Community and Public Health Nursing

PRACTICUM

 

Poor families. Homelessness. Vulnerable Populations. Poverty and Homelessness.

 

 

After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

 

·        Define vulnerability

·        Describe vulnerable population groups

·        Analyze the effects of public policy on vulnerable populations.

·        Give examples of how a community health nurse might plan interventions for vulnerable groups.

·        Analyze the concepts of poverty and homelessness.

·        Describe the social, political, cultural, and environmental factors that influence Poverty.

·        Discuss community health nursing interventions for poor and homeless individuals.

 

 

Introduction

 

What is vulnerability?

A starting point for defining health-related vulnerability is the concept of need. Social consensus may fray at the margin when one asks which medication or service is most efficacious or cost-effective for a particular diagnosis. Yet few would dispute the basic argument that lack of financial resources should not block access to widely-accepted treatment that significantly extends life or relieves morbidity. This goal of providing treatment and preventive interventions is only partly based on observed consumer demand for health services. Health care may be the most prominent "merit good" -- a good for which social altruism includes a desire that all citizens receive a certain minimum level.15 Health care is not the only such good. In-kind subsidies for housing, preschool education, and food are often justified in similar terms.16 Yet the fundamental nature of health for individual well-being has led policymakers to pay special attention to the distribution of health-status and to the distribution of health care services across the population. Labeling health care a merit good does not imply a particular institutional arrangement to provide insurance coverage or to provide health care services. But it does indicate the social consensus in favor of assuring access to some minimal quality and quantity of services for every member of American society. the core idea underlying vulnerability is that individuals face significant obstacles to the receipt of medical treatment and preventive services, as well as obstacles to obtaining health insurance coverage.

 For example, 27 percent of families in which all family members are uninsured report that they had delayed or not received needed health care, compared to only 8 percent of those with all family members insured. Similarly, 15 percent of Hispanic families reported delaying or not receiving care, compared to 11 percent for whites and 10 percent forblacks.

Differences in use of care are not simply a function of insurance status, but also occur among those who have the same insurance coverage. So, a simple comparison of 1987 expenditure levels for Medicare beneficiaries shows average spending of $4,316 for whites compared to $4,049 for blacks; $4,523 for high school graduates compared to $4,959 for college graduates, and $3,648 for those who are poor, compared to $4,661 for those with high income.

Much of health services research on vulnerable populations has focused on understanding the nature of the access and utilization barriers faced even by individuals with insurance coverage.

Our focus here is on how vulnerable populations face barriers to insurance coverage itself.

The obstacles to health insurance coverage can arise from many factors, but several prove especially important for the populations of concern in this paper:

__ medical and social needs that hinder access to traditional insurance markets

__ general economic disadvantage, including both low income and limited access to employment-related health insurance

__ discrimination based on race, ethnicity, language, or citizenship status

__ impaired decision-making and proxy decision-making.

To clarify these issues, consider an informal model of the factors affecting the demand for medical services and health insurance.iii We can posit that consumers demand for medical services can be represented through a demand equation:

 

DemandCare = f (Health Status, Income, Direct Costs, Indirect Costs, Knowledge, Social Norms, X)

 while insurance demand is derived from their demand for care and other factors:

DemandInsurance = f (DemandCare, Price, Income, Alternative Sources of Care,

Information, Risk Preferences, X)

Medical services are supplied by medical providers:

 

SupplyCare = f (payment rates, input costs, provider norms, X)

 

where X in each equation represents other factors, including individual-specific preferences.

In this simple model, consumer demand for medical care is a function of health status, income, the direct costs of paying for care, the indirect costs (such as transportation or time costs) associated with obtaining care, knowledge about medical care and health, and the relevant social and cultural norms of one’s communities. Demand for insurance is derived from the demand for medical care, plus additional factors, including the price of insurance, income, the availability of alternative sources of care (such as the availability of uncompensated care from

medical care services is related to insurance payment rates, the relevant input costs, and provider norms concerning treatment.

