EMERGENCY STATION. ORGANIZATION OF WORK, FUNCTIONS, STRUCTURE. THE URGENT HELP AT ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION ON PRECLINICAL STAGE. THE URGENT HELP AT ACUTE HEART FAILURE ON PREHOSPITAL STAGE (BY EMERGENCY & FAMILY DOCTORS)

Diagram of a myocardial infarction (2) of the tip of the anterior wall of the heart (an apical infarct) after occlusion (1) of a branch of the left coronary artery (LCA, right coronary artery = RCA).

A heart attack, known in medicine as an (acute) myocardial infarction (AMI or MI), occurs when the blood supply to part of the heart is interrupted. This is most commonly due to occlusion (blockage) of a coronary artery following the rupture of a vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque, which is an unstable collection of lipids (like cholesterol) and white blood cells (especially macrophages) in the wall of an artery. The resulting ischemia (restriction in blood supply) and oxygen shortage, if left untreated for a sufficient period, can cause damage and/or death (infarction) of heart muscle tissue (myocardium).

Classical symptoms of acute myocardial infarction include sudden chest pain (typically radiating to the left arm or left side of the neck), shortness of breath, nausea, vomiting, palpitations, sweating, and anxiety (often described as a sense of impending doom). Women may experience fewer typical symptoms than men, most commonly shortness of breath, weakness, a feeling of indigestion, and fatigue. Approximately one quarter of all myocardial infarctions are silent, without chest pain or other symptoms. A heart attack is a medical emergency, and people experiencing chest pain are advised to alert their emergency medical services, because prompt treatment is beneficial.

Heart attacks are the leading cause of death for both men and women all over the world. Important risk factors are previous cardiovascular disease (such as angina, a previous heart attack or stroke), older age (especially men over 40 and women over 50), tobacco smoking, high blood levels of certain lipids (triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein or "bad cholesterol") and low high density lipoprotein (HDL, "good cholesterol"), diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, excessive alcohol consumption, the abuse of certain drugs (such as cocaine), and chronic high stress levels.

Immediate treatment for suspected acute myocardial infarction includes oxygen, aspirin, and sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (colloquially referred to as nitroglycerin and abbreviated as NTG or GTN). Pain relief is also often given, classically morphine sulfate.

The patient will receive a number of diagnostic tests, such as an electrocardiogram (ECG, EKG), a chest X-ray and blood tests to detect elevations in cardiac markers (blood tests to detect heart muscle damage). The most often used markers are the creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) fraction and the troponin I (TnI) or troponin T (TnT) levels. On the basis of the ECG, a distinction is made between ST elevation MI (STEMI) or non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI). Most cases of STEMI are treated with thrombolysis or if possible with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, angioplasty and stent insertion), provided the hospital has facilities for coronary angiography. NSTEMI is managed with medication, although PCI is often performed during hospital admission. In patients who have multiple blockages and who are relatively stable, or in a few extraordinary emergency cases, bypass surgery of the blocked coronary artery is an option.

The phrase "heart attack" is sometimes used incorrectly to describe sudden cardiac death, which may or may not be the result of acute myocardial infarction. A heart attack is different from, but can be the cause of cardiac arrest, which is the stopping of the heartbeat, and cardiac arrhythmia, an abnormal heartbeat. It is also distinct from heart failure, in which the pumping action of the heart is impaired; severe myocardial infarction may lead to heart failure, but not necessarily.

Classification

Classification of acute coronary syndromes.

Classification of acute coronary syndromes.

 Acute myocardial infarction is a type of acute coronary syndrome, which is most frequently (but not always) a manifestation of coronary artery disease. The acute coronary syndromes include ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina (UA).

By zone

Depending on the location of the obstruction in the coronary circulation, different zones of the heart can become injured. Using the anatomical terms of location corresponding to areas perfused by major coronary arteries, one can describe anterior, inferior, lateral, apical, septal, posterior, and right-ventricular infarctions (and combinations, such as anteroinferior, anterolateral, and so on).[42]

  • Infarcts of the lateral wall are caused by occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery(LCx) or its oblique marginal branches (or even large diagonal branches from the LAD.)

Signs and symptoms

The cardinal sign of decreased blood flow to the heart is chest pain experienced as tightness around the chest and radiating to the left arm and the left angle of the jaw. This may be associated with diaphoresis (sweating), nausea and vomiting, as well as shortness of breath. In many cases, the sensation is "atypical", with pain experienced in different ways or even being completely absent (which is more likely in female patients and those with diabetes). Some may report palpitations, anxiety or a sense of impending doom and a feeling of being acutely ill.

 Diagnosis

Classification of acute coronary syndromes

A myocardial infarction occurs when an atherosclerotic plaque slowly builds up in the inner lining of a coronary artery and then suddenly ruptures, totally occluding the artery and preventing blood flow downstream.

A myocardial infarction occurs when an atherosclerotic plaque slowly builds up in the inner lining of a coronary artery and then suddenly ruptures, totally occluding the artery and preventing blood flow downstream.

Electrocardiogram

In the setting of acute chest pain, the electrocardiogram is the investigation that most reliably distinguishes between various causes. If this indicates acute heart damage (elevation in the ST segment, new left bundle branch block), treatment for a heart attack in the form of angioplasty or thrombolysis is indicated immediately (see below). In the absence of such changes, it is not possible to immediately distinguish between unstable angina and NSTEMI.

Imaging and blood tests

As it is only one of the many potential causes of chest pain, the patient usually has a number of tests in the emergency department, such as a chest X-ray, blood tests (including myocardial markers such as troponin I or T, and a D-dimer if a pulmonary embolism is suspected), and telemetry (monitoring of the heart rhythm).

Prediction scores

The ACI-TIPI score can be used to aid diagnosis; using 7 variables from the admission record, this score predicts crudely which patients are likely to have myocardial ischemia. The TIMI risk score can identify high risk patients and has been independently validated.

Biomarkers for diagnosis

The aim of diagnostic markers is to identify patients with ACS even when there is no evidence of myocyte necrosis.

  • Ischemia-Modified Albumin (IMA) - In cases of Ischemia - Albumin undergoes a conformational change and loses its ability to bind transitional metals (copper or cobalt). IMA can be used to assess the proportion of modified albumin in ischemia. Its use is limited to ruling out ischemia rather than a diagnostic test for the occurrence of ischemia.
  • Myeloperoxidase (MPO) - The levels of circulating MPO, a leukocyte enzyme, elevate early after ACS and can be used as an early marker for the condition.
  • Glycogen Phosphorylase Isoenzyme BB-(GPBB) is an early marker of cardiac ischemia and is one of three isoenzyme of Glycogen Phosphorylase.
  • Troponin is a late cardiac marker of ACS

 STEMI

If the ECG confirms changes suggestive of myocardial infarction (ST elevations in specific leads, a new left bundle branch block or a true posterior MI pattern), thrombolytics may be administered or primary coronary angioplasty may be performed. In the former, medication is injected that stimulates fibrinolysis, destroying blood clots obstructing the coronary arteries. In the latter, a flexible catheter is passed via the femoral or radial arteries and advanced to the heart to identify blockages in the coronaries. When occlusions are found, they can be intervened upon mechanically with angioplasty and perhaps stent deployment if a lesion, termed the culprit lesion, is thought to be causing myocardial damage.

NSTEMI and NSTE-ACS

If the ECG does not show typical changes, the term "non-ST segment elevation ACS" is applied. The patient may still have suffered a "non-ST elevation MI" (NSTEMI). The accepted management of unstable angina and acute coronary syndrome is therefore empirical treatment with aspirin, heparin (usually a low-molecular weight heparin such as enoxaparin) and clopidogrel, with intravenous glyceryl trinitrate and opioids if the pain persists.

A blood test is generally performed for cardiac troponins twelve hours after onset of the pain. If this is positive, coronary angiography is typically performed on an urgent basis, as this is highly predictive of a heart attack in the near-future. If the troponin is negative, a treadmill exercise test or a thallium scintigram may be requested.

Prevention

Acute coronary syndrome often reflects a degree of damage to the coronaries by atherosclerosis. Primary prevention of atherosclerosis is controlling the risk factors: healthy eating, exercise, treatment for hypertension and diabetes, avoiding smoking and controlling cholesterol levels); in patients with significant risk factors, aspirin has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. Secondary prevention is discussed in myocardial infarction.

After a ban on smoking in all enclosed public places was introduced in Scotland in March 2006, there was a 17 percent reduction in hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome. 67% of the decrease occurred in non-smokers.

Angina pectoris, commonly known as angina, is severe chest pain due to ischemia (a lack of blood and hence oxygen supply) of the heart muscle, generally due to obstruction or spasm of the coronary arteries (the heart's blood vessels). Coronary artery disease, the main cause of angina, is due to atherosclerosis of the cardiac arteries. The term derives from the Greek ankhon ("strangling") and the Latin pectus ("chest"), and can therefore be translated as "a strangling feeling in the chest".

It is not common to equate severity of angina with risk of fatal cardiac events. There is a weak relationship between severity of pain and degree of oxygen deprivation in the heart muscle (i.e. there can be severe pain with little or no risk of a heart attack, and a heart attack can occur without pain).

Worsening ("crescendo") angina attacks, sudden-onset angina at rest, and angina lasting more than 15 minutes are symptoms of unstable angina (usually grouped with similar conditions as the acute coronary syndrome). As these may herald myocardial infarction (a heart attack), they require urgent medical attention and are generally treated as a presumed heart attack.

 Symptoms

Most patients with angina complain of chest discomfort rather than actual pain: the discomfort is usually described as a pressure, heaviness, tightness, squeezing, burning, or choking sensation. Apart from chest discomfort, anginal pains may also be experienced in the epigastrium (upper central abdomen), back, neck, jaw, or shoulders. Typical locations for radiation of pain are arms (often inner left arm), shoulders, and neck into the jaw. Angina is typically precipitated by exertion or emotional stress. It is exacerbated by having a full stomach and by cold temperatures. Pain may be accompanied by breathlessness, sweating and nausea in some cases. It usually lasts for about 1 to 5 minutes, and is relieved by rest or specific anti-angina medication. Chest pain lasting only a few seconds is normally not angina.

Myocardial ischemia comes about when the myocardia (the heart muscles) receive insufficient blood and oxygen to function normally either because of increased oxygen demand by the myocardia or by decreased supply to the myocardia. This inadequate perfusion of blood and the resulting reduced delivery of oxygen and nutrients, is directly correlated to blocked or narrowed blood vessels.

Some experience "autonomic symptoms" (related to increased activity of the autonomic nervous system) such as nausea, vomiting and pallor.

Major risk factors for angina include cigarette smoking, diabetes, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, sedentary lifestyle and family history of premature heart disease.

A variant form of angina (Prinzmetal's angina) occurs in patients with normal coronary arteries or insignificant atherosclerosis. It is thought to be caused by spasms of the artery. It occurs more in younger women.

 Subtypes

Stable angina

This refers to the more common understanding of angina related to myocardial ischemia. Typical presentations of stable angina is that of chest discomfort and associated symptoms precipitated by some activity (running, walking, etc) with minimal or non-existent symptoms at rest. Symptoms typically abate several minutes following cessation of precipitating activities and resume when activity resumes. In this way, stable angina may be thought of as being similar to claudication symptoms.

Unstable angina

Unstable angina (UA)is defined as angina pectoris or equivalent ischemic discomfort with at least one of three features: (1) it occurs at rest (or with minimal exertion), usually lasting >10 min; (2) it is severe and of new onset (i.e., within the prior 4–6 weeks); and/or (3) it occurs with a crescendo pattern (i.e., distinctly more severe, prolonged, or frequent than previously).UA may occur unpredictably at rest which may be a serious indicator of an impending heart attack. What differentiates stable angina from unstable angina (other than symptoms) is the pathophysiology of the atherosclerosis. In stable angina, the developing atheroma is protected with a fibrous cap. This cap (atherosclerotic plaque) may rupture in unstable angina, allowing blood clots to precipitate and further decrease the lumen of the coronary vessel. This explains why angina appears to be independent to activity.

Diagnosis

In angina patients who are momentarily not feeling any chest pain, an electrocardiogram (ECG) is typically normal, unless there have been other cardiac problems in the past. During periods of pain, depression or elevation of the ST segment may be observed. To elicit these changes, an exercise ECG test ("treadmill test") may be performed, during which the patient exercises to their maximum ability before fatigue, breathlessness or, importantly, pain supervenes; if characteristic ECG changes are documented (typically more than 1 mm of flat or downsloping ST depression), the test is considered diagnostic for angina. The exercise test is also useful in looking for other markers of myocardial ischaemia: blood pressure response (or lack thereof, particularly a drop in systolic pressure), dysrhythmia and chronotropic response. Other alternatives to a standard exercise test include a thallium scintigram (in patients that cannot exercise enough for the purposes of the treadmill tests, e.g., due to asthma or arthritis or in whom the ECG is too abnormal at rest) or Stress Echocardiography.

In patients in whom such noninvasive testing is diagnostic, a coronary angiogram is typically performed to identify the nature of the coronary lesion, and whether this would be a candidate for angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), treatment only with medication, or other treatments. In patients who are in hospital with unstable angina (or the newer term of "high risk acute coronary syndromes"), those with resting ischaemic ECG changes or those with raised cardiac enzymes such as troponin may undergo coronary angiography directly.

Pathophysiology

Increase in heart rate results in increased oxygen demand by the heart. The heart has a limited ability to increase its oxygen intake during episodes of increased demand. Therefore, an increase in oxygen demand by the heart (eg, during exercise) has to be met by a proportional increase in blood flow to the heart.

Myocardial ischemia can result from:

1.     a reduction of blood flow to the heart that can be caused by stenosis, spasm, or acute occlusion (by an embolus) of the heart's arteries

2.     resistance of the blood vessels

3.     reduced oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood.

Atherosclerosis is the most common cause of stenosis (narrowing of the blood vessels) of the heart's arteries and, hence, angina pectoris. Some people with chest pain have normal or minimal narrowing of heart arteries; in these patients, vasospasm is a more likely cause for the pain, sometimes in the context of Prinzmetal's angina and syndrome X.

Myocardial ischemia also can be the result of factors affecting blood composition, such as reduced oxygen-carrying capacity of blood, as seen with seven anemia (low number of red blood cells), or long-term smoking.

Epidemiology

Roughly 6.3 million Americans are estimated to experience angina. Angina is more often the presenting symptom of coronary artery disease in women than in men. The prevalence of angina rises with an increase in age. Similar figures apply in the remainder of the Western world. All forms of coronary heart disease are much less-common in the Third World, as its risk factors are much more common in Western and Westernized countries; it could therefore be termed a disease of affluence. The increase of smoking, obesity and other risk factors has already led to an increase in angina and related diseases in countries such as China.

Treatment

The main goals of treatment in angina pectoris are relief of symptoms, slowing progression of the disease, and reduction of future events, especially heart attacks and of course death. An aspirin (75 mg to 100 mg) per day has been shown to be beneficial for all patients with stable angina that have no problems with its use. Beta blockers (eg. carvedilol, propranolol, atenolol etc. are some few examples) have a large body of evidence in morbidity and mortality benefits (fewer symptoms and disability and live longer) and short-acting nitroglycerin medications are used for symptomatic relief of angina. Calcium channel blockers (such as nifedipine (Adalat) and amlodipine), Isosorbide mononitrate and nicorandil are vasodilators commonly used in chronic stable angina. A new therapeutic class, called If inhibitor, has recently been made available: ivabradine provides pure heart rate reduction,.[1] leading to major anti-ischemic and antianginal efficacy. ACE inhibitors are also vasodilators with both symptomatic and prognostic benefit and lastly, statins are the most frequently used lipid/cholesterol modifiers which probably also stabilise existing atheromatous plaque.

