects. However, with increasing doses cardiac selectivity disappears. Lipid-soluble agents cross the blood-brain barrier more readily and are associated with a higher incidence of central side effects. Some beta-blockers have intrinsic sympathomimetic activity – ISA (i.e., they stimulate β receptors when background sympathetic nervous activity is low and block them when background sympathetic nervous activity is high). Adverse effects: BBs slow the rate of conduction at the atrio-ventricular node and are contraindicated in patients with second- and third-degree heart block. Sinus bradycardia is common and treatment should be stopped if patient is symptomatic or heart rate falls below 40 b/min. Because of blockade of pulmonary ß2 receptors, even small doses of BBs can cause bronchospasm (less common with cardioselective agents), and all beta-blockers are contraindicated in asthma. Blockade of ß receptors in the peripheral circulation causes vasoconstriction and may induce particularly in patients with peripheral circulatory insufficiency adverse affects such as cold extremities, Raynaud’s phenomenon, and intermittent claudication. Nevertheless, they are reasonably tolerated in patient with mild peripheral vascular disease. Lipid-soluble agents can cause central nervous system side effects of insomnia, nightmares and fatigue. Exercise capacity may be reduced by BBs and patients may experience tiredness and fatigue. BBs can worsen glucose intolerance and hyperlipidemia and in diabetic patients mask signs of hypoglycemia. However, diabetic hypertensive patients with previous MI should not be denied BB because of concerns about metabolic side effects.
For sustained daytime angina prophylaxis, nitrates are of limited value because “nitrate pauses” of about 12 h are appropriate if nitrate tolerance is to be avoided. If attacks occur during the day, ISDN, or its metabolite isosorbide mononitrate, may be given in the morning and at noon (e.g., ISDN 40 mg in extended- release capsules). Because of hepatic presystemic elimination, NTG is not suitable for oral administration. Continuous delivery via a transdermal patch would also not seem advisable because of the potential development of tolerance. With molsidomine, there is less risk of a nitrate tolerance; however, due to its potential carcinogenicity, its clinical use is restricted. The choice between calcium antagonists must take into account the differential effect of nifedipine versus verapamil or diltiazem on cardiac performance. When в-blockers are given, the potential consequences of reducing cardiac contractility (withdrawal of sympathetic drive) must be kept in mind. Since vasodilating в2-receptors are blocked, an increased risk of vasospasm cannot be ruled out. Therefore, monotherapy with в-blockers is recommended only in angina due to coronary sclerosis, but not in variant angina.
Myocardial infarction is caused by acute thrombotic occlusion of a coronary artery (A).
Therapeutic interventions aim to restore blood flow in the occluded vessel in order to reduce infarct size or to rescue ischemic myocardial tissue. In the area perfused by the affected vessel, inadequate supply of oxygen and glucose impairs the function of heart muscle: contractile force declines. In the great majority of cases, the left ventricle anterior or posterior wall) is involved. The decreased work capacity of the infarcted myocardium leads to a reduction in stroke volume (SV) and hence cardiac output (CO). The fall in blood pressure (RR) triggers reflex activation of the sympathetic system. The resultant stimulation of cardiac β-adrenoceptors elicits an increase in both heart rate and force of systolic contraction, which, in conjunction with an β-adrenoceptor- mediated increase in peripheral resistance, leads to a compensatory rise in blood pressure. In ATP-depleted cells in the infarct border zone, resting membrane potential declines with a concomitant increase in excitability that may be further exacerbated by activation of β-adrenoceptors. Together, both processes promote the risk of fatal ventricular arrhythmias. As a consequence of local ischemia, extracellular concentrations of H+ and K+ rise in the affected region, leading to excitation of nociceptive nerve fibers. The resultant sensation of pain, typically experienced by the patient as annihilating, reinforces sympathetic activation. The success of infarct therapy critically depends on the length of time between the onset of the attack and the start of treatment. Whereas some theraputic measures are indicated only after the diagnosis is confirmed, others necessitate prior exclusion of contraindications or can be instituted only in specially equipped facilities. Without exception, however, prompt action is imperative. Thus, a staggered treatment schedule has proven useful. The antiplatelet agent, ASA, is administered at the first suspected signs of infarction. Pain due to ischemia is treated predominantly with antianginal drugs (e.g., nitrates).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwB7VG6WaaY&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHTGtYsEJBo&feature=channel
The mechanism of drug action is central to the process of choosing a drug to treat any particular arrhythmia. Thus it is useful to consider first impulse generation at the cellular level. This in turn demands consideration of the ion channels underpinning impulse generation in different cardiac muscle cell types. It is the opening and closing of a range of different ion channels that leads to the distinct profiles of membrane potential which comprise cardiac action potentials. Therefore, we shall initially consider the electrophysiological characteristics of cardiac action potentials, aspects of ion channel function, and ion channels as sites of antiarrhythmic drug action.