The most basic vulnerability is the existence of ill-health, disease, and disability. Insurance starts with the presence of risk, and then spreads the financial burdens of these risks.mIn the model above, demand for care is related to health status, and this demand for care motivates the purchase of insurance. Hence the problem of adverse selection in voluntary insurance markets. Although health status and the existence of disease underlie consumer demand for medical care and health insurance, those who are less likely to need medical care may act on this knowledge as well, and therefore not purchase coverage.

This differential motivation for insurance purchase presents important difficulties for risk-pooling within an unregulated insurance market. In extreme cases the insurance market may unravel completely. Even in less extreme cases, insurers respond to this asymmetric information by imposing restrictions on insurance policies in terms of waiting periods, pre-existing condition exclusions, and cost sharing requirements that impede consumers in poor health from obtaining insurance.

A second vulnerability arises from economic disadvantage. Families with low incomes are less able to buy insurance, and are less able to purchase care directly. The problems of low income for medical care and health insurance are multifaceted. The problem is, in the first instance, one of constrained resources, and competing priorities in low-income households for purchasing other necessities. Second, the primary mechanism for obtaining health insurance for those under age 65 is through employment-provided coverage. But many low-income Americans have a weak connection to stable jobs, and the jobs that low income workers do hold often not provide health benefits.18 Moreover, when health benefits are offered, they may require premiums, especially to obtain coverage for dependents. People with low incomes may place a higher value on purchasing other goods and services, and are especially price-sensitive in

their purchase of health coverage. Economic disadvantage can also be caused by poor health, which can hinder subsequent labor market performance, thereby limiting income and access to employment-linked health insurance. From the perspective of individual consumers, the lack of health insurance increases the direct costs for obtaining medical services. The indirect costs of medical services include the costs of transportation and the time costs for obtaining services,

A third type of vulnerability arises from race, ethnicity, language, and citizenship status. In part, the disadvantages associated with race and ethnicity are due to poverty and low income. Yet these categories are also distinct from economic need, raising both the issue of potential discrimination, as well as issues concerning information, cultural norms, and cross-cultural difficulties that may impede access to medical services and health insurance. Discrimination based on race/ethnicity poses complex barriers to insurance coverage and to the effective use of the health care delivery system. Real and perceived discrimination has many effects for the individual and for health care providers. This issue has received increasing research attention, especially regarding medical encounters for African-American patients. For many reasons, Hispanic/Latino citizens, non-citizens, and recent citizens are the largest single population of uninsured men, women, and children in the U.S.19 In addition, for members of many ethnic groups, language barriers and complex barriers associated with immigration status pose significant barriers to the take-up of nominally-provided public coverage, and create difficulties for obtaining appropriate medical services.

A fourth aspect of vulnerability concerns individuals' ability to act as effective agents on their own behalf. Although one usually assumes that individuals are the best judges of their wellbeing, competent decisionmakers, and able to negotiate with and advocate for themselves or their children, this assumption comes into question for several populations of greatest policy concern.

Individuals with psychiatric disorders, cognitive impairment, or substance use disorders face important barriers to effective and informed decision-making. They are unlikely to be sophisticated consumers, and may be unaware of entitlements to health insurance coverage.

Individuals experiencing social stigma and those with social and economic disadvantages are also likely to be less effective agents within the health care delivery system. Moreover, social stigma associated with welfare and other means-tested programs often impedes individuals from applying for the programs for which they are eligible.

The main federal and federal-state programs that currently provide health insurance are:

·        Medicare,

·        Medicaid,

·        the State Children's Health Insurance Programs.

 

More than 80 percent of Medicare recipients are over the age of 65. However, five million Medicare beneficiaries are of working age, making Medicare a prominent source of coverage across the adult population.

More than 90 percent of under-65 Medicare beneficiaries are eligible by virtue of disability. A smaller number are Medicare eligible through the end-stage renal disease program or are eligibleas widows or widowers of Medicare beneficiaries.21

Medicaid serves a more varied range of recipient groups, including families receiving cash welfare benefits, people with disabilities who receive federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and children in low-income families. Medicaid also serves certain persons with high medical expenses, some of whom live in the community, and many others who are residents of nursing homes.