Surprising perhaps is that exercise is also a very good long term treatment for angina (but only particular regimes - gentle and sustained exercise rather than dangerous intense short bursts),[2] probably working by complex mechanisms such improving blood pressure and promoting coronary artery collateralisation.

Identifying and treating risk factors for further coronary heart disease is a priority in patients with angina. This means testing for elevated cholesterol and other fats in the blood, diabetes and hypertension (high blood pressure), encouraging stopping smoking and weight optimisation.

Ranolazine (Ranexa) is a new class of anti anginal drug that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Recently, University of Cincinnati medical researchers in cardiology have tried to use a non-invasive, non-surgical collecting tool to gather harvested erythropoietic bone marrow-based adult stem cells and coax them into regrowing new coronary blood vessels to supply the cardiac muscle's cells (cardiac myocytes) with oxygenated blood, with some success- leading to larger Phase 2 trials.

The largest randomised trial of an anti-anginal drug to date is the ACTION trial. It included 7,665 patients with stable angina pectoris. ACTION demonstrated that the calcium channel blocker nifedipine (Adalat) prolongs cardiovascular event- and procedure-free survival in patients with coronary artery disease. For example new overt heart failures were reduced by 29% compared to placebo. This finding confirms the vascular-protective effects of nifedipine.

Symptoms

Rough diagram of pain zones in myocardial infarction (dark red = most typical area, light red = other possible areas, view of the chest).

Rough diagram of pain zones in myocardial infarction (dark red = most typical area, light red = other possible areas, view of the chest).

Back view.

Back view.

The onset of symptoms in myocardial infarction (MI) is usually gradual, over several minutes, and rarely instantaneous. Chest pain is the most common symptom of acute myocardial infarction and is often described as a sensation of tightness, pressure, or squeezing. Chest pain due to ischemia (a lack of blood and hence oxygen supply) of the heart muscle is termed angina pectoris. Pain radiates most often to the left arm, but may also radiate to the lower jaw, neck, right arm, back, and epigastrium, where it may mimic heartburn. Levine's sign, in which the patient localizes the chest pain by clenching their fist over the sternum, has classically been thought to be predictive of cardiac chest pain, although a prospective observational study showed that it had a poor positive predictive value.

Shortness of breath (dyspnea) occurs when the damage to the heart limits the output of the left ventricle, causing left ventricular failure and consequent pulmonary edema. Other symptoms include diaphoresis (an excessive form of sweating), weakness, light-headedness, nausea, vomiting, and palpitations. These symptoms are likely induced by a massive surge of catecholamines from the sympathetic nervous system which occurs in response to pain and the hemodynamic abnormalities that result from cardiac dysfunction. Loss of consciousness (due to inadequate cerebral perfusion and cardiogenic shock) and even sudden death (frequently due to the development of ventricular fibrillation) can occur in myocardial infarctions.

Women and older patients experience atypical symptoms more frequently than their male and younger counterparts. Women also have more symptoms compared to men (2.6 on average vs 1.8 symptoms in men). The most common symptoms of MI in women include dyspnea, weakness, and fatigue. Fatigue, sleep disturbances, and dyspnea have been reported as frequently occurring symptoms which may manifest as long as one month before the actual clinically manifested ischemic event. In women, chest pain may be less predictive of coronary ischemia than in men.

Approximately half of all MI patients have experienced warning symptoms such as chest pain prior to the infarction.

Approximately one fourth of all myocardial infarctions are silent, without chest pain or other symptoms. These cases can be discovered later on electrocardiograms or at autopsy without a prior history of related complaints. A silent course is more common in the elderly, in patients with diabetes mellitus and after heart transplantation, probably because the donor heart is not connected to nerves of the host. In diabetics, differences in pain threshold, autonomic neuropathy, and psychological factors have been cited as possible explanations for the lack of symptoms.

Any group of symptoms compatible with a sudden interruption of the blood flow to the heart are called an acute coronary syndrome.

The differential diagnosis includes other catastrophic causes of chest pain, such as pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection, pericardial effusion causing cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax, and esophageal rupture.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of myocardial infarction is made by integrating the history of the presenting illness and physical examination with electrocardiogram findings and cardiac markers (blood tests for heart muscle cell damage). A coronary angiogram allows visualization of narrowings or obstructions on the heart vessels, and therapeutic measures can follow immediately. At autopsy, a pathologist can diagnose a myocardial infarction based on anatomopathological findings.

A chest radiograph and routine blood tests may indicate complications or precipitating causes and are often performed upon arrival to an emergency department. New regional wall motion abnormalities on an echocardiogram are also suggestive of a myocardial infarction. Echo may be performed in equivocal cases by the on-call cardiologist. In stable patients whose symptoms have resolved by the time of evaluation, technetium-99m 2-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (Tc99m MIBI) or thallium-201 chloride can be used in nuclear medicine to visualize areas of reduced blood flow in conjunction with physiologic or pharmocologic stress. Thallium may also be used to determine viability of tissue, distinguishing whether non-functional myocardium is actually dead or merely in a state of hibernation or of being stunned.

Diagnostic criteria

WHO criteria have classically been used to diagnose MI; a patient is diagnosed with myocardial infarction if two (probable) or three (definite) of the following criteria are satisfied:

1.     Clinical history of ischaemic type chest pain lasting for more than 20 minutes

2.     Changes in serial ECG tracings

3.     Rise and fall of serum cardiac biomarkers such as creatine kinase-MB fraction and troponin

The WHO criteria were refined in 2000 to give more prominence to cardiac biomarkers.[41] According to the new guidelines, a cardiac troponin rise accompanied by either typical symptoms, pathological Q waves, ST elevation or depression or coronary intervention are diagnostic of MI.

Physical examination

The general appearance of patients may vary according to the experienced symptoms; the patient may be comfortable, or restless and in severe distress with an increased respiratory rate. A cool and pale skin is common and points to vasoconstriction. Some patients have low-grade fever (38–39 °C). Blood pressure may be elevated or decreased, and the pulse can be become irregular.

If heart failure ensues, elevated jugular venous pressure and hepatojugular reflux, or swelling of the legs due to peripheral edema may be found on inspection. Rarely, a cardiac bulge with a pace different from the pulse rhythm can be felt on precordial examination. Various abnormalities can be found on auscultation, such as a third and fourth heart sound, systolic murmurs, paradoxical splitting of the second heart sound, a pericardial friction rub and rales over the lung.

12-lead electrocardiogram showing ST-segment elevation (orange) in I, aVL and V1-V5 with reciprocal changes (blue) in the inferior leads, indicative of an anterior wall myocardial infarction.

12-lead electrocardiogram showing ST-segment elevation (orange) in I, aVL and V1-V5 with reciprocal changes (blue) in the inferior leads, indicative of an anterior wall myocardial infarction.

12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) showing acute inferior ST segment elevation MI (STEMI). Note the ST segment elevation in leads II, III, and aVF along with reciprocal ST segment depression in leads I and aVL.

12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) showing acute inferior ST segment elevation MI (STEMI). Note the ST segment elevation in leads II, III, and aVF along with reciprocal ST segment depression in leads I and aVL.

Electrocardiogram

The primary purpose of the electrocardiogram is to detect ischemia or acute coronary injury in broad, symptomatic emergency department populations. However, the standard 12 lead ECG has several limitations. An ECG represents a brief sample in time. Because unstable ischemic syndromes have rapidly changing supply versus demand characteristics, a single ECG may not accurately represent the entire picture. It is therefore desirable to obtain serial 12 lead ECGs, particularly if the first ECG is obtained during a pain-free episode. Alternatively, many emergency departments and chest pain centers use computers capable of continuous ST segment monitoring. The standard 12 lead ECG also does not directly examine the right ventricle, and is relatively poor at examining the posterior basal and lateral walls of the left ventricle. In particular, acute myocardial infarction in the distribution of the circumflex artery is likely to produce a nondiagnostic ECG. The use of additional ECG leads like right-sided leads V3R and V4R and posterior leads V7, V8, and V9 may improve sensitivity for right ventricular and posterior myocardial infarction. In spite of these limitations, the 12 lead ECG stands at the center of risk stratification for the patient with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Mistakes in interpretation are relatively common, and the failure to identify high risk features has a negative effect on the quality of patient care.

The 12 lead ECG is used to classify patients into one of three groups:

1.     those with ST segment elevation or new bundle branch block (suspicious for acute injury and a possible candidate for acute reperfusion therapy with thrombolytics or primary PCI),

2.     those with ST segment depression or T wave inversion (suspicious for ischemia), and

3.     those with a so-called non-diagnostic or normal ECG.

A normal ECG does not rule out acute myocardial infarction. Sometimes the earliest presentation of acute myocardial infarction is the hyperacute T wave, which is treated the same as ST segment elevation. In practice this is rarely seen, because it only exists for 2-30 minutes after the onset of infarction. Hyperacute T waves need to be distinguished from the peaked T waves associated with hyperkalemia. The current guidelines for the ECG diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction require at least 1 mm (0.1 mV) of ST segment elevation in the limb leads, and at least 2 mm elevation in the precordial leads. These elevations must be present in anatomically contiguous leads. (I, aVL, V5, V6 correspond to the lateral wall; V1-V4 correspond to the anterior wall; II, III, aVF correspond to the inferior wall.) This criterion is problematic, however, as acute myocardial infarction is not the most common cause of ST segment elevation in chest pain patients. Over 90% of healthy men have at least 1 mm (0.1 mV) of ST segment elevation in at least one precordial lead. The clinician must therefore be well versed in recognizing the so-called ECG mimics of acute myocardial infarction, which include left ventricular hypertrophy, left bundle branch block, paced rhythm, early repolarization, pericarditis, hyperkalemia, and ventricular aneurysm.

Left bundle branch block and pacing interferes with the electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocadial infarction. The GUSTO investigators Sgarbossa et al. developed a set of criteria for identifying acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block and paced rhythm. They include concordant ST segment elevation > 1 mm (0.1 mV), discordant ST segment elevation > 5 mm (0.5 mV), and concordant ST segment depression in the left precordial leads. The presence of reciprocal changes on the 12 lead ECG may help distinguish true acute myocardial infarction from the mimics of acute myocardial infarction. The contour of the ST segment may also be helpful, with a straight or upwardly convex (non-concave) ST segment favoring the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

The constellation of leads with ST segment elevation enables the clinician to identify what area of the heart is injured, which in turn helps predict the so-called culprit artery.

Wall Affected

Leads Showing ST Segment Elevation

Leads Showing Reciprocal ST Segment Depression

Suspected Culprit Artery

Septal

V1, V2

None

Left Anterior Descending (LAD)

Anterior

V3, V4

None

Left Anterior Descending (LAD)

Anteroseptal

V1, V2, V3, V4

None

Left Anterior Descending (LAD)

Anterolateral

V3, V4, V5, V6, I, aVL

II, III, aVF

Left Anterior Descending (LAD), Circumflex (LCX), or Obtuse Marginal

Extensive anterior (Sometimes called Anteroseptal with Lateral extension)

V1,V2,V3, V4, V5, V6, I, aVL

II, III, aVF

Left main coronary artery (LCA)

Inferior

II, III, aVF

I, aVL

Right Coronary Artery (RCA) or Circumflex (LCX)

Lateral

I, aVL, V5, V6

II, III, aVF

Circumflex (LCX) or Obtuse Marginal

Posterior (Usually associated with Inferior or Lateral but can be isolated)

V7, V8, V9

V1,V2,V3, V4

Posterior Descending (PDA) (branch of the RCA or Circumflex (LCX))

Right ventricular (Usually associated with Inferior)

II, III, aVF, V1, V4R

I, aVL

Right Coronary Artery (RCA)

As the myocardial infarction evolves, there may be loss of R wave height and development of pathological Q waves (defined as Q waves deeper than 1 mm and wider than 1 mm.) T wave inversion may persist for months or even permanently following acute myocardial infarction.[80] Typically, however, the T wave recovers, leaving a pathological Q wave as the only remaining evidence that an acute myocardial infarction has occurred.

Cardiac markers

Cardiac markers or cardiac enzymes are proteins from cardiac tissue found in the blood. These proteins are released into the bloodstream when damage to the heart occurs, as in the case of a myocardial infarction. Until the 1980s, the enzymes SGOT and LDH were used to assess cardiac injury. Then it was found that disproportional elevation of the MB subtype of the enzyme creatine kinase (CK) was very specific for myocardial injury. Current guidelines are generally in favor of troponin sub-units I or T, which are very specific for the heart muscle and are thought to rise before permanent injury develops. Elevated troponins in the setting of chest pain may accurately predict a high likelihood of a myocardial infarction in the near future. New markers such as glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB are under investigation.

The diagnosis of myocardial infarction requires two out of three components (history, ECG, and enzymes). When damage to the heart occurs, levels of cardiac markers rise over time, which is why blood tests for them are taken over a 24-hour period. Because these enzyme levels are not elevated immediately following a heart attack, patients presenting with chest pain are generally treated with the assumption that a myocardial infarction has occurred and then evaluated for a more precise diagnosis.

Angiography

Angiogram of the coronary arteries.

Angiogram of the coronary arteries.

In difficult cases or in situations where intervention to restore blood flow is appropriate, coronary angiography can be performed. A catheter is inserted into an artery (usually the femoral artery) and pushed to the vessels supplying the heart. A radio-opaque dye is administered through the catheter and a sequence of x-rays (fluoroscopy) is performed. Obstructed or narrowed arteries can be identified, and angioplasty applied as a therapeutic measure (see below). Angioplasty requires extensive skill, especially in emergency settings. It is performed by a physician trained in interventional cardiology.

Histopathology

Microscopy image (magn. ca 100x, H&E stain) from autopsy specimen of myocardial infarct (7 days post-infarction).

Microscopy image (magn. ca 100x, H&E stain) from autopsy specimen of myocardial infarct (7 days post-infarction).

Microscopy image of myocardial infarction scar in the heart of a rat

Microscopy image of myocardial infarction scar in the heart of a rat

Histopathological examination of the heart may reveal infarction at autopsy. Under the microscope, myocardial infarction presents as a circumscribed area of ischemic, coagulative necrosis (cell death). On gross examination, the infarct is not identifiable within the first 12 hours.

Although earlier changes can be discerned using electron microscopy, one of the earliest changes under a normal microscope are so-called wavy fibers. Subsequently, the myocyte cytoplasm becomes more eosinophilic (pink) and the cells lose their transversal striations, with typical changes and eventually loss of the cell nucleus. The interstitium at the margin of the infarcted area is initially infiltrated with neutrophils, then with lymphocytes and macrophages, who phagocytose ("eat") the myocyte debris. The necrotic area is surrounded and progressively invaded by granulation tissue, which will replace the infarct with a fibrous (collagenous) scar (which are typical steps in wound healing). The interstitial space (the space between cells outside of blood vessels) may be infiltrated with red blood cells.

These features can be recognized in cases where the perfusion was not restored; reperfused infarcts can have other hallmarks, such as contraction band necrosis.

First aid

As myocardial infarction is a common medical emergency, the signs are often part of first aid courses. The emergency action principles also apply in the case of myocardial infarction.

Immediate care

When symptoms of myocardial infarction occur, people wait an average of three hours, instead of doing what is recommended: calling for help immediately. Acting immediately by calling the emergency services can prevent sustained damage to the heart ("time is muscle").

Certain positions allow the patient to rest in a position which minimizes breathing difficulties. A half-sitting position with knees bent is often recommended. Access to more oxygen can be given by opening the window and widening the collar for easier breathing.

Aspirin can be given quickly (if the patient is not allergic to aspirin); but taking aspirin before calling the emergency medical services may be associated with unwanted delay. Aspirin has an antiplatelet effect which inhibits formation of further thrombi (blood clots) that clog arteries. Non-enteric coated or soluble preparations are preferred. If chewed or dissolved, respectively, they can be absorbed by the body even quicker. If the patient cannot swallow, the aspirin can be used sublingually. U.S. guidelines recommend a dose of 162 – 325 mg. Australian guidelines recommend a dose of 150 – 300 mg.