Ventricular cells in particular also possess a distinct plateau phase, and the relatively long duration of the ventricular action potential helps make the ventricular tissue refractory to overexcitation which might otherwise tetanise the ventricular myocardium. The distinct action potential phases discussed above are sometimes referred to as phases 0 to 4: phase 0 is the action potential upstroke, phase 1 is the early repolarisation “notch” (evident immediately after the ventricular action potential peak , phases 2 and 3 describe plateau and late repolarisation (pacemaker cell action potentials without a distinct notch or plateau may lack distinct phases 1 and 2), while phase 4 is the period after repolarisation is complete (the resting level in non-pacemaker cells, and the pacemaker depolarisation in pacemaker cells).
FLOW OF IONIC CURRENT IN RELATION TO “EQUILIBRIUM POTENTIAL”
For a particular ionic species and given values of Co and Ci, there will be one membrane potential value), at which there is no net driving force for ions to flow across the membrane. For example, for sodium ions ENa lies near +70 mV; at potentials negative to this, sodium ions will flow down their concentration gradient (from outside to inside the cell) and generate a depolarising or inward current Beyond ENa (a situation encountered experimentally, but not physiologically), sodium ions would flow in the opposite direction Conversely, for potassium ions, EK lies near -90 mV, and at potentials positive to this potassium ions will flow down their concentration gradient (from inside to outside the cell) and generate repolarising or outward current . If the inside of the cell is made more negative than EK the direction of ion flow will be reversed With a knowledge of the normal intracellular and extracellular ion concentrations, it is possible to predict the contributions of sodium, calcium, and potassium channels in generating membrane potential depolarisation or repolarisation.
One further aspect of ion channel function should be covered before considering the roles played by individual ion channel typeschannel gating. Voltage operated channels are usually referred to as voltage gated, as biophysical measurements indicate that specific membrane potential regulated processes determine the magnitude and time course of ionic current flow across the range of ion channel types. This can be explained by considering an ion channel that does not pass current until a depolarising stimulus is applied. At rest, the channel is therefore considered to be closed . When a depolarising stimulus is applied, the membrane potential change is detected by the voltage sensorthe channel undergoes a conformational change and opens in order to allow ionic current to flow. The process describing the transition from the closed to open state is termed activation. The probability of channels moving to the open state usually depends on the magnitude of the voltage change (activation is therefore “voltage dependent”), and the speed with which channels move from the closed to the open state will determine the rate of activation. Some voltage dependent channels show only a voltage dependent activation process, but for many a second process also influences ionic current flow. If the depolarising stimulus is maintained, a second conformational change occurs in the ion channel. Part of the ion channel protein moves to occlude the channel pore such that, while the channel may be fully activated, it becomes poorly conducting
- Distinct ion channel types generate depolarising and repolarising currents during the action potential.
- From the existence of distinct ion channels with distinct roles arises the potential for drug classification and design.
- The fact that ion channels undergo voltage dependent state transitions means that, theoretically, drugs could bind to resting/closed (C), activated/open (O) or inactivated (I) states.8
Drugs which bind preferentially to open or inactivated channel states may exert effects that vary with stimulation frequency (or in vivo, with heart rate) and as such can show use dependence. For antiarrhythmic agents, an ideal channel blocking agent would have positive use dependenceshowing a greater inhibitory action at faster heart rates. Drugs binding preferentially to closed channels may either exert use independent actions or show “reverse use dependence,” in which the drug dissociates from its binding site during channel activation. With reverse use dependent blockade, faster rates of channel stimulation (or indeed heart rate) encourage greater dissociation than slower ates, resulting in comparatively less channel inhibition at faster than at slower rates.ANARHYTHMIC DRUGS (Continued) ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUGS (Continued)
CHANNELS INVOLVED IN PACEMAKING
CHANNELS INVOLVED IN ACTION POTENTIAL DEPOLARISATION
A further potassium channel should be mentioned, as it is likely to mediate the antiarrhythmic actions of adenosine. The extremely short half life of adenosine makes intravenous administration valuable in terminating tachycardias involving the AV node (either AV nodal re-entry or AV re-entry). In bolus form, adenosine has been shown to be highly effective against paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias that require AV nodal conduction for their maintenance.53 54 The cellular basis for the effect of adenosine appears to resemble that for acetylcholine. Acetylcholine activates a potassium current (IKACh), which is important in mediating parasympathetic effects on the sinoatrial2 and AV nodes.55 When activated, IKACh produces membrane potential hyperpolarisation; it thereby decreases automaticity and excitability. At the cellular level, adenosine activates a current (IKAdo) with properties identical to those of IKACh (for example, Belardinelli and colleagues56). Cellular studies on rabbit AV node suggest that activation of IKAdo is likely to be predominantly responsible for the action of adenosine, with possible supplementary effects on L type calcium channels.57 58
As shown in table 1, alterations in the genes underlying IKr and IKs are associated with LQT-2 and LQT-1. The channels for both IKr and IKs are multimeric, and alleles from both parents contribute to the channel complexes. Mutant channels expressed in oocytes or cell lines show loss of function. Channel kinetics, as well as reduced overall current, contribute to the loss of function (that is, a reduction in repolarising outward current). In contrast, mutations of sodium (SCN5A) channels cause a gain of function,71 72 in which a late persistent (depolarising) sodium current is produced because of defective inactivation of INa. Owing to the heterogeneous basis for congenital long QT syndrome, identification of the underlying cause is pivotal in deciding upon appropriate treatment. Provocation may distinguish between the different congenital LQT syndromes. While the QT interval shortens only minimally with exercise in LQT1 and LQT2, in patients with LQT3 it shortens significantly.70 73 Furthermore, torsade de pointes is precipitated by adrenergic stimulation (for example, during exercise) in LQT1, possibly because IKs normally predominates at high rates, and therefore reduced IKs would lead to inadequate shortening of the action potential.70 In contrast, most patients with LQT 3 experience more events at rest than on exertion.70 73
Another interesting group of patients providing a clear link between cellular abnormalities and clinical treatment are those with the Brugada syndrome.74 75 These patients have structurally normal hearts and right precordial ST segment elevation or right bundle branch block.76 The ECG abnormalities probably reflect exaggerated transmural differences in action potential configuration, especially within the right ventricular outflow tract. The end result is an increased risk of ventricular fibrillation within these families. One variant of the Brugada syndrome arises from a mutation of the SCN5A gene (the same gene that is implicated in LQT3),77 leading to a gain of function; hence drugs targeting the sodium channel may be clinically effective.