Important expansions of means-tested insurance programs occurred during the 1980s and 1990s, which were largely directed towards children. The most important of these requirements were mandates enacted as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Acts (OBRA) of 1989 and 1990, which required that the states extend Medicaid eligibility to all children under the age of six with family income below 133 percent of the poverty line, as well as children born after September 30, 1983, with family income below 100 percent of the poverty line.

These government programs are an important part of the current approach for providing health insurance for the vulnerable. Potential recipients face decisions regarding whether to enroll in programs. Recipients’ behavior while enrolled affects their further eligibility for insurance coverage. Welfare reform also changed the complex policy and administrative relationships across programs. Even before welfare reform, public insurance programs reflected significant institutional complexity inherited from the history of policy enactments. The range of American social welfare programs includes health insurance programs that may overlap with each other, as well as various cash assistance, social policy, employment and training, etc. programs that may serve, separately, the needs of vulnerable groups. Because eligibility for one program might be conditioned on eligibility for another, or non-eligibility for a related program, the programs can serve as enrollment vehicles for each other. For example, cash assistance has

traditionally been the main outreach vehicle to enroll low-income women and children into Medicaid programs

 

 

Some populations are considered vulnerable if there are legitimate concerns about their competency to understand information presented to them and make reasoned choices. These populations include people with psychiatric, cognitive, or developmental disorders and substance abusers.

Health of Vulnerable Populations

As our state prospers in many ways, some segments are invariably left behind. Some have chronic illness. Some are migrant workers. Others live in rural communities with limited access to health care. Most are hardworking and aren’t looking for a handout. But they could use a hand. Through our Health of Vulnerable Populations focus area, we are committed to improving the well-being of North Carolinians that need it the most.

The health care debate is focused on achieving universal access through a restructured payment system. Final acceptance will be dependent on meeting the needs of the employed and educated. The special needs of vulnerable populations, though included in the Health Security Act, are less likely to be given priority.

 

which may also be important for the economically disadvantaged in geographically isolated

areas.

A third type of vulnerability arises from race, ethnicity, language, and citizenship status.

In part, the disadvantages associated with race and ethnicity are due to poverty and low income. Yet these categories are also distinct from economic need, raising both the issue of potential discrimination, as well as issues concerning information, cultural norms, and cross-cultural difficulties that may impede access to medical services and health insurance. Discrimination based on race/ethnicity poses complex barriers to insurance coverage and to the effective use of the health care delivery system. Real and perceived discrimination has many effects for the

individual and for health care providers. This issue has received increasing research attention, especially regarding medical encounters for African-American patients. For many reasons, Hispanic/Latino citizens, non-citizens, and recent citizens are the largest single population of uninsured men, women, and children in the U.S.19 In addition, for members of many ethnic groups, language barriers and complex barriers associated with immigration status pose significant barriers to the take-up of nominally-provided public coverage, and create difficulties for obtaining appropriate medical services. A fourth aspect of vulnerability concerns individuals' ability to act as effective agents on their own behalf. Although one usually assumes that individuals are the best judges of their wellbeing, competent decisionmakers, and able to negotiate with and advocate for themselves or their children, this assumption comes into question for several populations of greatest policy concern.

Individuals with psychiatric disorders, cognitive impairment, or substance use disorders face important barriers to effective and informed decision-making. They are unlikely to be sophisticated consumers, and may be unaware of entitlements to health insurance coverage. Individuals experiencing social stigma and those with social and economic disadvantages are also likely to be less effective agents within the health care delivery system. Moreover, social stigma associated with welfare and other means-tested programs often impedes individuals from applying for the programs for which they are eligible.

Ill health, disease, and disability interact with many of these concerns to create especially significant vulnerability for individuals experiencing chronic illness. Chronic conditions limit access to insurance, and often limit individuals' ability to act on their own behalf. Adding to these burdens, chronic disease often creates additional needs for both formal and informal caregiving. The severely disabled must often rely on others for basic activities of daily living, creating another important vulnerability for policy.