Glyceryl trinitrate (nitroglycerin) sublingually (under the tongue) can be given if available.

If an Automated External Defibrillator (AED) is available the rescuer should immediately bring the AED to the patient's side and be prepared to follow its instructions, especially should the victim lose consciousness.

If possible the rescuer should obtain basic information from the victim, in case the patient is unable to answer questions once emergency medical technicians arrive. The victim's name and any information regarding the nature of the victim's pain will be useful to health care providers. The exact time that these symptoms started may be critical for determining what interventions can be safely attempted once the victim reaches the medical center. Other useful pieces of information include what the patient was doing at the onset of symptoms, and anything else that might give clues to the pathology of the chest pain. It is also very important to relay any actions that have been taken, such as the number or dose of aspirin or nitroglycerin given, to the EMS personnel.

Other general first aid principles include monitoring pulse, breathing, level of consciousness and, if possible, the blood pressure of the patient. In case of cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be administered.

Automatic external defibrillation (AED)

Since the publication of data showing that the availability of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in public places may significantly increase chances of survival, many of these have been installed in public buildings, public transport facilities, and in non-ambulance emergency vehicles (e.g. police cars and fire engines). AEDs analyze the heart's rhythm and determine whether the rhythm is amenable to defibrillation ("shockable"), as in ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation.

 Emergency services

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Systems vary considerably in their ability to evaluate and treat patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Some provide as little as first aid and early defibrillation. Others employ highly trained paramedics with sophisticated technology and advanced protocols. Early access to EMS is promoted by a 9-1-1 system currently available to 90% of the population in the United States. Most are capable of providing oxygen, IV access, sublingual nitroglycerine, morphine, and aspirin. Some are capable of providing thrombolytic therapy in the prehospital setting.

With primary PCI emerging as the preferred therapy for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, EMS can play a key role in reducing door to balloon intervals (the time from presentation to a hospital ER to the restoration of coronary artery blood flow) by performing a 12 lead ECG in the field and using this information to triage the patient to the most appropriate medical facility. In addition, the 12 lead ECG can be transmitted to the receiving hospital, which enables time saving decisions to be made prior to the patient's arrival. This may include a "cardiac alert" or "STEMI alert" that calls in off duty personnel in areas where the cardiac cath lab is not staffed 24 hours a day. Even in the absence of a formal alerting program, prehospital 12 lead ECGs are independently associated with reduced door to treatment intervals in the emergency department.

Wilderness first aid

In wilderness first aid, a possible heart attack justifies evacuation by the fastest available means, including MEDEVAC, even in the earliest or precursor stages. The patient will rapidly be incapable of further exertion and have to be carried out.

Air travel

Certified personnel traveling by commercial aircraft may be able to assist an MI patient by using the on-board first aid kit, which may contain some cardiac drugs (such as glyceryl trinitrate spray, aspirin, or opioid painkillers), an AED, and oxygen. Pilots may divert the flight to land at a nearby airport. Cardiac monitors are being introduced by some airlines, and they can be used by both on-board and ground-based physicians.

Treatment

A heart attack is a medical emergency which demands both immediate attention and activation of the emergency medical services. The ultimate goal of the management in the acute phase of the disease is to salvage as much myocardium as possible and prevent further complications. As time passes, the risk of damage to the heart muscle increases; hence the phrase that in myocardial infarction, "time is muscle," and time wasted is muscle lost.

The treatments itself may have complications. If attempts to restore the blood flow are initiated after a critical period of only a few hours, the result is reperfusion injury instead of amelioration. Other treatment modalities may also cause complications; the use of antithrombotics for example carries an increased risk of bleeding.

First line

Oxygen, aspirin, glyceryl trinitrate (nitroglycerin) and analgesia (usually morphine, although experts often argue this point), hence the popular mnemonic MONA, morphine, oxygen, nitro, aspirin) are administered as soon as possible. In many areas, first responders can be trained to administer these prior to arrival at the hospital. Morphine is classically the preferred pain relief drug due to its ability to dilate blood vessels, which aids in blood flow to the heart as well as its pain relief properties. However, morphine can also cause hypotension (usually in the setting of hypovolemia), and should be avoided in the case of right ventricular infarction. Moreover, the CRUSADE trial also demonstrated an increase in mortality with administering morphine in the setting of NSTEMI.

Of the first line agents, only aspirin has been proven to decrease mortality.

Once the diagnosis of myocardial infarction is confirmed, other pharmacologic agents are often given. These include beta blockers, anticoagulation (typically with heparin), and possibly additional antiplatelet agents such as clopidogrel. These agents are typically not started until the patient is evaluated by an emergency room physician or under the direction of a cardiologist. These agents can be used regardless of the reperfusion strategy that is to be employed. While these agents can decrease mortality in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction, they can lead to complications and potentially death if used in the wrong setting.

Reperfusion

The concept of reperfusion has become so central to the modern treatment of acute myocardial infarction, that we are said to be in the reperfusion era. Patients who present with suspected acute myocardial infarction and ST segment elevation (STEMI) or new bundle branch block on the 12 lead ECG are presumed to have an occlusive thrombosis in an epicardial coronary artery. They are therefore candidates for immediate reperfusion, either with thrombolytic therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or when these therapies are unsuccessful, bypass surgery.

Individuals without ST segment elevation are presumed to be experiencing either unstable angina (UA) or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). They receive many of the same initial therapies and are often stabilized with antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulated. If their condition remains (hemodynamically) stable, they can be offered either late coronary angiography with subsequent restoration of blood flow (revascularization), or non-invasive stress testing to determine if there is significant ischemia that would benefit from revascularization. If hemodynamic instability develops in individuals with NSTEMIs, they may undergo urgent coronary angiography and subsequent revascularization. The use of thrombolytic agents is contraindicated in this patient subset, however.

The basis for this distinction in treatment regimens is that ST segment elevations on an ECG are typically due to complete occlusion of a coronary artery. On the other hand, in NSTEMIs there is typically a sudden narrowing of a coronary artery with preserved (but diminished) flow to the distal myocardium. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents are given to prevent the narrowed artery from occluding.

At least 10% of patients with STEMI don't develop myocardial necrosis (as evidenced by a rise in cardiac markers) and subsequent Q waves on EKG after reperfusion therapy. Such a successful restoration of flow to the infarct-related artery during an acute myocardial infarction is known as "aborting" the myocardial infarction. If treated within the hour, about 25% of STEMIs can be aborted.

 

 

Thrombolytic therapy

Thrombolytic therapy is indicated for the treatment of STEMI if the drug can be administered within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms, the patient is eligible based on exclusion criteria, and primary PCI is not immediately available. The effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy is highest in the first 2 hours. After 12 hours, the risk associated with thrombolytic therapy outweighs any benefit. Because irreversible injury occurs within 2–4 hours of the infarction, there is a limited window of time available for reperfusion to work.

Thrombolytic drugs are contraindicated for the treatment of unstable angina and NSTEMI and for the treatment of individuals with evidence of cardiogenic shock.

Although no perfect thrombolytic agent exists, an ideal thrombolytic drug would lead to rapid reperfusion, have a high sustained patency rate, be specific for recent thrombi, be easily and rapidly administered, create a low risk for intra-cerebral and systemic bleeding, have no antigenicity, adverse hemodynamic effects, or clinically significant drug interactions, and be cost effective. Currently available thrombolytic agents include streptokinase, urokinase, and alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, rtPA). More recently, thrombolytic agents similar in structure to rtPA such as reteplase and tenecteplase have been used. These newer agents boast efficacy at least as good as rtPA with significantly easier administration. The thrombolytic agent used in a particular individual is based on institution preference and the age of the patient.

Depending on the thrombolytic agent being used, adjuvant anticoagulation with heparin or low molecular weight heparin may be of benefit. With TPa and related agents (reteplase and tenecteplase), heparin is needed to maintain coronary artery patency. Because of the anticoagulant effect of fibrinogen depletion with streptokinase and urokinase treatment, it is less necessary there.

Intracranial bleeding (ICB) and subsequent cerebrovascular accident (CVA) is a serious side effect of thrombolytic use. The risk of ICB is dependent on a number of factors, including a previous episode of intracranial bleed, age of the individual, and the thrombolytic regimen that is being used. In general, the risk of ICB due to thrombolytic use for the treatment of an acute myocardial infarction is between 0.5 and 1 percent.

Thrombolytic therapy to abort a myocardial infarction is not always effective. The degree of effectiveness of a thrombolytic agent is dependent on the time since the myocardial infarction began, with the best results occurring if the thrombolytic agent is used within two hours of the onset of symptoms. If the individual presents more than 12 hours after symptoms commenced, the risk of intracranial bleed are considered higher than the benefits of the thrombolytic agent. Failure rates of thrombolytics can be as high as 20% or higher. In cases of failure of the thrombolytic agent to open the infarct-related coronary artery, the patient is then either treated conservatively with anticoagulants and allowed to "complete the infarction" or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, see below) is then performed. Percutaneous coronary intervention in this setting is known as "rescue PCI" or "salvage PCI". Complications, particularly bleeding, are significantly higher with rescue PCI than with primary PCI due to the action of the thrombolytic agent.

 Monitoring for arrhythmias

Additional objectives are to prevent life-threatening arrhythmias or conduction disturbances. This requires monitoring in a coronary care unit and protocolised administration of antiarrhythmic agents. Antiarrhythmic agents are typically only given to individuals with life-threatening arrhythmias after a myocardial infarction and not to suppress the ventricular ectopy that is often seen after a myocardial infarction.

 

Rehabilitation

Cardiac rehabilitation aims to optimize function and quality of life in those afflicted with a heart disease. This can be with the help of a physician, or in the form of a cardiac rehabilitation program.

Physical exercise is an important part of rehabilitation after a myocardial infarction, with beneficial effects on cholesterol levels, blood pressure, weight, stress and mood. Some patients become afraid of exercising because it might trigger another infarct. Patients are stimulated to exercise, and should only avoid certain exerting activities such as shovelling. Local authorities may place limitations on driving motorised vehicles. Some people are afraid to have sex after a heart attack. Most people can resume sexual activities after 3 to 4 weeks. The amount of activity needs to be dosed to the patient's possibilities.

Secondary prevention

The risk of a recurrent myocardial infarction decreases with strict blood pressure management and lifestyle changes, chiefly smoking cessation, regular exercise, a sensible diet for patients with heart disease, and limitation of alcohol intake.

Patients are usually commenced on several long-term medications post-MI, with the aim of preventing secondary cardiovascular events such as further myocardial infarctions, congestive heart failure or cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Unless contraindicated, such medications may include:

  • Antiplatelet drug therapy such as aspirin and/or clopidogrel should be continued to reduce the risk of plaque rupture and recurrent myocardial infarction. Aspirin is first-line, owing to its low cost and comparable efficacy, with clopidogrel reserved for patients intolerant of aspirin. The combination of clopidogrel and aspirin may further reduce risk of cardiovascular events, however the risk of hemorrhage is increased.
  • Beta blocker therapy such as metoprolol or carvedilol should be commenced. These have been particularly beneficial in high-risk patients such as those with left ventricular dysfunction and/or continuing cardiac ischaemia. β-Blockers decrease mortality and morbidity. They also improve symptoms of cardiac ischemia in NSTEMI.
  • ACE inhibitor therapy should be commenced 24–48 hours post-MI in hemodynamically-stable patients, particularly in patients with a history of MI, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, anterior location of infarct (as assessed by ECG), and/or evidence of left ventricular dysfunction. ACE inhibitors reduce mortality, the development of heart failure, and decrease ventricular remodelling post-MI.
  • Statin therapy has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity post-MI. The effects of statins may be more than their LDL lowering effects. The general consensus is that statins have plaque stabilization and multiple other ("pleiotropic") effects that may prevent myocardial infarction in addition to their effects on blood lipids.
  • The aldosterone antagonist agent eplerenone has been shown to further reduce risk of cardiovascular death post-MI in patients with heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction, when used in conjunction with standard therapies above.
  • Omega-3 fatty acids, commonly found in fish, have been shown to reduce mortality post-MI. While the mechanism by which these fatty acids decrease mortality is unknown, it has been postulated that the survival benefit is due to electrical stabilization and the prevention of ventricular fibrillation.] However, further studies in a high-risk subset have not shown a clear-cut decrease in potentially fatal arrhythmias due to omega-3 fatty acids.

 

Complications

Complications may occur immediately following the heart attack (in the acute phase), or may need time to develop (a chronic problem). After an infarction, an obvious complication is a second infarction, which may occur in the domain of another atherosclerotic coronary artery, or in the same zone if there are any live cells left in the infarct.

Congestive heart failure

A myocardial infarction may compromise the function of the heart as a pump for the circulation, a state called heart failure. There are different types of heart failure; left- or right-sided (or bilateral) heart failure may occur depending on the affected part of the heart, and it is a low-output type of failure. If one of the heart valves is affected, this may cause dysfunction, such as mitral regurgitation in the case of left-sided coronary occlusion that disrupts the blood supply of the papillary muscles. The incidence of heart failure is particularly high in patients with diabetes and requires special management strategies.

Myocardial rupture

Myocardial rupture is most common three to five days after myocardial infarction, commonly of small degree, but may occur one day to three weeks later. In the modern era of early revascularization and intensive pharmacotherapy as treatment for MI, the incidence of myocardial rupture is about 1% of all MIs. This may occur in the free walls of the ventricles, the septum between them, the papillary muscles, or less commonly the atria. Rupture occurs because of increased pressure against the weakened walls of the heart chambers due to heart muscle that cannot pump blood out effectively. The weakness may also lead to ventricular aneurysm, a localized dilation or ballooning of the heart chamber.

Risk factors for myocardial rupture include completion of infarction (no revascularization performed), female sex, advanced age, and a lack of a previous history of myocardial infarction. In addition, the risk of rupture is higher in individuals who are revascularized with a thrombolytic agent than with PCI.[175][176] The shear stress between the infarcted segment and the surrounding normal myocardium (which may be hypercontractile in the post-infarction period) makes it a nidus for rupture.

Rupture is usually a catastrophic event that may result a life-threatening process known as cardiac tamponade, in which blood accumulates within the pericardium or heart sac, and compresses the heart to the point where it cannot pump effectively. Rupture of the intraventricular septum (the muscle separating the left and right ventricles) causes a ventricular septal defect with shunting of blood through the defect from the left side of the heart to the right side of the heart, which can lead to right ventricular failure as well as pulmonary overcirculation. Rupture of the papillary muscle may also lead to acute mitral regurgitation and subsequent pulmonary edema and possibly even cardiogenic shock.

Life-threatening arrhythmia

A 12 lead electrocardiogram showing ventricular tachycardia.

A 12 lead electrocardiogram showing ventricular tachycardia.

Since the electrical characteristics of the infarcted tissue change (see pathophysiology section), arrhythmias are a frequent complication. The re-entry phenomenon may cause rapid heart rates (ventricular tachycardia and even ventricular fibrillation), and ischemia in the electrical conduction system of the heart may cause a complete heart block (when the impulse from the sinoatrial node, the normal cardiac pacemaker, does not reach the heart chambers).

Pericarditis

As a reaction to the damage of the heart muscle, inflammatory cells are attracted. The inflammation may reach out and affect the heart sac. This is called pericarditis. In Dressler's syndrome, this occurs several weeks after the initial event.

Cardiogenic shock

A complication that may occur in the acute setting soon after a myocardial infarction or in the weeks following it is cardiogenic shock. Cardiogenic shock is defined as a hemodynamic state in which the heart cannot produce enough of a cardiac output to supply an adequate amount of oxygenated blood to the tissues of the body.