IMPLICATIONS OF GENETIC INSIGHTS In addition to the syndromes described above, our understanding of the role of genes in other conditions has also increased. The reader is referred to a recent and comprehensive review by Priori and colleagues. A clear result of the arrival of molecular biology in the clinical arena is that genetic testing may be available not only for diagnostic purposes in patients presenting with arrhythmias but also possibly for individuals who could benefit from prophylactic treatment to avoid sudden death. Increased genetic knowledge may also influence treatment strategy. For example, sodium channel blockers such as lignocaine and mexiletine may be effective in LQT-3, while LQT-2 would be expected to be respond to a different approach. Cloned channels encoded by HERG (the gene underlying channels for IKr) show currents that increase in size as external potassium concentration ([K]e) is raised and decrease as [K]e is lowered.60 Consistent with this experimental observation, Compton and colleagues have shown that abnormal repolarisation in patients with LQT-2 can be corrected by raising serum potassium.
However, while long QT syndrome and the Brugada syndrome may provide a clear route from cell to clinic, some common arrhythmias are not yet so accommodating. Refractory arrhythmias, for example, may be refractory because of the complex processes involved in their pathogenesis. These may include both electrical and structural remodelling. Electrical remodelling may be physiological and unrelated to cardiac disease (for example, atrial fibrillation may become self sustaining), or pathological in origin (alteration in the distribution of gap junctions between cells in diseased tissue). Structural remodelling may also be either physiological (for example, initial ventricular hypertrophy in response to hypertension) or pathological (cell hypertrophy in peri-infarct zones and cell loss with replacement fibrosis within infarcted regions). Therefore complex arrhythmias with a multifactorial aetiology may benefit from primary prevention targeted towards alleviation of diseases such as coronary occlusion or ventricular hypertrophy. A second line of attack may then be directed towards the electrophysiological sequelae of upstream events. Treatment must be tailored towards the aetiology of the arrhythmia, as drug treatment for ventricular tachycardia in one patient may be detrimental in another. Indeed, in the structurally abnormal heartfor example, after myocardial infarction or during congestive cardiac failuredrug efficacy has been limited and in these conditions antiarrhythmic drugs can have a significant proarrhythmic potential.
Re-evaluation of antiarrhythmic drug classification Another area that has experienced change owing to the increased information available from cellular cardiology is that of drug classification. Early approaches to antiarrhythmic drug development involved the identification of natural compounds with antiarrhythmic activity such as cinchona,85 or identification of antiarrhythmic effects of drugs licensed for other uses, primarily local anaesthetics, including lignocaine and its derivatives. Clinical studies verified the acceptability as antiarrhythmic agents of synthetic molecules such as procainamide. Further attempts were than made to produce related compounds with increased potency and reduced toxicity (for example, flecainide, lorcainide, and encainide). While this approach has provided many useful drugs for therapeutic use, the derived compounds have to varying degrees retained the adverse effect profiles of parent drugs. Progress in the development of newer antiarrhythmic drugs has not been as great as once anticipated, and the chance discovery of antiarrhythmic properties of drugs developed for other conditionsfor example, amiodarone (initially developed as an antianginal drug)has contributed significantly to the armoury available to the clinician.
In 1970, Vaughan Williams proposed a classification based on possible ways in which abnormal cardiac rhythms could be corrected or prevented. In this early classification, class I drugs act by reducing inward sodium current at concentrations not affecting the resting membrane potential. Class II drugs act by blocking sympathetic activity of the heart. Although not thought to affect the action potential of most myocardial cells, these drugs reduce the spontaneous rate of depolarisation of pacemaker cells under adrenergic stimulation and are therefore negatively chronotropic. They are also negatively dromotropic, as the AV node tends to be under greater sympathetic drive than the sinoatrial node for which vagal tone normally predominates. Class III drugs prolong action potential duration. They do not specifically affect any single factor involved in repolarisation (although in reality most class III drugs exert potassium channel blocking actions). They are able to alter the activity of several different ion channel conductances at a cellular level, making their impact upon the action potential quite complex. In general, they prolong action potential duration and hence prolong the length of the refractory period. In a separate class was placed diphenylhydantoin, a centrally acting drug.