These characteristics of vulnerability create dependence: a reliance on family and other caregivers, on medical providers and social service organizations, and on government programs for economic support. Some vulnerability is common. Many people face the risks of illness and may have insufficient financial resources to pay for needed services. Many individuals face potential discrimination. Children rely on their parents as proxy decision-makers, and every person faces the risk of at least temporary loss of cognitive faculties, as well as the long-term risk of developing cognitive and physical disabilities.

Along each dimension, if the limitations are severe enough, we can classify a person as being a member of a particular "vulnerable" population. Although many people face a single challenge due to chronic illness, low-income, or other challenges, the vulnerable populations frequently face multiple challenges, often in different domains of personal well-being or social functioning. These vulnerabilities affect how patients obtain medical care services and purchase health insurance, as well as the ways that the supply of services responds to these consumer demands.

 Program responses to needs and vulnerability

Under appropriate competitive conditions, insurance markets provide for efficient resource allocation. They do not, however, provide a vehicle to address distributional concerns that are central public policy goals. Some market failures arise because markets are missing. As Richard Zeckhauser has noted, many of life’s most important lotteries are run before one is born. One cannot buy insurance against the possibility that one will be born mentally retarded, Competitive markets do not normally provide cross-subsidies across different risk classes of health insurance consumers. An uncoordinated market will not, therefore, protect

chronically-ill consumers from the burden of actuarially-fair premiums. Competitive markets also fail to address important traditional externalities such as infectious disease transmission or the social costs that attend substance dependence and abuse.

These familiar market failures create a need for public action, and there is a history of such responses: the needs of vulnerable populations have long been the focus of public and private interventions. Public programs include the creation of hospitals for the mentally ill, programs to provide medical and preventive services, as well as income transfer and social insurance programs. Alongside these public responses to vulnerability is a rich history of involvement by voluntary and non-profit organizations. Non-profit Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans were central to the 20th century development of health insurance. Partly for historical reasons, and partly as a result of deliberate public policy, many safety-net providers that serve vulnerable populations operate under non-profit and public ownership.

 In many different ways, the history of health insurance and related programs shows that the problems of vulnerable populations have drawn forth many kinds of programs, institutions, and interventions.

The main federal and federal-state programs that currently provide health insurance are Medicare, Medicaid, and the State Children's Health Insurance Programs. More than 80 percent of Medicare recipients are over the age of 65. However, five million Medicare beneficiaries are of working age, making Medicare a prominent source of coverage across the adult population.

More than 90 percent of under-65 Medicare beneficiaries are eligible by virtue of disability. A smaller number are Medicare eligible through the end-stage renal disease program or are eligible as widows or widowers of Medicare beneficiaries.21

Medicaid serves a more varied range of recipient groups, including families receiving cash welfare benefits, people with disabilities who receive federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and children in low-income families. Medicaid also serves certain persons with high medical expenses, some of whom live in the community, and many others who are residents of nursing homes.

Important expansions of means-tested insurance programs occurred during the 1980s and 1990s, which were largely directed towards children. The most important of these requirements were mandates enacted as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Acts (OBRA) of 1989 and

1990, which required that the states extend Medicaid eligibility to all children under the age of six with family income below 133 percent of the poverty line, as well as children born after September 30, 1983, with family income below 100 percent of the poverty line.

The 1997 Balanced Budget Act supplemented these Medicaid expansions with the creation of grants to the states to fund State Children's Health Insurance Programs (SCHIP).

These programs are targeted at those families with children whose incomes are just above the Medicaid income thresholds of 100 or 133 percent of poverty. States are granted flexibility in implementing these programs, and can choose not only the upper income limits (typically around 300 percent of poverty), the nature of premiums and cost sharing requirements, and the administrative form of these new programs. Finally, an important related program is welfare. In 1996, Congress enacted and Bill Clinton signed the welfare reform law that repealed Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), replacing it with Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) block grants to the states. While there had been proposals to include Medicaid as part of these welfare block grants, this alternative was rejected. Instead, the legislation preserved Medicaid as a federal-state entitlement and explicitly maintained for the Medicaid program both the pre-welfare reform, AFDC-related eligibility rules for adults in families with dependent children, as well as the implementation schedule for the child-related expansions established in 1989-90.