While the data on performing interventions on individuals with cardiogenic shock is sparse, trial data suggests a long-term mortality benefit in undergoing revascularization if the individual is less than 75 years old and if the onset of the acute myocardial infarction is less than 36 hours and the onset of cardiogenic shock is less than 18 hours. If the patient with cardiogenic shock is not going to be revascularized, aggressive hemodynamic support is warranted, with insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump if not contraindicated. If diagnostic coronary angiography does not reveal a culprit blockage that is the cause of the cardiogenic shock, the prognosis is poor.

Prognosis The prognosis for patients with myocardial infarction varies greatly, depending on the patient, the condition itself and the given treatment. Using simple variables which are immediately available in the emergency room, patients with a higher risk of adverse outcome can be identified. For example, one study found that 0.4% of patients with a low risk profile had died after 90 days, whereas the mortality rate in high risk patients was 21.1%.

Although studies differ in the identified variables, some of the more reproduced risk stratifiers include age, hemodynamic parameters (such as heart failure, cardiac arrest on admission, systolic blood pressure, or Killip class of two or greater), ST-segment deviation, diabetes, serum creatinine concentration, peripheral vascular disease and elevation of cardiac markers.

Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction may increase the predictive power of some risk stratification models. The prognostic importance of Q-waves is debated. Prognosis is significantly worsened if a mechanical complication (papillary muscle rupture, myocardial free wall rupture, and so on) were to occur.

There is evidence that case fatality of myocardial infarction has been improving over the years in all ethnicities.

Legal implications

At common law, a myocardial infarction is generally a disease, but may sometimes be an injury. This has implications for no-fault insurance schemes such as workers' compensation. A heart attack is generally not covered; however, it may be a work-related injury if it results, for example, from unusual emotional stress or unusual exertion. Additionally, in some jurisdictions, heart attacks suffered by persons in particular occupations such as police officers may be classified as line-of-duty injuries by statute or policy. In some countries or states, a person who has suffered from a myocardial infarction may be prevented from participating in activity that puts other people's lives at risk, for example driving a car, taxi or airplane.

Theme: Urgent help at acute heart failure on prehospital stage

 

Acute heart failure

Syndroms:  acute heart failure, acute  left ventricular heart failure, acute right ventricular heart failure; acute left atrial heart failure, acute right atrial heart failure; acute failure either heart and vessels; acute vessels insufficiency.

Acute heart failure (AHF) is always an indication for referral to an intensive care unit. In the widest sense, the term acute heart failure includes the manifestation forms of pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock or rapid-onset decompensated cardiac insufficiency unaccompanied by shock or pulmonary edema (low-output syndrome).

Epidemiology and aetiology

Acute heart failure may occur in the absence of previously known heart disease. Existing prior specific diseases that may end in acute cardiac insufficiency include acute myocardial infarction, decompensated cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, cardiac tamponade, endocarditis or arrhythmogenic heart failure. Coronary heart disease is the aetiology of AHF in 60–70% of patients, particularly in the elderly population.

In younger subjects, AHF is frequently caused by dilated cadiomyopathy, arrhythmia, congenital or valvular heart disease, or myocarditis. The management of heart failure consumes 1–2% of health care expenditure in European countries, with around 75% relating to inpatient care. Advanced heart failure and related acute decompensation have become the single most costly medical syndrome in cardiology.

About 45% of patients hospitalized with AHF will be rehospitalized at least once (and 15% at least twice) within twelve months. Estimates of the risk of death or rehospitalization within 60 days of admission vary from 30 to 60%, depending on the population studied.

Patients with AHF have a very poor prognosis. Mortality is particularly high in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) accompanied by severe heart failure, with a 30% 12 month mortality. Likewise, in acute pulmonary oedema a 12% in-hospital and 40% 1 year mortality have been reported.

Table 1

Causes and precipitating factors in acute heart failure

       I.            Decompensation of pre-existing chronic heart failure (e.g. cardiomyopathy)

    II.            Acute coronary syndromes

                              a.            myocardial infarction/unstable angina with large extent of ischaemia and ischaemic dysfunction

                             b.            mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction

                             c.            right ventricular infarction

 III.            Hypertensive crisis

IV.            Acute arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, atrial fibrillation or flutter, other supraventricular tachycardia)

   V.            Valvular regurgitation (endocarditis, rupture of chordae tendinae, worsening of pre-existing valvular regurgitation)

VI.            Severe aortic valve stenosis

VII.            Acute severe myocarditis

VIII.            Cardiac tamponade

IX.            Aortic dissection

   X.            Post-partum cardiomyopathy

XI.            Non-cardiovascular precipitating factors

                              a.            lack of compliance with medical treatment

                             b.            volume overload

                             c.            infections, particularly pneumonia or septicaemia

                             d.            severe brain insult

                              e.            after major surgery

                               f.            reduction in renal function

                             g.            asthma

                             h.            drug abuse

                                i.            alcohol abuse

                                j.            phaeochromocytoma

 

XII.            High output syndromes

                              a.            septicaemia

                             b.            thyrotoxicosis crisis

                             c.            anaemia

                             d.            shunt syndromes

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Myocardial contraction

Myocardial cells (myocytes) are about 50-100 |im long; each cell branches and interdigitates with adjacent cells. An intercalated disc permits electrical conduction (via gap junctions) and mechanical conduction (via the fascia adherens)

to adjacent cells. The basic unit of contraction is the sarcomere (2 \m\ in length), which is aligned to those of adjacent myofibrils, giving a striated appearance due to the Z-lines (see Fig. 12.4). Actin filaments (molecular weight 47 000) are attached at right angles to the Z-lines and interdigitate with thicker parallel myosin filaments (molecular weight 500 000). The cross-links between actin and myosin molecules contain myofibrillar ATPase, which breaks down adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to provide the energy for contraction. Two chains of actin molecules form a helical structure, with a second molecule, tropomyosin, in the grooves of the actin helix, and a further molecule, troponin, attached to every seventh actin molecule (see Fig. 12.5). During contraction, shortening of the sarcomere results from the interdigitation of the actin and myosin molecules,

without altering the length of either molecule. Contraction is initiated when calcium is made available during the plateau phase of the action potential by calcium ions entering the cell and being mobilised from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. As its concentration rises, calcium binds to troponin, precipitating contraction. The force of cardiac muscle contraction, or inotropic state, is regulated by the influx of calcium ions through 'slow calcium channels'. The extent to which the sarcomere can shorten determines stroke volume of the ventricle. It is  maximally shortened in response to powerful inotropic drugs or severe exercise.

 

 

                       Fig. 1. Contraction process with the muscle fibre


 

 


Fig. 2. Normal heart structures

Factors influencing cardiac output

Cardiac output is determined by the product of stroke volume and heart rate. Stroke volume is dependent upon enddiastolic pressure (preload) and peripheral vascular resistance (afterload). Stretch of cardiac muscle (arising from an increment in end-diastolic volume or preload) results in the increased force of contraction, producing an increase in stroke volume. This relationship is known as Starling's Law of the heart. Afterload falls as blood pressure is reduced and this

allows greater shortening of the muscle fibres and hence increased stroke volume. The contractile state of the myocardium is controlled, in part, by the neuro-endocrine system; it is also influenced by various inotropic drugs and their antagonists. Determination of the response to a physiological change or to a drug can be predicted on the basis of its combined influence on preload, afterload and contractility.

Factors influencing resistance to systemic blood flow

Systemic blood flow is critically dependent upon vascular resistance, which varies with the fourth power of the radius of the resistance vessel. Thus small changes in calibre have a marked influence on blood flow. Metabolic and mechanical factors control arteriolar tone. Neurogenic constriction operates

via oe-adrenoceptors on vascular smooth muscle, and dilatation via muscarinic and f52-adrenoceptors. In addition, systemic and locally released vasoactive substances influence tone; vasoconstrictors include noradrenaline, angiotensin II and endothelin, whereas adenosine, bradykinin, prostaglandins and nitric oxide are vasodilators. Resistance to blood flow rises with viscosity, and is mainly influenced by red cell concentration (haematocrit).

Factors influencing resistance to coronary blood flow

Coronary blood vessels receive sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation. Stimulation of oc-adrenoceptors causes vasoconstriction; stimulation of P2-adrenoceptors causes vasodilatation; the predominant effect of sympathetic stimulation in coronary arteries is vasodilatation. Parasympathetic stimulation also causes modest dilatation of normal coronary arteries. Healthy coronary endothelium releases nitric oxide which promotes vasodilatation, but if the endothelium is damaged by atheroma, vasoconstriction may predominate.

Systemic hormones, neuropeptides and other locally derived factors such as endothelins, which are the most potent vasoconstrictors identified, also influence arterial tone and coronary flow. A similar balance exists in the systemic circulation

and influences peripheral vascular tone and blood pressure. As a result of vascular regulation, an atheromatous narrowing (stenosis) in a coronary artery does not limit flow, even during exercise, until the cross-sectional area of the vessel is reduced by at least 70%.

The vicious circle in the acute failing heart

    The final common denominator in the syndrome of AHF is a critical inability of the myocardium to maintain a cardiac output sufficient to meet the demands of the peripheral circulation. Irrespective of the underlying cause of AHF, a vicious circle is activated that, if not appropriately treated, leads to chronic heart failure and death. This is shown in Figure, and is described in detail elsewhere.

 Fig. 3.  Pathophysiology of the syndrome of acute heart failure.

Following acute critical events, LV deterioration occurs rapidly and requires urgent medical treatment. The pathophysiology of the syndrome of heart failure is summarized. Mechanical, haemodynamic and neurohormonal changes are similar but not identical to those observed in CHF. The time course of development or reversal of these changes varies considerably and strongly depends on the underlying cause of LV deterioration as well as pre-existing cardiovascular disease. However, changes develop rapidly and therefore AHF is considerably different to the syndrome of CHF.

In order for patients with AHF to respond to treatment the myocardial dysfunction must be reversible. This is particularly important in AHF due to ischaemia, stunning or hibernation, where a dysfunctional myocardium can return to normal when appropriately treated.

Myocardial stunning

Myocardial stunning is the myocardial dysfunction that occurs following prolonged ischaemia, which may persist in the short-term even when normal blood flow is restored. The intensity and duration of stunning is dependent on the severity and duration of the preceding ischaemic insult.

Hibernation
Hibernation is defined as an impairment of myocardial function due to severely reduced coronary blood flow although myocardial cells are still intact. By improving blood flow and oxygenation, hibernating myocardium can restore its normal function.

Hibernating myocardium and stunning can co-exist. Hibernation improves in time with reinstitution of blood flow and oxygenation, whilst stunned myocardium retains inotropic reserve and can respond to inotropic stimulation. Since these mechanisms depend on the duration of myocardial damage, a rapid restoration of oxygenation and blood flow is mandatory to reverse these pathophysiological alterations.

 

 

classification

Killip classification

The Killip classification was designed to provide a clinical estimate of the severity of myocardial derangement in the treatment of AMI:

  • StageI—No heart failure. No clinical signs of cardiac decompensation;
  • StageII—Heart failure. Diagnostic criteria include rales, S3 gallop and pulmonary venous hypertension. Pulmonary congestion with wet rales in the lower half of the lung fields;
  • StageIII—Severe heart failure. Frank pulmonary oedema with rales throughout the lung fields;
  • StageIV—Cardiogenic shock. Signs include hypotension (SBP≤90mmHg), and evidence of peripheral vasoconstriction such as oliguria, cyanosis and diaphoresis.

                                                           Table 2

Killip Classification System

Killip Class

Characteristics

Patients (%)

I

No evidence of congestive heart failure

85

II

Rales, ↑ JVD, or S3 gallop

13

III

Pulmonary edema

1

IV

Cardiogenic Shock

 

Forrester classification

The Forrester AHF classification was also developed in AMI patients, and describes four groups according to clinical and haemodynamic status (Figure). Patients are classified clinically on the basis of peripheral hypoperfusion (filliform pulse, cold clammy skin, peripheral cyanosis, hypotension, tachycardia, confusion, oliguria) and pulmonary congestion (rales, abnormal chest X-ray), and haemodynamically on the basis of a depressed cardiac index (≤2.2 L/min/m2) and elevated pulmonary capillary pressure (>18 mmHg). The original paper defined the treatment strategy according to the clinical and haemodynamic status. Mortality was 2.2% in group I, 10.1% in group II, 22.4% in group III, and 55.5% in group IV.


Fig.4.  Clinical classification of the mode of heart failure (Forrester classification). H I-IV refers to haemodynamic severity, with reference figures for CI and pulmonary capillary pressures shown on the vertical and horizontal axes, respectively. C I-IV refers to clinical severity.

 

‘Clinical severity’ classification


The clinical severity classification is based on observation of the peripheral circulation (perfusion) and on auscultation of the lungs (congestion). The patients can be classified as Class I (Group A) (warm and dry), Class II (Group B) (warm and wet), Class III (Group L) (cold and dry), and Class IV (Group C) (cold and wet). This classification has been validated prognostically in a cardiomyopathy service, and is therefore applicable to patients with chronic heart failure, whether hospitalized or outpatients.

clinical

The patient with acute heart failure may present with one of several distinct clinical conditions (Table 2):

       I.            Acute decompensated heart failure (de novo or as decompensation of chronic heart failure) with signs and symptoms of acute heart failure, which are mild and do not fulfil criteria for cardiogenic shock, pulmonary oedema or hypertensive crisis.

    II.            Hypertensive AHF: Signs and symptoms of heart failure are accompanied by high blood pressure and relatively preserved left ventricular function with a chest radiograph compatible with acute pulmonary oedema.

 III.            Pulmonary oedema (verified by chest X-ray) accompanied by severe respiratory distress, with crackles over the lung and orthopnoea, with O2 saturation usually <90% on room air prior to treatment.

IV.            Cardiogenic shock: Cardiogenic shock is defined as evidence of tissue hypoperfusion induced by heart failure after correction of pre-load. There is no clear definition for haemodynamic parameters, which explains the differences in prevalence and outcome reported in studies (Table 3), but cardiogenic shock is usually characterized by reduced blood pressure (systolic BP <90 mmHg or a drop of mean arterial pressure>30 mmHg) and/or low urine output (<0.5 ml/kg/h), with a pulse rate >60 b.p.m. with or without evidence of organ congestion. There is a continuum from low cardiac output syndrome to cardiogenic shock.

   V.            High output failure is characterized by high cardiac output, usually with high heart rate (caused by arrhythmias, thyrotoxicosis, anaemia, Paget's disease, iatrogenic or by other mechanisms), with warm peripheries, pulmonary congestion, and sometimes with low BP as in septic shock.

VI.            Right heart failure is characterized by low output syndrome with increased

      jugular venous pressure, increased liver size and hypotension.

Table 3

Terminology and common clinical and haemodynamic characteristics

Clinical status

Heart rate

SBP mmHg

CI L/min/m2

PCWP mmHg

Congestion Killip/Forrester

Diuresis

Hypoperfusion

End organ hypoperfusion


 

I Acute decompensated congestive heart failure

+/–

Low normal/High

Low normal/High

Mild elevation

K II/F II

+

+/–

II Acute heart failure with hypertension/hypertensive crisis

Usually increased

High

+/–

>18

K II-IV/FII-III

+/–

+/–

+, with CNS symptoms

III Acute heart failure with pulmonary oedema

+

Low normal

Low

Elevated

KIII/FII

+

+/–

IVa Cardiogenic shock*/low output syndrome

+

Low normal

Low, <2.2

>16

K III-IV/F I-III

low

+

+

IVb Severe cardiogenic shock

>90

<90

<1.8

>18

K IV/F IV

Very low

++

+

V High output failure

+

+/–

+

+/–

KII/FI-II

+

VI Right sided acute heart failure

Usually low

Low

Low

Low

F I

+/–

+/–, acute onset

+/–

There are exceptions; the above values in table are general rules.