In 1974, Singh and Hauswirth modified the classification, with two major changes. First, lignocaine and diphenylhydantoin were placed in a separate class, because at low concentrations and at low external potassium concentrations, they had little effect upon the action potential or cardiac conduction. Secondly, a separate class (now denoted class IV) was introduced to accommodate calcium channel blockers, which (as described earlier) predominantly affect regions in which action potential depolarisation depends on ICa,L. In a further development, class I drugs were subclassified by Harrison according to their effect upon action potential upstroke and duration. Additional studies showed that the subclassification separated class I drugs according to the rate of recovery of INa channels from blockade. Class 1a drugs were intermediate between class Ib drugs, with fast recovery time constants less than one second, and class Ic drugs, with relatively slower recovery time constants of more than 15 seconds.
The “Singh-Hauswirth-Harrison-Vaughan Williams” (S-H-H-VW) classification is summarised. Many antiarrhythmic drugs have more than one class of action (for example, racemic sotalol has class II and class III activity and amiodarone has class I-IV actions). Moreover, some drugs within a particular class may differ in their clinical effects owing to subtle (but significant) differences in their mechanism of action at the ion channel level. In addition, there are some antiarrhythmic drugs (for example, digoxin and adenosine) which cannot be fitted into the S-H-H-VW I-IV classification.
While the S-H-H-VW classification has been valuable, the limitations of inadequate correlations between drug mechanism, arrhythmia mechanism, and therapeutic efficacy gave rise to the “Sicilian Gambit” approach to antiarrhythmic treatment. This approach to arrhythmia management, formulated by the European Society of Cardiology working group,94 seeks the critical mechanisms responsible for arrhythmogenesis to identify a “vulnerable parameter” or “Achilles heel” of the arrhythmia concerned. This would enable the clinician to select a drug on the basis of its mechanism of action and not empirically. This approach complements well those recent advances in our understanding of molecular biology (for example, cloning and sequencing of ion channels and receptors) that have raised hopes for a “target oriented” approach to antiarrhythmic treatment. There are, however, two fundamental issues that might hinder this approach to drug selection. First, an Achilles heel is not always (yet) identifiable for many arrhythmias, and in some cases there may be more than one Achilles heel, some of which are not involved in arrhythmogenesis. In addition, there are drugs classified within the S-H-H-VW classification that have multiple electrophysiological targets; this may preclude them from being selective for any one particular Achilles heel. Second, consideration of drug action based on multiple targets (ion channels, receptors, and second messenger systems) and the “spread sheet” approach advanced in the Sicilian Gambit94 generates a degree of complexity absent from the S-H-H-VW classification, and which may hinder acceptance of this approach.95 Against this, however, a major advantage of the Sicilian Gambit approach is that it provides a framework within which the ever increasing information on arrhythmogensis and drug action can be readily accommodated and considered.(for example, Members of the Sicilian Gambit96)
Our increasing knowledge of the basic electrophysiological and genetic characteristics of ion channels, the cellular actions of antiarrhythmic agents, their effects on animal models, and the results of clinical trials should help guide future rational drug development and classification. In a recent article,97 Camm and Yap summarise attributes for future antiarrhythmic agents, including: appropriate modification of the arrhythmia substrate, suppression of arrhythmia triggers, efficacy in pathologic tissues and states, positive rate/use dependent effects, similar efficacy in oral and parenteral formulations, similar efficacy in arrhythmias and their surrogates, few side effects, and cardiac selective ion channel blockade.
One of the central issues will be whether approaches which focus on a single ion channel target offer more promise than approaches based on compounds with “polypharmacological” (multiple ion channel) effects. Recently discovered ion channelssuch as the ultrarapid delayed rectifier (IK,ur) in atrial tissue98may offer new, alternative drug targets. Importantly, the reverse use dependence associated with some drugs with class III (predominantly IKr) blocking actions might be taken as suggesting that either drugs against alternative targets to IKr or drugs with multiple effects may be superior to selective IKr blockers alone.
Unfortunately, the emerging picture is not as clear as this. While the results of the SWORD (survival with oral d-sotalol) trial indicate that d-sotalol increases mortality and is therefore unsuitable for use,45 the same does not appear to be true for dofetilide. Dofetilide is a potent and selective blocker of IKr, which, although associated with reverse use dependent effects on the action potential at the cellular level,49 has a profile that is not clearly reverse use dependent in humans (for example, Bashir and colleagues99). The drug appears to be reasonably well tolerated and at some concentrations is effective at suppressing ventricular tachycardia.99 Moreover, its use does not seem to be associated with significantly increased mortality, and with only a low incidence of torsade de pointes. Quite why dofetilide appears to be safer than d-sotalol is not entirely clear, though there is some experimental evidence that the class III effects of d-sotalol are much more sensitive to extracellular potassium levels than those of dofetilide.44 At this stage, it would appear premature to rule out selective IKr blockade as a viable antiarrhythmic strategy.