These government programs are an important part of the current approach for providing health insurance for the vulnerable. Potential recipients face decisions regarding whether to enrol in programs. Recipients’ behavior while enrolled affects their further eligibility for insurance coverage. Welfare reform also changed the complex policy and administrative relationships across programs. Even before welfare reform, public insurance programs reflected significant institutional complexity inherited from the history of policy enactments. The range of

American social welfare programs includes health insurance programs that may overlap with each other, as well as various cash assistance, social policy, employment and training, etc. programs that may serve, separately, the needs of vulnerable groups. Because eligibility for one program might be conditioned on eligibility for another, or non-eligibility for a related program, the programs can serve as enrolment vehicles for each other. For example, cash assistance has

traditionally been the main outreach vehicle to enrol low-income women and children into Medicaid programs.

A second complexity emerges from the overlapping medical and social needs of vulnerable populations. Many private or public interventions address one need of vulnerable individuals. This existing patchwork of organizations and programs form the environment in which health insurance policy occurs. This patchwork arose due to historical accident, the dynamics of competing funding streams, the unique political, social, and health circumstances facing particular populations.

Governmental programs are created and administered through political decision-making. The political economy of this process is therefore important to the provision of health coverage.

 

Who are “the vulnerable?"

With this framework in place, we can more narrowly identify particular groups that areexemplars of these problems of vulnerability. These vulnerable populations include:

·        __ people with low incomes

·        __ children

·        __ racial/ethnic minorities, and immigrants

·        __ individuals with chronic disease

·        __ individuals with psychiatric or substance abuse disorders

Each group has a characteristic combination of the vulnerabilities discussed above. For those with low incomes, the primary vulnerability is economic disadvantage, in which job insecurity and low income hinder market health insurance coverage for low-income workers.

While children typically obtain insurance through parental employment, these policies do not necessarily cover them. Children are also dependent on parents and guardians to serve as proxy decisionmakers. Of course, low-income children share the additional difficulties faced by those with low incomes. For racial and ethnic minorities, the issues include general economic disadvantage, discrimination, language competence, and immigration status and program eligibility.

Those with chronic disease face the general difficulties of obtaining insurance because they are less likely to be employed, and the special difficulties that come with the combination of poor health and low income. The near elderly are experiencing the age-related rising incidence of acute and chronic illness at the same time that the employment connection for insurance.

 

Poverty

Опис : Scrapbook_Vice_%26_Poverty_poor_children_s Poverty (also called penury) is deprivation of common necessities that determine the quality of life, including food, clothing, shelter and safe drinking water, and may also include the deprivation of opportunities to learn, to obtain better employment to escape poverty, and/or to enjoy the respect of fellow citizens. According to Mollie Orshansky who developed the poverty measurements used by the U.S. government, "to be poor is to be deprived of those goods and services and pleasures which others around us take for granted. Ongoing debates over causes, effects and best ways to measure poverty, directly influence the design and implementation of poverty-reduction programs and are therefore relevant to the fields of international development and public administration.

Although poverty is generally considered to be undesirable due to the pain and suffering it may cause, in certain spiritual contexts "voluntary poverty," involving the renunciation of material goods is seen by some as virtuous.

Poverty may affect individuals or groups, and is not confined to the developing nations. Poverty in developed countries is manifest in a set of social problems including homelessness and the persistence of "ghetto" housing clusters.

Measuring poverty

Опис : Poverty_percent_world_map Poverty can be measured in terms of absolute or relative poverty. Absolute poverty refers to a set standard which is consistent over time and between countries. An example of an absolute measurement would be the percentage of the population eating less food than is required to sustain the human body (approximately 2000-2500 calories per day for an adult male).

Causes of poverty

Many different factors have been cited to explain why poverty occurs. However, no single explanation has gained universal acceptance.