*The differentation from low cardiac output syndrome is subjective and the clinical presentation may overlap these classifications.

SBP=systolic blood pressure; CI=cardiac index; PCWP=pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; CNS=central nervous system.

Various other classifications of the acute heart failure syndrome are utilized in coronary care and intensive care units. The Killip classification is based on clinical signs and chest X-ray findings, and the Forrester classification is based on clinical signs and haemodynamic characteristics. These classifications have been validated in acute heart failure after AMI and thus are best applied to acute de novo heart failure. The third ‘clinical severity’ classification has been validated in a cardiomyopathy service and is based on clinical findings. It is most applicable to chronic decompensated heart failure.

The clinical syndrome of AHF

AHF is a clinical syndrome, with reduced cardiac output, tissue hypoperfusion, increase in the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and tissue congestion. The underlying mechanism may be cardiac or extra-cardiac, and may be transient and reversible with resolution of the acute syndrome, or may induce permanent damage leading to chronic heart failure. The cardiac dysfunction can be related to systolic or diastolic myocardial dysfunction (mainly induced by ischaemia or infection), acute valvular dysfunction, pericardial tamponade, abnormalities of cardiac rhythm, or pre-load/after-load mismatch. Multiple extra-cardiac pathologies may result in acute heart failure by changing the cardiac loading conditions for example (I) increased after-load due to systemic or pulmonary hypertension or massive pulmonary emboli, (II) increased pre-load due to increased volume intake or reduced excretion due to renal failure or endocrinopathy, or (II) high output state due to infection, thyrotoxicosis, anaemia, Paget's disease. Heart failure can be complicated by co-existing end-organ disease. Severe heart failure can also induce multi-organ failure, which may be lethal.

Appropriate long-term medical therapy and, if possible, anatomical correction of the underlying pathology may prevent further AHF syndrome ‘attacks’ and improve the poor long-term prognosis associated with this syndrome.

The clinical AHF syndrome may be classified as predominantly left or right forward failure, left or right backward failure, or a combination of these.

Forward (left and right) AHF

     Forward acute heart failure may be mild-to-moderate with only effort fatigue, up to severe with manifestations of reduced tissue perfusion at rest with weakness, confusion, drowsiness, paleness with peripheral cyanosis, cold clammy skin, low blood pressure, filliform pulse, and oliguria, culminating in the full blown presentation of cardiogenic shock.

This syndrome may be induced by a large variety of pathologies. An adequate history may indicate the main diagnosis for example (I) acute coronary syndrome with the relevant risk factors, past history, and suggestive symptoms; (II) acute myocarditis with a recent history suggestive of acute viral infection; (III) acute valvular dysfunction with a history of chronic valve disease or valve surgery, infection with the possibility of bacterial endocarditis, or chest trauma; (IV) pulmonary embolism with a relevant history and suggestive symptoms; or (V) pericardial tamponade.

Physical examination of the cardiovascular system may be indicative of the main diagnosis, for example by distended neck veins and paradoxical pulse (pericardial tamponade), muffled heart sounds related to myocardial systolic dysfunction, or the disappearance of artificial valve sounds or an appropriate murmur indicating a valvular problem.

In forward AHF immediate management should include supportive treatment to improve cardiac output and tissue oxygenation. This can be achieved with vasodilating agents, fluid replacement to achieve an optimal pre-load, short-term inotropic support and (sometimes) intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.

Left-heart backward failure


Left-heart backward failure may be related to left ventricular dysfunction with varying degrees of severity, from mild-to-moderate with only exertional dyspnoea, to pulmonary oedema presenting with shortness of breath (dry cough, sometimes with frothy sputum), pallor or even cyanosis, cold clammy skin, and normal or elevated blood pressure. Fine rales are usually audible over the lung fields. Chest X-ray shows pulmonary congestion/oedema.

Pathology of the left heart may be responsible for this syndrome, including: myocardial dysfunction related to chronic existing conditions; acute insult such as myocardial ischaemia or infarction; aortic and mitral valve dysfunction; cardiac rhythm disturbances; or tumours of the left heart. Extra-cardiac pathologies may include severe hypertension, high output states (anaemia, thyrotoxicosis) and neurogenic states (brain tumours or trauma).

Physical examination of the cardiovascular system, including the apex beat, the quality of the heart sounds, the presence of murmurs, and auscultation of the lungs for fine rales and expiratory wheezing (‘cardiac asthma’) may be indicative of the main diagnosis.

In left heart backward failure patients should be treated mainly with vasodilation and the addition of diuretics, bronchodilators and narcotics, as required. Respiratory support may be necessary. This can either be with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, or in some circumstances invasive ventilation may be required following endotracheal intubation.

Right-heart backward failure

The syndrome of acute right heart failure is related to pulmonary and right heart dysfunction, including exacerbations of chronic lung disease with pulmonary hypertension, or acute massive lung disease (e.g. massive pneumonia or pulmonary embolism), acute right ventricular infarction, tricuspid valve malfunction (traumatic or infectious), and acute or sub-acute pericardial disease. Advanced left heart disease progressing to right-sided failure should also be considered, and similarly long-standing congenital heart disease with evolving right ventricular failure should be taken into account. Non-cardiopulmonary pathologies include nephritic/nephrotic syndrome and end-stage liver disease. Various vasoactive peptide-secreting tumours should also be considered.

The typical presentation is with fatigue, pitting ankle oedema, tenderness in the upper abdomen (due to liver congestion), shortness of breath (with pleural effusion) and distension of the abdomen (with ascites). The full-blown syndrome includes anasarca with liver dysfunction and oliguria.

History and physical examination should confirm the syndrome of acute right heart failure, indicate the suspected diagnosis and guide further investigation, which is likely to include ECG, blood gases, D-dimer, chest X-ray, cardiac Doppler-echocardiography, angiography or chest CT scan.

In right heart backward failure fluid overload is managed with diuretics, including spironolactone, and sometimes with a short course of low dose (‘diuretic dose’) of dopamine. Concomitant treatment may include: antibiotics for pulmonary infection and bacterial endocarditis; Ca++ channel blockers, nitric oxide, or prostaglandins for primary pulmonary hypertension; and anticoagulants, thrombolytics, or thrombectomy for acute pulmonary embolism.

Diagnosis of AHF

The diagnosis of AHF is based on the symptoms and clinical findings, supported by appropriate investigations such as ECG, chest X-ray, biomarkers, and Doppler-echocardiography (Fig. 5).

video

The patient should be classified according to previously described criteria for systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction (Fig. 6), and by the characteristics of forward or backward left or right heart failure.

An abnormal echocardiogram.  Image shows a mid-muscular ventricular septal defect. The trace in the lower left shows the cardiac cycle and the red mark the time in the cardiac cycle that the image was captured.  Colors are used to represent the velocity and direction of blood flow.

Fig. 5. An abnormal echocardiogram. Colors are used to represent the velocity and direction of blood flow

 

Fig. 6. Diastolic and systolic dysfunction

Fig. 7.  Diagnosis of AHF

 

Fig. 7. Assessment of LV function in AHF.

 

Electrocardiogram (ECG)

     A normal ECG is uncommon in acute heart failure. The ECG is able to identify the rhythm, and may help determine the aetiology of AHF and assess the loading conditions of the heart. It is essential in the assessment of acute coronary syndromes. The ECG may also indicate acute right or left ventricular or atrial strain, perimyocarditis and pre-existing conditions such as left and right ventricular hypertrophy or dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiac arrhythmia should be assessed in the 12-lead ECG as well as in continuous ECG monitoring.

Chest X-ray and imaging techniques

Chest X-ray and other imaging should be performed early for all patients with AHF to evaluate pre-existing chest or cardiac conditions (cardiac size and shape) and to assess pulmonary congestion. It is used both for confirmation of the diagnosis, and for follow-up of improvement or unsatisfactory response to therapy. Chest X-ray allows the differential diagnosis of left heart failure from inflammatory or infectious lung diseases. Chest CT scan with or without contrast angiography and scintigraphy may be used to clarify the pulmonary pathology and diagnose major pulmonary embolism. CT scan or transesophageal echocardiography should be used in cases of suspicion of aortic dissection.

Laboratory tests

A number of laboratory tests should be performed in AHF patients (Table). Arterial blood gas analysis (Astrup) enables assessment of oxygenation (pO2), respiratory adequacy (pCO2), acid–base balance (pH), and base deficit, and should be performed in all patients with severe heart failure. Non-invasive measurement with pulse oximetry and end-tidal CO2 can often replace Astrup (Level of evidence C) but not in very low output, vasocontricted shock states. Measurement of venous O2 saturation (i.e. in the jugular vein) may be useful for an estimation of the total body oxygen supply-demand balance.

Table 4

Laboratory tests in patients hospitalized with AHF

Blood count

Always

Platelet count

Always

INR

If patient anticoagulated or in severe heart failure

CRP

Always

D-dimer

Always (may be falsely positive if CRP elevated or patient has been hospitalized for prolonged period)

Urea and Electrolytes (Na+, K+, Urea, Creatinine)

Always

Blood glucose

Always

CKMB, cardiac TnI/TnT

Always

Arterial blood gases

In severe heart failure, or in diabetic patients

Transaminases

To be considered

Urinanalysis

To be considered

Plasma BNP or NTproBNP

To be considered

Other specific laboratory tests should be taken for differential diagnostic purposes or in order to identify end-organ dysfunction.

INR=international normalized ratio of thromboplastin time; TnI=troponin I; TnT=troponin T.

Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is released from the cardiac ventricles in response to increased wall stretch and volume overload and has been used to exclude and/or identify congestive heart failure (CHF) in patients admitted, for dyspnoea, to the emergency department. Decision cut points of 300 pg/mL for NT-proBNP and 100 pg/mL for BNP have been proposed, but the older population has been poorly studied. During ‘flash’ pulmonary oedema, BNP levels may remain normal at the time of admission. Otherwise, BNP has a good negative predictive value to exclude heart failure. Various clinical conditions may affect the BNP concentration including renal failure and septicaemia. If elevated concentrations are present, further diagnostic tests are required. If AHF is confirmed, increased levels of plasma BNP and NT-pro BNP carry important prognostic information. The exact role of BNP remains to be fully clarified.

Echocardiography
   Echocardiography is an essential tool for the evaluation of the functional and structural changes underlying or associated with AHF, as well as in the assessment of acute coronary syndromes.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence C

Echocardiography with Doppler imaging should be used to evaluate and monitor regional and global left and right ventricular function, valvular structure and function, possible pericardial pathology, mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction and—on rare occasions—space occupying lesions. Cardiac output can be estimated by appropriate Doppler aortic or pulmonary time velocity contour measurements. An appropriate echo-Doppler study can also estimate pulmonary artery pressures (from the tricuspid regurgitation jet) and has also been used for the monitoring of left ventricular pre-load.  Echocardiography has not been validated with right heart catheterization in patients with AHF.

Fig.  8. Echocardiographic Images in a Normal Person (Panel A) and the Patient with Diastolic Heart Failure (Panel B).

Other investigations
In cases of coronary-artery-related complications such as unstable angina or myocardial infarction, angiography is important and angiography-based revascularization therapy has been shown to improve prognosis.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence B

Coronary arteriography is also often indicated in prolonged AHF, unexplained by other investigations, as recommended in the guidelines for diagnosis of CHF.

Insertion of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) may assist in making the diagnosis of AHF. See Section 7.2.3 for further details.

                                                                                                                                                      Table 5

Non-invasive monitoring

In all critically ill patients, BP measurements should be made routinely; blood pressure, temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, the electrocardiogram and blood pressure is mandatory. Some laboratory tests should be done repeatedly i.e. electrolytes, creatinine and glucose or markers for infection or other metabolic disorders. Hypo– or hyperkalaemia must be controlled. These can all be monitored easily and accurately with modern automated equipment. If the patient becomes more unwell, the frequency of these observations will need to be increased.

ECG monitoring (arrhythmias and ST segment) is necessary during the acute decompensation phase, particularly if ischaemia or arrhythmia is responsible for the acute event.

The immediate goals are to improve symptoms and to stabilize the haemodynamic condition (Table 6). An improvement in haemodynamic parameters only may be misleading, however, and a concomitant improvement in symptoms (dyspnoea and/or fatigue) is generally required. These short-term benefits must also be accompanied by favourable effects on longer-term outcomes. This is likely to be achieved by avoidance, or limitation, of myocardial damage.

Instrumentation and monitoring of patients in AHF
Monitoring of the patient with AHF should be initiated as soon as possible after his/her arrival at the emergency unit, concurrently with ongoing diagnostic measures addressed at determining the primary aetiology. The types and level of monitoring required for any individual patient vary widely depending on the severity of the cardiac decompensation and the response to initial therapy. Local logistic issues may also be relevant. The guidelines on monitoring discussed here are based on expert opinion.

 

Table 6

Goals of treatment of the patient with AHF

Clinical

{downarrow} symptoms (dyspnoea and/or fatigue)

{downarrow} clinical signs

{downarrow} body weight

{uparrow} diuresis

{uparrow} oxygenation

Laboratory

Serum electrolyte normalization

{downarrow} BUN and/or creatinine

{downarrow} S-bilirubin

{downarrow} plasma BNP

Blood glucose normalization

Haemodynamic

{downarrow} pulmonary capillary wedge pressure to <18 mmHg

{uparrow} cardiac output and/or stroke volume

Outcome

{downarrow} length of stay in the intensive care unit

{downarrow} duration of hospitalization

{uparrow} time to hospital re-admission

{downarrow} mortality

Tolerability

Low rate of withdrawal from therapeutic measures

Low incidence of adverse effects

BUN=blood urea nitrogen.

Best results are achieved if patients with AHF are treated promptly by expert staff in areas reserved for heart failure patients. An experienced cardiologist and/or other suitably trained staff should treat AHF patients. The diagnostic services should provide early access to diagnostic procedures such as echocardiography and coronary angiography, as needed.

Treatment of patients with AHF requires a treatment plan in the hospital system.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence B

Comparative studies have shown shorter hospitalization time in patients treated by staff trained in heart failure management. The treatment of AHF should be followed by a subsequent HF clinic programme when applicable and as recommended by ESC guidelines.

The care and information needs of the acutely ill patient and his/her family will usually be addressed by expert nurses.

Heart failure staff nurses and cardiology/heart failure/intensive care specialists should be given the opportunity for continuing professional education.

Recommendations on the standard structure, nursing staff and equipment requirements in intensive cardiology care units and relevant step-down care units based on the expert opinion of the Working Group of Acute Cardiac Care are under preparation.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence C

Maintenance of normal blood pressure is critical during the initiation of therapy, and consequently it should be measured regularly (e.g. every 5 minutes), until the dosage of vasodilators, diuretics or inotropes has been stabilized. The reliability of non-invasive, automatic plethysmographic measurement of blood pressure is good in the absence of intense vasoconstriction and very high heart rate.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence C

The pulse oximeter is a simple non-invasive device that estimates the arterial saturation of haemoglobin with oxygen (SaO2). The estimate of the SaO2 is usually within 2% of a measured value from a co-oximeter, unless the patient is in cardiogenic shock. The pulse oximeter should be used continuously on any unstable patient who is being treated with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) that is greater than in air. It should also be used at regular intervals (every hour) on any patient receiving oxygen therapy for an acute decompensation.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence C

Cardiac output and pre-load can be monitored non-invasively with the use of Doppler techniques. There is little to no evidence to help choose which of these to monitor and it makes no difference as long as the limitations of individual monitoring devices are understood and the data are used appropriately.

Class IIb recommendation, level of evidence C

Invasive monitoring.

Arterial line.
The indications for the insertion of an in-dwelling arterial catheter are the need for either continuous beat-to-beat analysis of arterial blood pressure due to haemodynamic instability or the requirement for multiple arterial blood analyses. The complication rate for the insertion of a 20-gauge 2-inch radial artery catheter is low.