IKs blockade may, in principle, offer an attractive alternative or supplementary approach to IKr inhibition. Azimilide is a relatively new agent effective at inhibiting both IKr and IKs.101 Data from experiments in which IKs blocking effects of the drug on the action potential have been estimated suggested that the IKs block alone was associated with rate independent action potential prolongation.The overall drug effect on the action potential (involving combined IKr and IKs actions) shows some variations between experimental studies, with reports of either some reverse use dependence or a rate independent action on effective refractory period.104 Azimilide may be effective against both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and, while it is too early to comment with certainty on its efficacy and safety in humans, initial signs appear promising.101 Several clinical trials including the ALIVE (azimilide post-infarct survival evaluation) study were ongoing at the time of writing.
Other investigative agents with polypharmacological effects include ibutilide and tedisamil. Ibutilide has an interesting pharmacological profile in that in addition to affecting IKr it also appears to induce a sustained sodium current, an effect that would be synergistic in prolonging the action potential.106 Tedisamil blocks IKr and the transient outward potassium current (ITO).107 It has been shown to be effective against ventricular fibrillation in a rabbit model108 and it prolongs the monophasic action potential in humans.109 Dronedarone, an investigational drug related to amiodarone, may be an agent of particular interest.97 Like its parent compound, dronedarone may be expected to exert multiple S-H-H-VW effects and thereby have wide ranging efficacy. The results of trials of this and other agents with polypharmacological effects will be important in the debate about whether the future development of antiarrhythmic agents lies in single or multiple ion channel targets. As the underlying basis for the generation and maintenance of particular arrhythmias becomes increasingly understood, so will our understanding of the nature of any associated Achilles heel or vulnerable parameter. This knowledge, together with ongoing revision of drug classification according to target/action, is likely to refine pharmacotherapeutic approaches to clinical arrhythmia management.
This work was supported by grants from the British Heart Foundation, the United Bristol Healthcare Trust, and the Wellcome Trust. KCRP was supported by a British Heart Foundation clinical training fellowship, and JCH was supported by a Wellcome Trust research fellowship. We thank Kathryn Yuill for providing the ionic current record for figure 3B, and Helen Wallis for comments on the manuscript.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xw4nDMgTOrw&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x67vRkooZDc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwnpEoQDzo0&feature=related
Antihypertensive Drugs
Goal
The goal of this session is to make students familiar with the pharmacology of antihypertensive drugs and with basic principles of rational pharmacotherapy of essential hypertension, hypertensive urgency and hypertensive emergency.
Learning Objectives
After attending this session and reading provided information, student should be able to able to:
1. Discuss the pharmacological properties of various oral antihypertensive drugs
2. List the properties of an “ideal” antihypertensive drug
3. List the first-line drugs for treatment of essential hypertension
4. Discuss the main adverse effects of first-line antihypertensive drugs
5. List target blood pressure and at least two drugs of choice for hypertensive patients with co-existing diseases
6. Discuss the rationale for combining antihypertensive drugs
7. List the drugs for treatment of hypertensive crisis (emergency and urgency)
8. Discuss the treatment algorithm for the hypertensive patientlood Pressure Levels fr Adults
I. Pharmacology of Oral Antihypertensive Drugs
Algorithm for the treatment of hypertension.
Activity of angiotensinogen in relation to increased blood pressure.
1.1 Diuretics
A. Thiazides: Bendroflumethiazide [NATURETIN]; Benzthiazide [EXNA]; Chlorothiazide [DIURIL]; Hydrochlorothiazide [HYDRODIURIL]; Hydroflumethiazide [SALURON]; Methyclothiazide [ENDURON]; Polythiazide [RENESE]
B. Thiazide-like: Chlorthalidone [HYGROTON]; Indapamide [LOXOL]; Metolazone [MYKROX, ZAROXOLYN]
Mechanism of action: Inhibition of the sodium/chloride symport in distal convoluted tubule and subsequent reduction in sodium and chloride re-absorption. The initial drop in BP is due to increased sodium excretion and water loss and reduced extracellular fluid and plasma volume, whereas the chronic action of TZD diuretics is due to reduction of peripheral vascular resistance. There is evidence that TZDs have some direct vasodilating properties and decreases vasocontrictor response of vascular smooth muscle cells to other vasoconstricting agents.
At low doses TZDs (12.5-25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide [HCTZ] or its equivalent) are relatively well tolerated. Very rarely they cause severe rash, thrombocytopenia and leucopenia. The most common side effect is hypokalemia. Reduction in serum potassium varies with the dose and is between 0.3-1 mmol. Thiazides may increase plasma lipid elevation, and induce glucose intolerance and hyperuricemia. These adverse effects are less frequent with low doses. Importantly, the metabolic side effects of diuretics do not compromise their expected beneficial effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
As antihypertensive agents TZDs may be particularly useful in elderly patients, African Americans, patients with mild or incipient heart failure, when cost is crucial, and in patients with poor control of salt intake. Low dose TZDs are combined with other first line antihypertensive drugs. The use of TZDs should be avoided in patients with NIDDM, hyperlipidemia or gout.