Environmental Factors

Опис : http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:J_XWkhCVvbFdQM:http://www.ehponline.org/docs/1998/106-6/niehsnewsbody.GIF

  • Erosion. Intensive farming often leads to a vicious cycle of exhaustion of soil fertility and decline of agricultural yields and hence, increased poverty[
  • Desertification and overgrazingApproximately 40% of the world's agricultural land is seriously degraded. In Africa, if current trends of soil degradation continue, the continent might be able to feed just 25% of its population by 2025, according to UNU's Ghana-based Institute for Natural Resources in Africa
  • Deforestation as exemplified by the widespread rural poverty in China that began in the early 20th century and is attributed to non-sustainable tree harvesting.
  • Natural factors such as climate change. or environment
  • Geographic factors, for example access to fertile land, fresh water, minerals, energy, and other natural resources. Presence or absence of natural features helping or limiting communication, such as mountains, deserts, navigable rivers, or coastline. Historically, geography has prevented or slowed the spread of new technology to areas such as the Americas and Sub-Saharan Africa. The climate also limits what crops and farm animals may be used on similarly fertile lands.
  • On the other hand, research on the resource curse has found that countries with an abundance of natural resources creating quick wealth from exports tend to have less long-term prosperity than countries with less of these natural resources.
  • Drought and water crisis.

Economics

Опис : http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:-FL_VUS-GulYUM:http://superferryeconomics.com/photos/economics.jpg

  • Unemployment. Some countries' governments are believed to purposefully maintain a 2-10% unemployed populace to act as a 'replacement threat' to unskilled private sector workers, by way of maintaining an existing thriving service economy.
  • As of late 2007, increased farming for use in biofuels,along with world oil prices at nearly $130 a barrel has pushed up the price of grain. Food riots have recently taken place in many countries across the world.
  • Capital flight by which the wealthy in a society shift their assets to off-shore tax havens deprives nations of revenue needed to break the vicious cycle of poverty.
  • Weakly entrenched formal systems of title to private property are seen by writers such as Hernando de Soto as a limit to economic growth and therefore a cause of poverty. Communists see the institution of property rights itself as a cause of poverty.
  • Unfair terms of trade, in particular, the very high subsidies to and protective tariffs for agriculture in the developed world. This drains the taxed money and increases the prices for the consumers in developed world; decreases competition and efficiency; prevents exports by more competitive agricultural and other sectors in the developed world due to retaliatory trade barriers; and undermines the very type of industry in which the developing countries do have comparative advantages. Tax havens which tax their own citizens and companies but not those from other nations and refuse to disclose information necessary for foreign taxation. This enables large scale political corruption, tax evasion, and organized crime in the foreign nations.
  • Unequal distribution of land. Land reform is one solution.

Health Care

Hardwood surgical tables are commonplace in rural Nigerian clinics.

  • Poor access to affordable health care makes individuals less resilient to economic hardship and more vulnerable to poverty.
  • Inadequate nutrition in childhood, itself an effect of poverty, undermines the ability of individuals to develop their full human capabilities and thus makes them more vulnerable to poverty. Lack of essential minerals such as iodine and iron can impair brain development. It is estimated that 2 billion people (one-third of the total global population) are affected by iodine deficiency, including 285 million 6- to 12-year-old children. In developing countries, it is estimated that 40% of children aged 4 and under suffer from anemia because of insufficient iron in their diets. See also Health and intelligence.
  • Disease, specifically diseases of poverty: AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis and others overwhelmingly afflict developing nations, which perpetuate poverty by diverting individual, community, and national health and economic resources from investment and productivity. Further, many tropical nations are affected by parasites like malaria, schistosomiasis, and trypanosomiasis that are not present in temperate climates. The Tsetse fly makes it very difficult to use many animals in agriculture in afflicted regions.
  • Clinical depression undermines the resilience of individuals and when not properly treated makes them vulnerable to poverty.
  • Similarly substance abuse, including for example alcoholism and drug abuse when not properly treated undermines resilience and can consign people to vicious poverty cycles

Demographics and Social Factors

, racial discrimination, caste discrimination.

  • Individual beliefs, actions and choices.

Effects of poverty

The effects of poverty may also be causes, as listed above, thus creating a "poverty cycle" operating across multiple levels, individual, local, national and global.