Class IIb recommendation, level of evidence C

Central venous pressure lines.
Central venous lines provide access to the central venous circulation and are therefore useful for the delivery of fluids and drugs and can also be used to monitor the CVP and venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) in the superior vena cava (SVC) or right atrium, which provides an estimate of oxygen transport.

Class II b recommendation, level of evidence C

Caution has to be advised, however, to avoid the over-interpretation of right atrial pressure measurements, as these rarely correlate with left atrial pressures, and therefore left ventricular (LV) filling pressures, in patients with AHF. CVP measurements are also affected by the presence of significant tricuspid regurgitation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence C

Pulmonary artery catheter.
The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is a balloon flotation catheter that measures pressures in the superior vena cava (SVC), right atrium, right ventricle and pulmonary artery as well as cardiac output. Modern catheters can measure the cardiac output semi-continuously as well as the mixed venous oxygen saturation and right ventricular end diastolic volume and ejection fraction.

Although the insertion of a PAC for the diagnosis of AHF is usually unnecessary, it can be used to distinguish between a cardiogenic and a non-cardiogenic mechanism in complex patients with concurrent cardiac and pulmonary disease. The PAC is also frequently used to estimate PCWP, cardiac output and other haemodynamic variables and therefore guide therapy in the presence of severe diffuse pulmonary pathology or ongoing haemodynamic compromise not resolved by initial therapy. PCWP is not an accurate reflection of left ventricular end–diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in patients with mitral stenosis (MS) aortic regurgitation (AR), ventricular interdependence, high airway pressure, or stiff LV, due to, for example, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), diabetes, fibrosis, inotropes, obesity, ischaemia. Severe tricuspid regurgitation, frequently found in patients with AHF, can overestimate or underestimate cardiac output measured by thermodilution.

Several retrospective studies assessing the use of the PAC in acute myocardial infarction demonstrated increased mortality with the PAC. These observations were partially explained by case-mix differences between the groups of the study. Similar observational findings have subsequently been reported in other groups of patients. A recent prospective randomized study enrolling a mixed group of critically ill patients failed to demonstrate a difference in outcome, although randomization to the PAC led to increased fluid resuscitation within the first 24 h. The PAC did not cause harm to patients, rather it was the use of the information derived from the catheter (sometimes in an inappropriate fashion) that was detrimental.

The use of a PAC is recommended in haemodynamically unstable patients who are not responding in a predictable fashion to traditional treatments, and in patients with a combination of congestion and hypoperfusion. In these cases it is inserted in order to ensure optimal fluid loading of the ventricles and to guide vasoactive therapies and inotropic agents. Because the complications increase with the duration of its use, it is critical to insert the catheter when specific data are needed (usually regarding the fluid status of the patient) and to remove it as soon as it is of no further help (i.e. when diuretic and vasodilating therapy have been optimized).

treatment of AHF

                                                                                       Table 7


Fig.  9. Immediate goals in treatment of the patients with AHF.

In coronary patients mean blood pressure (mBP) should be higher to ensure coronary perfusion, mBP >70, or systolic >90 mmHg.

Another objective of treatment is reduction in the clinical signs of HF. A reduction in body weight, and/or an increase in diuresis, are beneficial effects of therapy in congestive and oliguric patients with AHF. Similarly, an improvement in oxygen saturation, renal and/or hepatic function, and/or serum electrolytes are meaningful goals of treatment. Plasma BNP concentration can reflect haemodynamic improvement and decreased levels are beneficial.

Beneficial effects of therapy on outcome include reductions in the duration of intravenous vasoactive therapy, the length of stay, and the readmission rate with an increase in the time to readmission. A reduction in both in-hospital and long-term mortality is also a major goal of treatment.

Lastly, a favourable safety and tolerability profile is also necessary for any treatment used in patients with AHF. Any agent used in this condition should be associated with a low withdrawal rate with a relatively low incidence of untoward side effects.

 

Organization of the treatment of AHF

Table 8

  General therapeutic approach in AHF by findings on invasive haemodynamic monitoring

Haemodynamic characteristic

Suggested therapeutic approach


 

CI

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Maintained

PCWP

Low

High or Normal

High

High

High

SBP mmHg

 

>85

<85

>85

 

Outline of therapy

Fluid loading

Vasodilator (nitroprusside, NTG) fluid loading may become necessary

Consider inotropic agents (dobutamine, dopamine) and i.v. diuretics

Vasodilators (nitroprusside, NTG) and i.v. diuretics and consider inotrope (dobutamine, levosimendan, PDEI)

i.v. diuretics If SBP is low, vasoconstrictive inotropes

In AHF patients: Decreased CI: <2.2 L/min/m2; PCWP: low if <14 mmHg, high if >18–20 mmHg.                                                                                                                             

Class IIb recommendation, level of evidence C

In cardiogenic shock and prolonged severe low output syndrome it is recommended that the mixed venous oxygen saturation from the pulmonary artery be measured as an estimation of oxygen extraction (SpO2–SvO2). The aim should be to maintain SvO2 above 65% in patients with AHF.

General medical issues in the treatment of AHF

Infections: Patients with advanced AHF are prone to infectious complications, commonly respiratory or urinary tract infections, septicaemia, or nosocomial infection with Gram positive bacteria. An increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) and a decrease in general condition may be the only signs of infection—fever may be absent. Meticulous infection control and measures to maintain skin integrity are mandatory. Routine cultures are recommended. Prompt antibiotic therapy should be given when indicated.

Diabetes: AHF is associated with impaired metabolic control. Hyperglycaemia occurs commonly. Routine hypoglycaemic drugs should be stopped and glycaemic control should be obtained by using short-acting insulin titrated according to repeated blood glucose measurements. Normoglycaemia improves survival in diabetic patients who are critically ill.

Catabolic state: negative caloric and nitrogen balance is a problem in ongoing AHF. This is related to reduced caloric intake due to reduced intestinal absorption. Care should be undertaken to maintain calorie and nitrogen balance. Serum albumin concentration, as well as nitrogen balance, may help to monitor metabolic status.

Renal failure: a close interrelationship exists between AHF and renal failure. Both may cause, aggravate, and influence, the outcome of the other. Close monitoring of renal function is mandatory. Preservation of renal function is a major consideration in the selection of the appropriate therapeutic strategy for these patients.

Oxygen and ventilatory assistance
Rationale for using oxygen in AHF
The maintenance of an SaO2 within the normal range (95–98%) is important in order to maximize oxygen delivery to the tissues and tissue oxygenation, thus helping to prevent end-organ dysfunction and multiple organ failure.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence C

This is best achieved first by ensuring that there is a patent airway and then by administration of an increased FiO2. Endotracheal intubation is indicated if these measures fail to improve tissue oxygenation.

Class IIa recommendation, level of evidence C

Despite this intuitive approach to giving oxygen, there is little to no evidence available that giving increasing doses of oxygen results in an improved outcome. Studies have demonstrated that hyperoxia can be associated with reduced coronary blood flow, reduced cardiac output, increased blood pressure, increased systemic vascular resistance, and a trend to higher mortality.

The administration of increased concentrations of oxygen to hypoxaemic patients with acute cardiac failure is unquestionably warranted.

Class IIa recommendation, level of evidence C

The use of increased concentrations of oxygen in patients without evidence of hypoxaemia is more controversial and may cause harm.

Ventilatory support without endotracheal intubation (non-invasive ventilation)

Two techniques are used for ventilatory support: CPAP or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). NIPPV is a method of providing mechanical ventilation to patients without the need for endotracheal intubation. There is a strong consensus that one of these two techniques should be used before endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Utilization of non-invasive techniques dramatically reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Rationale
Application of CPAP can cause pulmonary recruitment and is associated with an increase in the functional residual capacity. The improved pulmonary compliance, reduced transdiaphragmatic pressure swings, and decreased diaphragmatic activity can lead to a decrease in the overall work of breathing and therefore a decreased metabolic demand from the body. NIPPV is a more sophisticated technique that requires a ventilator. Addition of a PEEP to the inspiratory assistance results in a CPAP mode (also known as bilevel positive pressure support, BiPAP). The physiological benefits of this mode of ventilation are the same as for CPAP but also include the inspiratory assist which further reduces the work of breathing and the overall metabolic demand.

Evidence for the use of CPAP and NIPPV in left ventricular failure

CPAP in patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema improves oxygenation, decreases symptoms and signs of AHF, and results in a decreased need for endotracheal intubation. The studies have been relatively small and therefore have not reported a statistically significant reduction in mortality. A systematic review following the first three trials suggested that CPAP was associated with a decreased need for intubation and a trend to decreased in-hospital mortality compared to standard therapy alone. Evidence was lacking, however, on the potential for CPAP to actually cause harm.

There have been three randomized controlled trials of the use of NIPPV in the setting of acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. NIPPV appears to decrease the need for endotracheal intubation, but this does not translate into a reduction in mortality or improvement in long-term function.

Conclusions
The use of CPAP and NIPPV in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema is associated with a significant reduction in the need for tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Class IIa recommendation, level of evidence A

There are insufficient data to demonstrate a significant reduction in mortality; however, the data do not trend in that direction.

Mechanical ventilation with endotracheal intubation in AHF

Invasive mechanical ventilation (with endotracheal intubation) should not be used to reverse hypoxaemia that could be better restored by oxygen therapy, CPAP, or NIPPV, but rather to reverse AHF-induced respiratory muscle fatigue. The latter is the most frequent reason for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Respiratory muscle fatigue may be diagnosed by a decrease in respiratory rate, associated with hypercapnia and confused state of mind.

Invasive mechanical ventilation should only be used if acute respiratory failure does not respond to vasodilators, oxygen therapy, and/or CPAP, or NIPPV. Another consideration should be the need for immediate intervention in a patient with pulmonary oedema secondary to ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Medical treatment

Morphine and its analogues in AHF

Morphine is indicated in the early stage of the treatment of a patient admitted with severe AHF, especially if associated with restlessness and dyspnoea.

Class IIb recommendation, level of evidence B

Morphine induces venodilatation and mild arterial dilatation, and reduces heart rate. In most studies, iv boluses of morphine 3 mg were administered as soon as the intravenous line was inserted. This dosing can be repeated if required.

Anticoagulation
Anticoagulation is well established in acute coronary syndrome with or without heart failure. The same is true in atrial fibrillation. There is less evidence for the initiation of unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in AHF. A large placebo-controlled trial of enoxaparine 40 mg subcutaneoulsy in acutely ill and hospitalized patients, including a major group of heart failure patients, showed no clinical improvement but less venous thrombosis. There are no large comparative studies comparing LMWH to unfractionated heparin (given as 5000 IU twice or thrice daily). Careful monitoring of the coagulation system is mandatory in AHF as there is often concomitant liver dysfunction. LMWH is contraindicated if the creatinine clearance is below 30 mL/min or should be used with extreme care with monitoring of the anti-Factor Xa level.

Vasodilators in the treatment of AHF

Vasodilators are indicated in most patients with acute heart failure as first line therapy, if hypoperfusion is associated with an adequate blood pressure and signs of congestion with low diuresis, to open the peripheral circulation and to lower pre-load (Table 8).

Table 8

Indications and dosing of vasodilators in AHF

Vasodilator

Indication

Dosing

Main side effects

Other


 

Glyceryl trinitrate, 5-mononitrate

Acute heart failure, when blood pressure is adequate

Start 20 µg/min, increase to 200 µg/min

Hypotension, headache

Tolerance on continuous use

Isosorbide dinitrate

Acute heart failure, when blood pressure is adequate

Start with 1 mg/h, increase to 10 mg/h

Hypotension, headache

Tolerance on continuous use

Nitroprusside

Hypertensive crisis, cardiogenic shock combined with intoropes

0.3–5µg/kg/min

Hypotension, isocyanate toxicity

Drug is light sensitive

Nesiritidea

Acute decompensated heart failure

Bolus 2 µg/kg + infusion 0.015–0.03 µg/kg/min

Hypotension

 

 

Nesiritide
Recently, nesiritide, a new class of vasodilator, has been developed for the treatment of AHF. Nesiritide is a recombinant human brain or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) that is identical to the endogenous hormone. Nesiritide has venous, arterial, and coronary vasodilatory properties that reduce pre-load and after-load, and increase cardiac output without direct inotropic effects.

Systemic infusion of nesiritide in patients with CHF has beneficial haemodynamic actions, results in an enhanced sodium excretion, and suppression of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone and sympathetic nervous systems.79 Nesiritide was compared to intravenous nitroglycerin and resulted in improvement in haemodynamics more effectively and with fewer adverse effects, although this did not translate into improvement in clinical outcome. Nesiritide may cause hypotension and some patients are non-responders.

 

Nitrates
Nitrates relieve pulmonary congestion without compromising stroke volume or increasing myocardial oxygen demand in acute left heart failure, particularly in patients with acute coronary syndrome. At low doses they only induce venodilation, but as the dose is gradually increased they cause the arteries, including the coronary arteries, to dilate. With appropriate doses, nitrates exert balanced vasodilation of the venous and arterial sides of the circulation, thereby reducing LV pre-load and after-load, without impairing tissue perfusion. Their effect on cardiac output depends on pre-treatment pre-load and after-load and the ability of the heart to respond to baroreceptor-induced increases in sympathetic tone.

Initially nitrates may be given orally but intravenous nitrates are also well tolerated in AMI. Two randomized trials in AHF have established the efficacy of intravenous nitrates in combination with furosemide and have demonstrated that titration to the highest haemodynamically tolerable dose of nitrates with low dose furosemide is superior to high dose diuretic treatment alone.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence B

In one of these randomized studies furosemide and isosorbide dinitrate as bolus injections were tested and it was reported that intravenous high dose nitrate was more effective than furosemide treatment in controlling severe pulmonary oedema.75

In practical use nitrates have a U-shaped curve effect. If given in sub-optimal doses vasodilators may have a limited effect in preventing AHF recurrences. However, administration of high doses may also reduce their effectiveness. One disadvantage of nitrates is the rapid development of tolerance especially when given intravenously in high doses, limiting their effectiveness to 16–24 h only. Nitrates should be given at doses aimed at achieving optimal vasodilation, leading to an increase in cardiac index (CI) and decrease in pulmonary wedge pressure. Inappropriate vasodilation may induce a steep reduction in blood pressure, which may result in haemodynamic instability.

Nitroglycerin can be administered orally or by inhalation [glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) spray 400 µg (2 puffs) every 5–10 min], or buccally (isosorbide dinitrate 1 or 3 mg), while monitoring blood pressure. The intravenous administration and dosing of nitrates (glycerylnitrate 20 µg/min increasing dose to 200 µg/min, or isosorbide dinitrate 1–10 mg/h) should be done with extreme caution, under careful blood pressure monitoring, titrating the dose administered against blood pressure decrease. One should be particularly cautious when administering nitrates to a patient with aortic stenosis, although this therapy may help in these complex situations. The dose of nitrates should be reduced if systolic blood pressure falls below 90–100 mmHg and discontinued permanently if blood pressure drops further. From a practical point of view a reduction of 10 mmHg in mean arterial pressure should be achieved.

Sodium nitroprusside

Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (0.3 µg/kg/min up-titrating carefully to 1 µg/kg/min up to 5 µg/kg/min) is recommended in patients with severe heart failure, and in patients with predominantly increased after-load such as hypertensive heart failure or mitral regurgitation.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence C

SNP should be titrated cautiously and usually requires invasive arterial monitoring and close supervision. Prolonged administration may be associated with toxicity from its metabolites, thiocyanide and cyanide, and should be avoided especially in patients with severe renal or hepatic failure. Controlled trials with SNP in AHF are lacking and its administration in AMI has yielded equivocal results. SNP should be tapered down to avoid rebound effects. In AHF caused by acute coronary syndromes, nitrates are favoured over SNP as SNP may cause ‘coronary steal syndrome’.