C. Na Channel Inhibitors (K-Sparing): Amiloride [MIDAMOR]; Triamterene [DYRENIUM, MAXZIDE]
Potassium-sparing diuretics produce little reduction in blood pressure themselves. They may be useful in combination with other diuretics to prevent hypokalemia.
D. Aldosterone Antagonists (K-Sparing): Sironolactone [ALDACTONE]; Eplerenone [ INSPRA™]
Spironolactone is a specific aldosterone antagonist, with mild antihypertensive effect. The hypotensive mechanism of spironolactone is unknown. It is possibly due to the ability of the drug to inhibit aldosterone’s effect on arteriole smooth muscle. Spironolactone also can alter the extracellular-intracellular sodium gradient across the membrane. Spironolactone inhibits the effects of aldosterone on the distal renal tubules. Unlike amiloride and triamterene, spironolactone exhibits its diuretic effect only in the presence of aldosterone, and these effects are enhanced in patients with hyperaldosteronism. Aldosterone antagonism enhances sodium, chloride, and water excretion, and reduces the excretion of potassium, ammonium, and phosphate. Spironolactone improves survival and reduces hospitalizations in patients with severe heart failure (NYHA Class IV) when added to conventional therapy (ACE inhibitor and a loop diuretic, with or without digoxin).
Eplerenone is approved for treatment of hypertension and for the treatment of post-myocardial infarction patients with heart failure. It is a more selective aldosterone receptor antagonist, similar in action to spironolactone, with lower incidence of side effects (gynecomastia) due to its reduced affinity for glucocorticoid, androgen, and progesterone receptors. It is more expensive than spironolactone.
1.2. Beta Blockers
There are 15 Beta blockers (BB) on the market in the US. All BBs except esmolol and sotalol are approved for treatment of hypertension (13) and one or more of following indications: angina pectoris, myocardial Infarction, ventricular arrhythmia, migraine prophylaxis, heart failure and perioperative hypertension. Only sotalol delays ventricular repolarization and is effective for maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrilation. Esmolol has short half-life and is given for hypertensive (perioperative) urgency and for atrial arrhythmias after cardiac surgery.
Beta-blockers act by blocking the action of catecholamines at adrenergic receptors throughout the circulatory system and other organs. BBs major effect is to slow the heart rate and reduce force of contraction. BBs via inhibition of receptors at justaglomerular cells inhibit renin release.
Beta-blockers may be classified based on their ancillary pharmacological properties. Cardioselective agents have high affinity for cardiac β 1 and less affinity for bronchial and vascular β2 receptors compared with non-selective agents and this reduces (but does not abolish) β 2 receptor-mediated side effects. However, with increasing doses cardiac selectivity disappears. Lipid-soluble agents cross the blood-brain barrier more readily and are associated with a higher incidence of central side effects. Some beta-blockers have intrinsic sympathomimetic activity – ISA (i.e., they stimulate β receptors when background sympathetic nervous activity is low and block them when background sympathetic nervous activity is high). Therefore, theoretically BBs with ISA are less likely to cause bradycardia, bronchospasm, peripheral vasoconstriction, to reduce cardiac output, and to increase lipids. BBs with ISA are less frequently used in the treatment of hypertension.
Beta Blocker |
Relative Cardiac Selectivity |
Intrinsic Sympathomimetic Activity |
Daily Dosing Frequency |
Lipid Solubility |
b1 + a1 |
Acebutolol SECTRAL |
++ |
+ |
2 |
Moderate |
– |
Atenolol TENORMIN |
++ |
– |
1 |
Low |
– |
Betaxolol KERIONE |
++ |
– |
1 |
Low |
– |
Bisoprolol ZEBETA |
++ |
– |
1 |
Low |
– |
Carteolol CARTROL |
– |
++ |
1 |
Low |
– |
Carvedilol COREG |
– |
– |
2 |
High |
+ |
Esmolol BREVIBLOC |
+ |
– |
i.v. |
Moderate |
– |
Labetalol TRANDATE NORMODYNE |
– |
– |
2 |
Moderate |
+ |
Metoprolol LOPRESSOR |
+ |
– |
1 or 2 |
Mod. / High |
– |
Nadolol CORGARD |
– |
– |
1 |
Low |
– |
Penbutol LEVATOL |
– |
+ |
1 |
High |
– |
Pindolol VISKEN |
|
+++ |
2 |
Moderate |
– |
Propranolol INDERAL |
– |
– |
2 |
High |
– |
Timolol BLOCADREN |
– |
– |
2 |
Low / Mod. |
– |
Lipophilic beta blockers may enter CNS more extensively and readily which may lead to increased CNS side effects. Labetalol and carvedilol have both β1– and α1-blocking properties, and decrease heart rate and peripheral vascular resistance. Both agents possess the side effects common for both classes of drug. Beta-blockers tend to be less effective in the elderly and in black hypertensives. To reduce side effects in hypertensive patients it is recommended to use a beta-blocker with high cardioselectivity, low lipid solubility and long half-life that allows once daily dosing.