Those living in poverty and lacking access to essential health services, suffering hunger or even starvation,experience mental and physical health problems which make it harder for them to improve their situation. One third of deaths - some 18 million people a year or 50,000 per day - are due to poverty-related causes: in total 270 million people, most of them women and children, have died as a result of poverty since 1990. Those living in poverty suffer lower life expectancy. Every year nearly 11 million children living in poverty die before their fifth birthday. Those living in poverty often suffer from hunger 800 million people go to bed hungry every night.Poverty increases the risk of homelessness There are over 100 million street children worldwide. Increased risk of drug abuse may also be associated with poverty.

Diseases of poverty reflect the dynamic relationship between poverty and poor health; while such infectious diseases result directly from poverty, they also perpetuate and deepen impoverishment by sapping personal and national health and financial resources. For example, malaria decreases GDP growth by up to 1.3% in some developing nations, and by killing tens of millions in sub-Saharan Africa, AIDS alone threatens “the economies, social structures, and political stability of entire societies”.

Those living in poverty in the developed world may suffer social isolation. Rates of suicide may increase in conditions of poverty. Death of a breadwinner may decrease a household's resilience to poverty conditions and cause a dramatic worsening in their situation. Low income levels and poor employment opportunities for adults in turn create the conditions where households can depend on the income of child members. An estimated 218 million children aged 5 to 17 are in child labor worldwide, excluding child domestic labor Lacking viable employment opportunities those living in poverty may also engage in the informal economy, or in criminal activity, both of which may on a larger scale discourage investment in the economy, further perpetuating conditions of poverty.

Low income and wealth levels undermine the ability of governments to levy taxes for public service provision, adding to the 'vicious circle' connecting the causes and effects of poverty. Lack of essential infrastructure, poor education and health services, and poor sanitation contribute to the perpetuation of poverty. Poor access to affordable public education can lead to low levels of literacy, further entrenching poverty. Weak public service provision and high levels of poverty can increase states' vulnerability to natural disasters and make states more vulnerable to shocks in the international economy, such as those associated with rising fuel prices, or declining commodity prices. Areas strongly affected by poverty tend to be more violent. In one survey, 67% of children from disadvantaged inner cities said they had witnessed a serious assault, and 33% reported witnessing a homicide. 51% of fifth graders from New Orleans (median income for a household: $27,133) have been found to be victims of violence, compared to 32% in Washington, DC (mean income for a household: $40,127).

The capacity of the state is further undermined by the problem that people living in poverty may be more vulnerable to extremist political persuasion, and may feel less loyalty to a state unable to deliver basic services. For these reasons conditions of poverty may increase the risk of political violence, terrorism, war and genocide, and may make those living in poverty vulnerable to human trafficking, internal displacement and exile as refugees. Countries suffering widespread poverty may experience loss of population, particularly in high-skilled professions, through emigration, which may further undermine their ability to improve their situation.

Homelessness

Опис : 210K-116-010 Homelessness is the condition and social category of people who lack housing, because they cannot afford, or are otherwise unable to maintain, regular, safe, and adequate shelter. The term "homelessness" may also include people whose primary nighttime residence is in a homeless shelter, in an institution that provides a temporary residence for individuals intended to be institutionalized, or in a public or private place not designed for use as a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings. A small number of people choose to be homeless nomads, such as some Romani people (Gypsies) and members of some subcultures. An estimated 100 million people worldwide are homeless.

The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defines a "chronically homeless" person as "an unaccompanied homeless individual with a disabling condition who has either been continuously homeless for a year or more, or has had at least four episodes of homelessness in the past three years.

The term "homelessness" includes the people whose primary nighttime residence is in an institution that provides a residence for individuals intended to be institutionalized, or in a public or private place not designed for use as a regular sleeping conditions for human beings.

The term used to describe homeless people in academic articles and government reports is "homeless people". Popular slang terms, some of which are considered derogatory, include: vagrant, tramp, hobo (U.S.), transient, bum (U.S.), bagman/bagwoman, urban outdoorsmen, or the wandering poor. The term '(of) No Fixed Abode' (NFA) is used in legal circumstances. Sometimes the term “houseless” is used to reflect a more accurate condition in some cases. In different languages, the term for homelessness reveals the cultural and societal perception and classification of a homeless person:

Main causes of homelessness

Опис : homelessness5 The major reasons and lack of causes for homelessness as documented by many reports and studies include.