Calcium antagonists

Calcium antagonists are not recommended in the treatment of AHF. Diltiazem and verapamil, and dihydropyridines, should be considered contraindicated.

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors in AHF

ACE-inhibitors are not indicated in the early stabilization of patients with AHF.

Class IIb recommendation, level of evidence C

However, as these patients are at high risk, ACE-inhibitors have a role in early management of AHF patients and AMI. There is still debate on the selection of patients and the timing of initiation of ACE-inhibitor therapy.

Effects and mechanism of action

The haemodynamic effects of ACE-inhibitors result from decreased formation of AII and increased levels of bradykinin, which in turn decreases total peripheral vascular resistances and promotes natriuresis. Short-term treatment is accompanied by a decrease in angiotensin II (AII) and aldosterone and an increase in angiotensin I and plasma renin activity.

There have been no efficacy studies of ACE-inhibitors in AHF to date. Studies with ACE-inhibitors in heart failure after myocardial infarction have focused on long-term effects. A recent meta-analysis found that mortality at 30 days was reduced from 7.6% in the placebo group to 7.1% in the ACE-inhibitor group [relative risk reduction 7% (95% CI 2–11%, P<0.004)]. This equates to about five fewer deaths per 1000 patients treated for 4–6 weeks [number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one death=200]. The trials which selected high-risk patients found that ACE-inhibitors led to large relative and absolute reductions in mortality.

Intravenous ACE-inhibition should be avoided. The initial dose of the ACE-inhibitor should be low and increased progressively after early stabilization within 48 h with monitoring of blood pressure and renal function. The duration of therapy, when initiated, should be at least six weeks.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence A

ACE-inhibitors should be used with caution in patients with marginal cardiac output as they may significantly reduce glomerular filtration.The risk of intolerance to the ACE-inhibitors is increased by the concomitant administration of non-steroid anti-inflammatory agents, and in the presence of bilateral renal artery stenosis.

Diuretics
Administration of diuretics is indicated in patients with acute and acutely decompensated heart failure in the presence of symptoms secondary to fluid retention.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence B

The symptomatic benefits and their universal clinical acceptance have precluded a formal evaluation in large-scale randomized clinical trials.

Effects and mechanisms of action

Diuretics increase the urine volume by enhancing the excretion of water, sodium chloride and other ions, leading to a decrease in plasma and extracellular fluid volume, total body water and sodium, a reduction in right and left ventricular filling pressures and a decrease in peripheral congestion and pulmonary oedema. Intravenous administration of loop diuretics also exerts a vasodilating effect, manifested by an early (5–30 min) decrease in right atrial and pulmonary wedge pressure as well as pulmonary resistances. With high bolus doses (>1 mg/kg) there is a risk of reflex vasoconstriction. As opposed to chronic use of diuretics, in severe decompensated heart failure the use of diuretics normalizes loading conditions and may reduce neurohormonal activation in the short term. Especially in acute coronary syndromes diuretics should be used in low doses and preference given to vasodilator therapy.

Intravenous administration of loop diuretics (furosemide, bumetanide, torasemide), with a strong and brisk diuretic effect is the preferred choice in patients with AHF. Therapy can safely be initiated before hospital admission and the dose should be titrated according to the diuretic response and relief of congestive symptoms. Administration of a loading dose followed by continued infusion of furosemide or torasemide have been shown to be more effective than bolus alone. Thiazides and spironolactone can be used in association with loop diuretics, the combination in low doses being more effective and having with fewer secondary effects than the use of higher doses of a single drug. Combination of loop diuretics with dobutamine, dopamineor nitrates is also a therapeutic approach that is more effective and produces fewer secondary effects than increasing the dose of the diuretic.

Class IIb recommendation, level of evidence C

Table below  lists the recommendations for the practical use of diuretics. Table gives the recommended doses of commonly used diuretics in heart failure.

Table 10 

Practical use of diuretics in AHF

Start with individualized dose depending on clinical condition

Titrate according to clinical response

Reduce dose when fluid retention is controlled

Monitor serum K+, Na+ and renal function at frequent intervals (every 1–2 days), according to diuretic response

Replace K+ and Mg+ loss

Table 11 

Diuretic dosing and administration

Severity of fluid retention

Diuretic

Dose (mg)

Comments


 

Moderate

Furosemide, or

20–40

Oral or intravenous according to clinical symptoms

 

Bumetanide, or

0.5–1.0

Titrate dose according to clinical response

 

Torasemide

10–20

Monitor Na+, K+, creatinine and blood pressure

Severe

Furosemide, or Furosemide infusion

40–100

Intravenously

 

 

5–40 mg/h

Better than very high bolus doses

 

Bumetanide, or Torasemide

1–4

Orally or intravenously

 

 

20–100

Orally

Refractory to loop diuretics

Add HCTZ, or

25–50 twice daily

Combination with loop diuretic better than very high dose of loop diuretics alone

 

Metolazone, or

2.5–10 once daily

Metolazone more potent if creatinine clearance <30 mL/min

 

Spironolactone

25–50 once daily

Spironolactone best choice if patient not in renal failure and normal or low serum K+

In case of alkalosis

Acetazolamide

0.5

Intravenously

Refractory to loop diuretic and thiazides

Add dopamine for renal vasodilatation, or dobutamine as an inotropic agent

 

Consider ultrafiltration or haemodialysis if co-existing renal failure

HCTZ=hydrochlorothiazide.

Diuretic resistance

Diuretic resistance is defined as the clinical state in which diuretic response is diminished or lost before the therapeutic goal of oedema relief has been achieved. Such resistance is associated with a poor prognosis. It is more frequent in patients with chronic, severe heart failure on long-term diuretic therapy, although it has also been reported with acute volume depletion after intravenous administration of loop diuretics. Diuretic resistance can be attributed to a number of factors. A number of therapeutic approaches to overcome diuretic resistance have been explored, and in clinical practice different strategies may be of value in a particular patient. Continuous infusion of furosemide is more effective than individual boluses.

 

Table 12

Causes of diuretic resistance

Intravascular volume depletion

Neurohormonal activation

Rebound Na+ uptake after volume loss

Hypertrophy of distal nephron

Reduced tubular secretion (renal failure, NSAIDs)

Decreased renal perfusion (low output)

Impaired gut absorption of an oral diuretic

Non-compliance with drugs or diet (high sodium intake

 

 

Table  13

Managing resistance to diuretics

Restrict Na+/H2O intake and follow electrolytes

Volume repletion in cases of hypovolaemia

Increase dose and/or frequency of administration of diuretic

Use intravenous administration (more effective than oral) as bolus, or as intravenous infusion (more effective than high dose intravenous bolus)

Combine diuretic therapy

furosemide+HCTZ

furosemide+spironolactone

metolazone+furosemide (this combination is also active in renal failure)

Combine diuretic therapy with dopamine, or dobutamine


Although diuretics can be used safely in the majority of patients, secondary effects are frequent and may be life-threatening. They include neurohormonal activation, especially of the angiotensin–aldosterone system and the sympathetic nervous system, hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, and hypochloraemic alkalosis that may lead to severe arrhythmias, and nephrotoxicity and aggravation of renal failure. Excessive diuresis may reduce venous pressure, pulmonary wedge pressure and diastolic filling excessively, leading to a reduction in stroke volume and cardiac output, particularly in patients with severe heart failure and predominant diastolic failure or ischaemic RV dysfunction. Intravenous administration of acetazolamide (1 or 2 doses) may be helpful for the correction of alkalosis.

Some new compounds with diuretic and other effects are under investigation, including vasopressin V2 receptor antagonists, brain natriuretic peptides and adenosine receptor antagonists.

ß-blocking agents

  There has been no study with ß-blocker therapy in AHF targeted to acutely improve the condition. On the contrary, AHF has been considered a contraindication for this treatment. Patients with more than basal pulmonary rales, or hypotension, have been excluded from trials early after AMI. In patients with AMI who are not in overt heart failure or hypotensive, ß-blockers limit infarct size, reduce life-threatening arrhythmias and relieve pain.

Intravenous administration should be considered in patients with ischaemic chest pain resistant to opiates, recurrent ischaemia, hypertension, tachycardia, or arrhythmia. In the Gothenburg metoprolol study, intravenous metoprolol or placebo was initiated early after an AMI and followed by oral therapy for three months. Fewer patients developed heart failure in the metoprolol group. In patients with signs of pulmonary congestion with basal rales and/or treatment with intravenous furosemide, metoprolol therapy had even greater effects and reduced mortality and morbidity. There is experience with the short acting ß-blocker esmolol mainly in the setting of cardiac surgery. One small study has compared celiprolol and esmolol in severe heart failure. Celiprolol reduced CI less at similar heart rate reduction, which was claimed to be due to differences in the vasodilation effect. The clinical importance of this difference is unclear. Invasive haemodynamic monitoring was carried out in the MIAMI trial on patients with elevated pulmonary wedge pressures up to 30 mmHg. These patients when treated with metoprolol showed a decrease in filling pressures.

In patients with overt AHF and more than basal pulmonary rales, ß-blockers should be used cautiously. Among such patients in whom ongoing ischaemia and tachycardia are present, intravenous metoprolol can be considered.

Class IIb recommendation, level of evidence C

However, in patients with an AMI who stabilize after developing AHF, ß-blockers should be initiated early.

Class IIa recommendation, level of evidence B

In patients with chronic heart failure, ß-blockers should be initiated when the patient has stabilized after the acute episode (usually after 4 days).

Class I recommendation, level of evidence A

The initial oral dose of bisoprolol, carvedilol, or metoprolol should be small and increased slowly and progressively to the target dose used in the large clinical trials. Up-titration should be adapted to individual response. ß-blockers may reduce blood pressure and heart rate excessively. As a general rule, patients on ß-blockers admitted to hospital due to worsening heart failure should be continued on this therapy unless inotropic support is needed but the dose could be reduced if signs of excessive dosage are suspected (i.e. bradycardia and hypotension).

Inotropic agents

 Inotropic agents are indicated in the presence of peripheral hypoperfusion (hypotension, decreased renal function) with or without congestion or pulmonary oedema refractory to diuretics and vasodilators at optimal doses (Figure)

Fig. 11. Rationale for inotropic drugs in AHF


Class IIa recommendation, level of evidence C

Their use is potentially harmful as they increase oxygen demand and calcium loading and they should be used with caution.

In patients with decompensated CHF the symptoms, clinical course, and prognosis of the disease may become critically dependent on the haemodynamics. Thus, improvements in the haemodynamic parameters may become a goal of treatment and inotropic agents may be useful and life-saving in this setting. The beneficial effects of an improvement in the haemodynamic parameters is, however, partially counteracted by the risks of arrhythmias and, in some cases, myocardial ischaemia and by the possible long-term progression of myocardial dysfunction caused by an excessive increase in energy expenditure. The risk-benefit ratio may not, however, be the same for all the inotropic agents. Those acting through the stimulation of the ß1-adrenergic receptors which increase cytoplasmic myocardial cell Ca++ concentration may be associated with the greatest risk. Lastly, only a few controlled trials with inotropic agents in patients with AHF have been performed, and very few have assessed their effects on the symptoms and signs of heart failure and their long-term effects on prognosis.

Dopamine
At low doses (<2 µg/kg/min i.v.) dopamine acts only on peripheral dopaminergic receptors and lowers peripheral resistance both directly and indirectly. Vasodilation occurs predominantly in the renal, splanchnic, coronary, and cerebral vascular beds. At this dosage, its action may cause an improvement in renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate, diuresis, and sodium excretion rate, with an increased response to diuretic agents, in patients with renal hypoperfusion and failure.

At higher doses (>2 µg/kg/min i.v.) dopamine stimulates the ß-adrenergic receptors both directly and indirectly with a consequent increase in myocardial contractility and cardiac output. At doses >5 µg/kg/min dopamine acts on {alpha}-adrenergic receptors with an increase in the peripheral vascular resistance which, though potentially useful in hypotensive patients, may be deleterious in patients with AHF, as it may augment the LV after-load, pulmonary artery pressure, and pulmonary resistance.

Dobutamine
Dobutamine is a positive inotropic agent acting mainly through stimulation of ß1-receptors and ß2-receptors to produce dose-dependent positive inotropic and chronotropic effects, and a reflex decrease in sympathetic tone, and thus vascular resistance. The resultant benefit may therefore differ from patient to patient. At low doses, dobutamine induces mild arterial vasodilatation, which augments stroke volume by reductions in after-load. At higher doses dobutamine causes vasoconstriction.

Heart rate is generally increased in a dose-dependent manner to a lesser extent than with other cathecholamines. However, in patients with atrial fibrillation, heart rate may be increased to undesirable rates, due to facilitation of atrioventricular (AV) conduction. Systemic arterial pressure usually increases slightly, but may remain stable, or decrease. Similarly pulmonary arterial pressure and capillary wedge pressure usually decrease, but may remain stable or even increase in some patients with heart failure.

The improved diuresis observed during dobutamine infusion in patients with heart failure is the result of increased renal blood flow in response to improved cardiac output.

Dopamine may be used as an inotrope (>2 µg/kg/min i.v.) in AHF with hypotension. Infusion of low doses of dopamine (≤2–3 µg/kg/min) may be used to improve renal blood flow and diuresis in decompensated heart failure with hypotension and low urine output. However if no response is seen the therapy should be terminated.

Table 14

 Administration of positive inotropic agents

 

Bolus

Infusion rate


 

Dobutamine

No

2 to 20 µg/kg/min (ß+)

Dopamine

No

<3 µg/kg/min: renal effect ({delta}+) 3–5 µg/kg/min: inotropic (ß+) >5 µg/kg/min: (ß+), vasopressor ({alpha}+)

Milrinone

25–75 µg/kg over 10–20 min

0.375–0.75 µg/kg/min

Enoximone

0.25–0.75 mg/kg

1.25–7.5 µg/kg/min

Levosimendan

12–24 µg/kga over 10 min

0.1 µg/kg/min which can be decreased to 0.05 or increased to 0.2 µg/kg/min

Norepinephrine

No bolus

0.2–1.0 µg/kg/min

Epinephrine

Bolus: 1 mg can be given i.v. at resuscitation, may be repeated after 3–5 min, endotracheal route is not favoured

0.05–0.5 µg/kg/min

 

Class of recommendation IIb, level of evidence C

Dobutamine is currently indicated when there is evidence of peripheral hypoperfusion (hypotension, decreased renal function) with or without congestion or pulmonary oedema refractory to diuretics and vasodilators at optimal doses.

Class IIa recommendation, level of evidence C

Dobutamine is used to increase the cardiac output. It is usually initiated with a 2–3 µg/kg/min infusion rate without a loading dose. The infusion rate may then be progressively modified according to symptoms, diuretic response, or haemodynamic monitoring. Its haemodynamic actions are proportional to its dosage, which can be increased to 20 µg/kg/min. The elimination of the drug is rapid after cessation of infusion, making it a very convenient inotropic agent.

In patients receiving ß-blocker therapy with metoprolol, dobutamine doses have to be increased as high as 15–20 µg/kg/min to restore its inotropic effect. The effect of dobutamine differs in patients receiving carvedilol: it can lead to an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance during the infusion of increasing doses of dobutamine (5--20 µg/kg/min).

Based on haemodynamic data alone, the inotropic effect of dobutamine is additive to that of phosphodieasterase inhibitors (PDEI); the combination of PDEI and dobutamine produces a positive inotropic effect greater than either drug alone.

Prolonged infusion of dobutamine (above 24–48 h) is associated with tolerance and partial loss of haemodynamic effects. Weaning from dobutamine may be difficult because of recurrence of hypotension, congestion, or renal insufficiency. This can sometimes be solved by very progressive tapering of dobutamine (i.e. decrease in dosage by steps of 2 µg/kg/min every other day) and optimization of oral vasodilator therapy such as with hydralazine and/or an ACE-inhibitor. It is sometimes necessary to tolerate some renal insufficiency or hypotension during this phase.