Adverse effects: BBs slow the rate of conduction at the atrio-ventricular node and are contraindicated in patients with second- and third-degree heart block. Sinus bradycardia is common and treatment should be stopped if patient is symptomatic or heart rate falls below 40 b/min. Because of blockade of pulmonary ß2 receptors, even small doses of BBs can cause bronchospasm (less common with cardioselective agents), and all beta-blockers are contraindicated in asthma. Blockade of ß receptors in the peripheral circulation causes vasoconstriction and may induce particularly in patients with peripheral circulatory insufficiency adverse affects such as cold extremities, Raynaud’s phenomenon, and intermittent claudication. Nevertheless, they are reasonably tolerated in patient with mild peripheral vascular disease. Lipid-soluble agents can cause central nervous system side effects of insomnia, nightmares and fatigue. Exercise capacity may be reduced by BBs and patients may experience tiredness and fatigue. BBs can worsen glucose intolerance and hyperlipidemia and in diabetic patients mask signs of hypoglycemia. However, diabetic hypertensive patients with previous MI should not be denied BB because of concerns about metabolic side effects.
1.3. Alpha-1 adrenergic receptor blockers ( …. OSIN )
Prazosin [MINIPRESS] Terazosin [HYTRIN] Doxazosin [CARDURA]
Alfuzosin [UROXATRAL] Tamsulosin [FLOMAX]
The β1-adrenoceptor blockers produce vasodilatation by blocking the action of norepinephrine at post-synaptic β1 receptors in arteries and veins. This results in a fall in peripheral resistance, without a compensatory rise in cardiac output. Doxazosin, terazosin, and, less commonly, prazosin are used as oral agents in the treatment of hypertension. They are relatively more selective for a1b – and a1d-receptors which are involved in vascular smooth muscle contraction. Alfuzosin and tamsulosin are used for symptomatic treatment of begin prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), since compared to other oral α1-blockers, they have less antihypertensive effects and are relatively more selective as antagonists at the α1a subtype, the primary subtype located in the prostate.
Based on ALLHAT study data, alpha blockers are not longer considered first-line drug for treatment of hypertension. They are drugs of choice for treatment of hypertensive patient with BPH. Adverse effects include first dose hypotension, dizziness, lethargy, fatigue, palpitation, syncope, peripheral edema and incontinence.
1.4. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs; … PRIL)
Benazepril [LOTENSIN] Captopril [CAPOTEN] Enalapril [VASOTEC] Fosinopril [MONOPRIL] Lisinopril [PRINIVIL, ZESTRIL] Moexipril [UNIVASC] Perindopril [ACEON] Quinapril [ACCUPRIL] Ramipril [ALTACE] Spirapril [RENOMAX] Trandolapril [MAVIK]
ACEIs block the renin-angiotensin system activity by inhibiting the conversion of the biologically inactive angiotensin I to angiotensin II, a powerful vasoconstrictor and stimulator of release of sodium-retaining hormone aldosterone. These effects result in decreased peripheral vascular resistance and reduction in aldosterone plasma levels. ACE inhibitors also reduce the breakdown of the vasodilator bradykinin, which may enhance their action but is also responsible for their most common side effect, cough. ACE inhibitors reduce central adrenergic tone and influence renal hemodynamics (i.e., reduce intraglomerular hypertension) that may have beneficial effects in proteinuric renal disease.
The ACEIs tend to be less effective as antihypertensives in patients who tend to have lower renin levels (African Americans and elderly). This relative ineffectiveness can be overcome by using high doses of ACEI or by adding a diuretic. Captopril is short acting, sulfhydryl-group containing agent; Beenazepril, enalapril, fosinopril, moexipril, quinapril, ramipril, spirapril are pro-drugs that in the body have to be converted to active metabolites; and lisinopril is active non metabolized ACEI.
In addition to treatment of hypertension, various ACEIs are approved for treatment of heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, diabetic nephropathy, and acute MI.
Adverse effects include cough (most frequent 3-10%), hypotension (particularly in volume depleted patients), hyperkalemia, angioedema, renal Insufficiency, and fetal injury (2nd & 3rd trimesters).
1.5. Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists (ARBs; …SARTAN )
Losartan [COZAAR] Valsartan [DIOVAN] Irbesartan [AVAPRO] Candesartan [ATACAND]
Eprosartan [TEVETEN] Tasosartan [VERDIA] Telmisartan [MICARDIS}
Similar to ACEI, angiotensin II receptor antagonists inhibit the activity of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Sartans act by blocking the angiotensin II type-1 receptors. As they do not inhibit the breakdown of bradykinin, they do not cause cough. However, they may lack the additional physiological benefits that rises in bradykinin levels may bring. ARBs have similar physiological effects to ACE inhibitors, produce similar falls in blood pressure and have same indications and adverse effects profile (except for the cough).
1.6. Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs)
CCBs exert their clinical effects by blocking the L-class of voltage gated calcium channels. By blocking transmembrane entry of calcium into arteriolar smooth muscle cells and cardiac myocytes, CCBs inhibit the excitation-contraction process. CCBs are a heterogeneous group of drugs. Dihydropyridines are primarily potent vasodilators of peripheral and coronary arteries. Non-dihydropiridines Verapamil and Diltiazem are moderate vasodilators with significant cardiac effects (Table2).