  • Lack of affordable housing
  • Unavailability of employment opportunities, which becomes a vicious circle due to the initial problem of being homeless
  • Poverty, caused by many factors including unemployment and underemployment
  • Lack of affordable healthcare
  • Substance abuse and unavailability or lack of needed services
  • Mental illness and unavailability or lack of needed services
  • Domestic violence
  • Prison release and re-entry into society
  • Natural disaster
  • Forced eviction - In many countries, people lose their homes by government order to make way for newer upscale high rise buildings, roadways, and other governmental needs.] The compensation may be minimal, in which case the former occupants cannot find appropriate new housing and become homeless.
  • Mortgage foreclosures on homes in the United States in due to the crisis of a large number of shaky and sub-prime mortgages granted by banks and other lenders.

Опис : homeless1350A substantial percentage of the U.S. homeless population are individuals who are chronically unemployed or have difficulty managing their lives effectively due to prolonged and severe drug and/or alcohol abuse. Substance abuse can cause homelessness from behavioral patterns associated with addiction that alienate an addicted individual's family and friends who could otherwise provide support during difficult economic times.

Increased wealth disparity and income inequality causes distortions in the housing market that push rent burdens higher, making housing unaffordable.Problems faced by homeless people

Homeless people face many problems beyond the lack of a safe and suitable home. They are often faced with many social disadvantages and reduced access to private and public services such as:

  • Reduced access to health care
  • Limited access to education
  • Increased risk of suffering from violence and abuse
  • Discrimination
  • Not being seen as suitable for employment

 

Health care for the homeless

Health care for the homeless is a major public health challenge.

Опис : nurse Homeless people are more likely to suffer injuries and medical problems from their lifestyle on the street, which includes poor nutrition, substance abuse, exposure to the severe elements of weather, and a higher exposure to violence (robberies, beatings, and so on). Yet at the same time, they have little access to public medical services or clinics. This is a particular problem in the US where many people lack health insurance: "Each year, millions of people in the United States experience homelessness and are in desperate need of health care services. Most do not have health insurance of any sort, and none have cash to pay for medical care."

Homeless persons often find it difficult to document their date of birth or their address. Because homeless people usually have no place to store possessions, they often lose their belongings, including their identification and other documents, or find them destroyed by police or others. Without a photo ID, homeless persons cannot get a job or access many social services. They can be denied access to even the most basic assistance: clothing closets, food pantries, certain public benefits, and in some cases, emergency shelters.

Obtaining replacement identification is difficult. Without an address, birth certificates cannot be mailed. Fees may be cost-prohibitive for impoverished persons. And some states will not issue birth certificates unless the person has photo identification, creating a Catch-22. This problem is far less acute in countries which provide free-at-use health care, such as the UK, where hospitals are open-access day and night, and make no charges for treatment. In the US, free-care clinics, especially for the homeless do exist in major cities, but they are usually over-burdened with patients.

 The conditions affecting the homeless are somewhat specialized and have opened a new area of medicine tailored to this population. Skin conditions and diseases abound, because homeless people are exposed to extreme cold in the winter and they have little access to bathing facilities. Homeless people also have more severe dental problems than the general population. Specialized medical textbooks have been written to address this for providers.

Опис : patches_nurses_badge There are many organizations providing free care to the homeless in countries which do not offer free medical treatment organised by the state, but the services are in great demand given the limited number of medical practitioners. For example, it might take months to get a minimal dental appointment in a free-care clinic. Communicable diseases are of great concern, especially tuberculosis, which spreads more easily in crowded homeless shelters in high density urban settings

In 1999, Dr. Susan Barrow of the Columbia University Center for Homelessness Prevention Studies reported in a study that the "age-adjusted death rates of homeless men and women were 4 times those of the general US population and 2 to 3 times those of the general population of New York City".