Infusion of dobutamine is accompanied by an increased incidence of arrhythmia originating from both ventricles and atria. This effect is dose-related and may be more prominent than with PDEI and should prompt strict potassium compensation during intravenous diuretic use. Tachycardia may also be a limiting parameter, and dobutamine infusion may trigger chest pain in patients with coronary artery disease. In patients with hibernating myocardium dobutamine appears to increase contractility in the short term at the expense of myocyte necrosis and loss in myocardial recovery. There are no controlled trials on dobutamine in AHF patients and some trials show unfavourable effects with increased untoward cardiovascular events.

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors

Milrinone and enoximone are the two Type III phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDEIs) used in clinical practice. In AHF, these agents have significant inotropic, lusitropic, and peripheral vasodilating effects with an increase in cardiac output and stroke volume, and a concomitant decline in pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary wedge pressure, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance. Their haemodynamic profile is intermediate between that of a pure vasodilator, like nitroprusside, and that of a predominant inotropic agent, like dobutamine. As their site of action is distal to the beta-adrenergic receptors, PDEIs maintain their effects even during concomitant ß-blocker therapy.

Type III PDEIs are indicated when there is evidence of peripheral hypoperfusion with or without congestion refractory to diuretics and vasodilators at optimal doses, and preserved systemic blood pressure.

Class of recommendation IIb, level of evidence C

These agents may be preferred to dobutamine in patients on concomitant ß-blocker therapy, and/or with an inadequate response to dobutamine.

Class of recommendation IIa, level of evidence C

In practical use milrinone is administered as a 25 µg/kg bolus over 10–20 min, followed by a continuous infusion at 0.375–0.75 µg/kg/min. Similarly, enoximone is administered as a bolus of 0.25–0.75 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion at 1.25–7.5 µg/kg/min. Hypotension caused by excessive peripheral venodilation is an untoward effect observed mainly in patients with low filling pressures. It may be avoided by starting the infusion without any bolus. Thrombocytopaenia is uncommon with both milrinone (0.4%) and enoximone.

The data regarding the effects of PDEI administration on the outcome of patients with AHF are insufficient, but raise concerns about safety, particularly in patients with ischaemic heart failure.

Levosimendan
Levosimendan has two main mechanisms of action: Ca++ sensitization of the contractile proteins responsible for a positive inotropic action, and smooth muscle K+ channel opening responsible for peripheral vasodilation. Some data suggest levosimendan may also have a phosphodioesterase inhibition effect. Levosimendan has a potent acetylated metabolite that is also a Ca++-concentration dependent Ca++ sensitizer. Its half-life is ~80 h, which probably explains the prolonged haemodynamic effects of a 24 h levosimendan infusion.

Levosimendan is indicated in patients with symptomatic low cardiac output heart failure secondary to cardiac systolic dysfunction without severe hypotension (Table ).

Class of recommendation IIa, level of evidence B

Levosimendan is generally administered as a continuous intravenous infusion at a dose of 0.05–0.1 µg/kg/min preceded by a loading dose of 12–24 µg/kg, administered over 10 min. Its haemodynamic effects are dose-dependent and the infusion rate may be up-titrated to a maximal rate of 0.2 µg/kg/min. Most of the clinical data have been obtained with intravenous infusions lasting from 6 hto 24 h, but the haemodynamic effects persist for >48 h after the end of the infusion.

Levosimendan infusion in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure caused by left ventricular systolic dysfunction has been associated with a dose-dependent increase in the cardiac output and stroke volume, a decline in the pulmonary wedge pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and pulmonary vascular resistance, and a slight increase in the heart rate, and decrease in the blood pressure. An improvement in symptoms of dyspnoea and fatigue and a favourable outcome has been shown in randomized trials comparing levosimendan with dobutamine. Differently from dobutamine, the haemodynamic response to levosimendan is maintained, or even of greater magnitude, in the patients on concomitant ß-blocker therapy.

Tachycardia and hypotension are described with high-dose levosimendan infusion and it is not currently recommended in patients with a systolic blood pressure <85 mmHg. Levosimendan has not been associated with an increased frequency of malignant arrhythmias in comparative trials with either placebo, or dobutamine. Reductions in the haematocrit, haemoglobin, and plasma potassium, likely secondary to vasodilation and secondary neurohumoral activation, have been described and seem to be dose-dependent.

Vasopressor therapy in cardiogenic shock

When the combination of inotropic agent and fluid challenge fails to restore adequate arterial and organ perfusion despite an improvement in cardiac output, therapy with vasopressors may be required. Vasopressors may also be used, in emergencies, to sustain life and maintain perfusion in the face of life-threatening hypotension. Since cardiogenic shock is associated with high vascular resistances, any vasopressor should be used with caution and only transiently, because it may increase the after-load of a failing heart and further decrease end-organ blood flow.

Epinephrine
Epinephrine is a catecholamine with high affinity for ß1, ß2, and {alpha}receptors. Epinephrine is used generally as an infusion at doses of 0.05 to 0.5 µg/kg/min when dobutamine refractoriness is present and the blood pressure remains low. Direct arterial pressure monitoring and monitoring of haemodynamic response by PAC is recommended.

Norepinephrine
Norepinehrine is a catecholamine with high affinity for {alpha}-receptors and is generally used to increase systemic vascular resistance. Norepinephrine-induced increases in heart rate are less than with epinephrine. The dosing is similar to epinephrine. Norepinephrine (0.2 to 1 µg/kg/min) is favoured in situations with low blood pressure related to reduced systemic vascular resistance such as septic shock. Norepinephrine is often combined with dobutamine to improve haemodynamics. Norepinehrine may reduce end-organ perfusion.

Cardiac glycosides


Cardiac glycosides inhibit myocardial Na+/K+ ATPase, thereby increasing Ca++/Na+ exchange mechanisms, producing a positive inotropic effect. In heart failure the positive inotropic effect following ß-adrenergic stimulation is attenuated and the positive force–frequency relationship is impaired. In contrast to ß-adrenoceptor agonists, the positive inotropic effect of cardiac glycosides is unchanged in failing hearts and the force–frequency relationship is partially restored. In chronic heart failure, cardiac glycosides reduce symptoms and improve clinical status, thereby decreasing the risk of hospitalization for heart failure without effects on survival. In AHF, cardiac glycosides produce a small increase in cardiac outputand a reduction of filling pressures. In patients with severe heart failure following episodes of acute decompensation, cardiac glycosides have been shown to be efficacious in reducing the re-occurrence of acute decompensation. Predictors for these beneficial effects are a third heart sound, extensive LV dilatation and distended jugular veins during the AHF episode.

However, in patients following myocardial infarction with heart failure, a substudy of the AIRE-Investigation has shown adverse effects on outcome after AMI accompanied by heart failure. Furthermore, following AMI an increase of creatinine kinase was more pronounced in patients receiving cardiac glycosides. In addition, for patients with myocardial infarction and AHF, the use of digitalis was a predictor for life-threatening pro-arrhythmic events. Therefore, inotropic support with cardiac glycosides cannot be recommended in AHF, in particular following myocardial infarction.

An indication for cardiac glycosides in AHF may be tachycardia-induced heart failure e.g. in atrial fibrillation with insufficient rate-control by other agents such as ß-blockers. Rigorous control of heart rate in tachyarrhythmia during the course of AHF can control heart failure symptoms. Contraindications to the use of cardiac glycosides include bradycardia, second and third degree AV-block, sick sinus syndrome, carotid sinus syndrome, Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, hypokalaemia, and hypercalcaemia.

Table  15

Treatment of arrhythmias in acute heart failure

Ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia

Defibrillate with 200–300–360J (preferably by biphasic defibrillation with a maximum of 200 J). If refractory to initial shocks inject epinephrine 1 mg or vasopressin 40 IU and/or amiodarone 150–300 mg as injection

Ventricular tachycardia

If patient is unstable cardiovert, if stable amiodarone or lidocaine can be given to achieve medical cardioversion.

Sinus tachycardia or supraventricular tachycardia

Use ß-blocking agents when clinically and haemodynamically tolerated: Metoprolol 5 mg intravenously as a slow bolus (can be repeated if tolerated) Adenosine may be used to slow AV conduction or to cardiovert re-entrant tachycardia On rare occasions: Esmolol 0.5–1.0 mg/kg over 1 min, followed by infusion of 50–300 µg/kg/min, or Labetalol 1–2 mg bolus, followed by infusion of 1–2 mg/min (to total of 50–200 mg). Labetalol also indicated in AHF related to hypertensive crisis or phaeochoromcytoma, with 10-mg boluses, to a total dose of 300 mg.

Atrial fibrillation or flutter

Cardiovert if possible. Digoxin 0.125–0.25 mg iv, or ß-blocking agent, or amiodarone, may be used to slow AV conduction. Amiodarone may induce medical cardioversion without compromising left ventricular haemodynamics. Patient should be heparinized.

Bradycardia

Atropine 0.25–0.5 mg iv, to total of 1–2 mg. As interim measure, isoproterenol 1 mg in 100 mL NaCl infused to a maximum of 75 mL/h (2–12 µg/min). If bradycardia is atropine-resistant, transcutaneous or transvenous pacing should be used as an interim measure. Theophylline may be used in AMI patients with atropine-resistant bradycardia with bolus of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg followed by infusion at 0.2–0.4 mg/kg/h

 

Class IIa recommendation, level of evidence C

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT)

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias may complicate or cause AHF. On rare occasions persistent atrial tachycardias may cause decompensated heart failure requiring hospitalization. Similarly, atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response may be the cause for a dilated cardiomyopathy and AHF.

Recommendations for treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in AHF

The control of the ventricular rate response is important in patients with AF and AHF, particularly in patients with diastolic dysfunction.

Class IIa recommendation, level of evidence A

Patients with restrictive physiology or tamponade, however, may suddenly deteriorate with rapid heart rate reduction. Rapid rate control or cardioversion on clinical demand should be achieved . The therapy of AF depends on its duration.

Patients with AHF and AF should be anticoagulated. When AF is paroxysmal, medical or electrical cardioversion should be considered after initial work-up and stabilization of the patient. If the duration of the AF is more than 48 h the patient should be anticoagulated and optimal rate control achieved medically for 3 weeks before cardioversion. If the patient is haemodynamically unstable, urgent cardioversion is clinically mandatory, but atrial thrombus should be excluded by transoesophageal echocardiography prior to cardioversion.

Verapamil and diltiazem should be avoided in acute AF as they may worsen heart failure and cause third degree AV block. Amiodarone and ß-blocking agents have been successfully used in AF for rate control and prevention of recurrence.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence A

Verapamil can be considered in the treatment of AF or narrow complex SVT in patients with only slightly reduced ventricular systolic function.

Class I anti-arrhythmic agents should be avoided in patients with low ejection fraction and particularly in patients who have a wide QRS complex. Dofetilide is a new drug with promising results in medical cardioversion and prevention of new AF, but further studies are needed to evaluate its safety and efficacy in AHF.

ß-blocking agents can be tried in SVTs when tolerated. In wide complex tachycardia, intravenous adenosine can be used in an attempt to terminate the arrhythmia. Electrical cardioversion of SVT with sedation should be considered in AHF with hypotension. AHF patients with AMI and heart failure, and patients with diastolic heart failure, do not tolerate rapid supraventricular arrhythmias.

Plasma potassium and magnesium levels should be normalized particularly in patients with ventricular arrhythmia.

Class IIb recommendation, level of evidence B

Treatment of life-threatening arrhythmias

Ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachyarrythmia require immediate cardioversion, with ventilator assistance if required, and in the case of a conscious patient, with sedation.

Amiodarone and ß-blocking agents can prevent repetition of these arrhythmias.

Class I recommendation, level of evidence A

In the case of recurrent ventricular arrhythmias and haemodynamically unstable patients, immediate angiography and electrophysiological testing should be performed. In cases of a localized arrhythmic substrate, radiofrequency ablation may eliminate the arrhythmic tendency although the long-term effect cannot be ascertained.

Surgical treatment of AHF

AHF is a severe complication of many cardiac disorders. In some of them surgical therapy improves prognosis if performed urgently or immediately. Surgical options include coronary revascularization, correction of the anatomic lesions, valve replacement or reconstruction, as well as temporary circulatory support by means of mechanical assist devices. Echocardiography is the most important technique in the diagnostic work-up.

Table 16 

 Cardiac disorders and AHF requiring surgical treatment

Cardiogenic shock after AMI in patients with multi-vessel ischaemic heart disease

Post-infarction ventricular septal defect

Free wall rupture

Acute decompensation of pre-existing heart valve disease

Prosthetic valve failure or thrombosis

Aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection rupture into the pericardial sac

Acute mitral regurgitation from:

  • Ischaemic papillary muscle rupture
  • Ischaemic papillary muscle dysfunction
  • Myxomatous chordal rupture
  • Endocarditis
  • Trauma

 

Summary comments
The clinical syndrome of AHF may present as de novo AHF or as decompensated CHF with forward, left (backward), or right (backward) dominance in the clinical syndrome.

A patient with AHF requires immediate diagnostic evaluation and care, and frequent resuscitative measures to improve symptoms and survival.

Initial diagnostic assessment should include clinical examination supported by the patient's history, ECG, chest X-ray, plasma BNP/NT-proBNP, and other laboratory tests. Echocardiography should be performed in all patients as soon as possible (unless recently done and the result is available).

The initial clinical assessment should include evaluation of pre-load, after-load, and the presence of mitral regurgitation (MR) and other complicating disorders (including valvular complications, arrhythmia, and concomitant co-morbidities such as infection, diabetes mellitus, respiratory, or renal diseases). Acute coronary syndromes are a frequent cause of AHF and coronary angiography is often required.

Following initial assessment, an intravenous line should be inserted, and physical signs, ECG and SPO2 should be monitored. An arterial line should be inserted when needed.

The initial treatment of AHF consists of:

·                     Oxygenation with face-mask or by CPAP (SPO2 target of 94–96%)

·                     Vasodilatation by nitrate or nitroprusside

·                     Diuretic therapy by furosemide or other loop diuretic (initially intravenous bolus followed by continuous intravenous infusion, when needed)

·                     Morphine for relief of physical and psychological distress and to improve haemodynamics

·                     Intravenous fluids should be given if the clinical condition is pre-load-dependent and there are signs of low filling pressure. This may require testing the response to an aliquot of fluid.

·                     Other complicating metabolic and organ-specific conditions should be treated on their own merits.

·                     Patients with acute coronary syndrome or other complicated cardiac disorders should undergo cardiac catheterization and angiography, with a view to invasive intervention including surgery.

·                     Appropriate medical treatment by ß-blocking agents and other medical therapy should be initiated as described in this report.

Further specific therapies should be administered based on the clinical and haemodynamic characteristics of the patient who does not respond to initial treatment. This may include the use of inotropic agents or a calcium sensitizer for severe decompensated heart failure, or inotropic agents for cardiogenic shock.

The aim of therapy of AHF is to correct hypoxia and increase cardiac output, renal perfusion, sodium excretion, and urine output. Other therapies may be required e.g. intravenous aminophylline or ß2-agonist for bronchodilation. Ultrafiltration or dialysis may be prescribed for refractory heart failure.

Patients with refractory AHF or end-stage heart failure should be considered for further support, where indicated including: intra-aortic balloon pump, artificial mechanical ventilation, or circulatory assist devices as a temporary measure, or as a ‘bridge’ to heart transplantation.

The patient with AHF may recover extremely well, depending on the aetiology and the underlying pathophysiology. Prolonged treatment on the ward and expert care are required. This is best delivered by a specialist heart failure team that can rapidly initiate medical management and attend to the information needs of the patient and family.