Pharmacologic Effects of Calcium Channel Blockers |
|||
Effect |
Verapamil
CALAN, CALAN SR COVERA-HS, ISOPTIN, ISOPTIN SR VERELAN VERELAN PM |
Diltiazem
Cardizem, Cardizem CD Cardizem LA, Cardizem Lyo-Ject, Cardizem SR Cartia XT, Dilacor XR Diltia XT, Taztia XT Tiamate, Tiazac® |
Dihydropyridines
Amlodipine [NORVASC] Felodipine [PLENDIL] Isradipine [DYNACIRC] Nicardipine [CARDENE] Nifedipine PROCARDIA ADALAT] |
Peripheral Vasodilation |
|
|
|
Heart Rate |
¯¯ |
¯ |
|
Cardiac Contractility |
¯¯ |
¯ |
0 / ¯ |
SA/AV nodal conduction |
¯ |
¯ |
0 |
Coronary Blood Flow |
|
|
|
Adverse effects: Most common side effect of CCBs is ankle edema. This is caused by vasodilatation, which also causes headache, flushing and palpitation, especially with short-acting dihydropyridines. Some of these side effects can be offset by combining a calcium channel blocker with a beta blocker. Verapamil and Diltiazem cause constipation. More seriously, they can cause heart block, especially in those with underlying conduction problems. Verapamil, diltiazem and short-acting dihydropyridines should be avoided in patients with heart failure.
Central Alpha-2 Agonist
Methyl-dopa [ALDOMET], Clonidine [CATAPRES]
These drugs stimulate central a2 adrenergic receptors in rostral ventrolateral medulla which control sympathetic outflow. The resulting decrease in central sympathetic tone leads to a
fall in both cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance.
The drugs cause sedation, dry mouth and fluid retention. Methyl-dopa requires conversion to alpha-methyl norepinephrine, and clonidine does not.
Methyl-dopa is safe in pregnancy and this is the only indication for its use as a first line agent in hypertension. Clonidine has rapid onset of action (30-60 min) and is used in hypertensive urgency. However, it is short acting agent, and transdermal patch system was developed to provide 7-day constant dose of drug. Abrupt withdrawal of clonidine therapy may result in “rebound hypertension.”
A new centrally acting drug, moxonidine, acts on central imidazoline receptors and is hoped to have less side effects.
Peripheral Vasodilators
Hydralazine [APRESOLINE], Minoxidil [LONITEN]
These agents act directly to relax vascular smooth muscle, thereby reducing peripheral vascular resistance. Within this class of drugs, the oral vasodilators Hydralazine and Minoxidil are used for long-term outpatient therapy of hypertension. They are second line of drugs for treatment of hypertension and must be combined with first line antihypertensives to offset some of their adverse effects. Decreased arterial resistance and blood pressure elicit compensatory responses, mediated by baroreceptors and the sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (reflex tachycardia, fluid and sodium retention). High doses of hydralazine may also induce, particularly in slow acetilators, “lupus-like” syndrome (arthralgia, myalgia, skin rashes, and fever). The effect of minoxidil appears to result from the opening of potassium channels in smooth muscle membranes by its active metabolite minoxidil sulfate. Even more than with hydralazine, the use of minoxidil is associated with reflex sympathetic stimulation and sodium and fluid retention. Minoxidil must be used in combination with a b-blocker and a loop diuretic. Headache, sweating, and hirsutism, are common adverse effects of minoxidil. Topical minoxidil (as Rogaine) is now used as a stimulant to hair growth for correction of baldness.
The parenteral vasodilators (nitroprusside
1.9. Adrenergic Neural Terminal Inhibitors
Guanethidine [ISMELIN], Guanadrel [HYCOREL], Reserpine
1.10. Ganglionic Blockers (Mecamylamine [INVERSINE])
II. Antihypertensive Drugs for Treatment of Hypertensive Crisis
1. Definition of Hypertensive Crisis
§ Normal blood pressure: SBP <120, DBP <80 mmHg
§ Prehypertension: SBP 120-139; DBP 80-89 mmHg
§ Hypertension Stage 1: SBP140-159; DBP 90-99 mmHg
§ Hypertension Stage 2: SBP >160; DBP >100 mmHg
§ Hypertensive crisis (Hypertensive Emergency vs. Hypertensive Urgency)
2. Therapeutic principles in hypertensive crisis
2.1. Therapeutic objectives in hypertensive crisis:
· For hypertensive urgency therapeutic goal is to reduce BP during the period of 1-24 hours.
8. Drugs given by intermittent intravenous infusion:
– Labetalol: combined a+b adrenergic receptor blocker
– Enalaprilat: ACE inhibitor, active metabolite of pro-drug enalapril.
III. Selection of Antihypertensive Drug (s)
· Properties of the “ideal” antihypertensive drug
· Presence of other risk factors for cardiovascular disease & target organ damage
· JNC VII Therapeutic Algorithm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKxQgjj2yVU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHTGtYsEJBo&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQAx25i4_0I&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJKkYGe7a3k&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT9HhHtQruA&feature=related